ADVERTISEMENT

Purdue considering building nuclear reactor

Marvin the Martian

Hall of Famer
Gold Member
Sep 4, 2001
38,925
26,646
113
It would be smaller than most existing reactors, but Purdue and Duke Energy are considering building a nuclear reactor to power Purdue.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
It would be smaller than most existing reactors, but Purdue and Duke Energy are considering building a nuclear reactor to power Purdue.

Those bastards. And so it begins. IU must also build a reactor, but a bigger reactor. One that let's them know that we too are a nuclear power and not to be trifled with.
 
Those bastards. And so it begins. IU must also build a reactor, but a bigger reactor. One that let's them know that we too are a nuclear power and not to be trifled with.
You probably know this but the race to have the biggest memorial union building was similar. I believe each school would add-on every few years just to be the largest.

However, I applaud Purdue for this as I believe nuclear to be a very good energy independence alternative for the future.
 
It would be smaller than most existing reactors, but Purdue and Duke Energy are considering building a nuclear reactor to power Purdue.

Good.
 
It would be smaller than most existing reactors, but Purdue and Duke Energy are considering building a nuclear reactor to power Purdue.

It would be smaller than most existing reactors, but Purdue and Duke Energy are considering building a nuclear reactor to power Purdue.


I've read about these small reactors. They are buried and have a limited life span of, say, 30 years or so. They are designed to power smaller towns or neighborhoods.

They are supposedly very safe.

Don't ask me the details or even if they're in use anywhere. It's something I read maybe 15 or 20 years ago but it sounded really promising.
 
This will technically not be the first nuclear reactor built at Purdue. They had a 1/20th scale non-functional unit back in the '90s that was a joint partnership with GE. The purpose of that model was to help test a new reactor design that would use natural flow of water (non-pumped) to help cool the reactor in the case of a disaster / loss of power. I think the design was proven to work, but since we haven't been really building any new nuclear power plants in the last 30 years, I don't think that the design was ever implemented on a real-world scale. Could be wrong though, didn't follow it closely enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: larsIU
Beats that damn wind farm that stretches from West Lafayette to Chicago.
Yeah..., a bunch of C- engineering students mentored by guys who are the D team at their respective companies (or they'd be working on serious projects) , what could possibly go wrong...?

My question is one of Need..., do they need it to further their teaching or can they just drive over to Clinton, Illinois and see the real thing or perhaps contract with our department of informatics 😉 and have them design several direct live feeds to working Nuke plants of various types all around the country...

Internships are where real life, "cutting edge" training should take place, where you're learning from the A team, especially when you're dealing with such serious consequences of potential human error...

I have Zero confidence or trust in p u's ability to run this safely over the long term... They can't even grow their own much ballyhooed version of bluegrass on their own football field for gosh sakes!!!!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Those bastards. And so it begins. IU must also build a reactor, but a bigger reactor. One that let's them know that we too are a nuclear power and not to be trifled with.
As long as the People’s Republic of Bloomington is part of Indiana we’re good. What I want to know is, when we move on Kentucky?
 
As long as the People’s Republic of Bloomington is part of Indiana we’re good. What I want to know is, when we move on Kentucky?
Who wants it? Other than race horses, what's it's value? Sorry MTOIOTF....
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
This will technically not be the first nuclear reactor built at Purdue. They had a 1/20th scale non-functional unit back in the '90s that was a joint partnership with GE. The purpose of that model was to help test a new reactor design that would use natural flow of water (non-pumped) to help cool the reactor in the case of a disaster / loss of power. I think the design was proven to work, but since we haven't been really building any new nuclear power plants in the last 30 years, I don't think that the design was ever implemented on a real-world scale. Could be wrong though, didn't follow it closely enough.
Close. Purdue has had an operating nuclear reactor since 1962. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purdue_University_Reactor_Number_One
 
  • Like
Reactions: larsIU and Bill4411
The Purdue reactor was among the first to be designed mainly for student use.[3] It is licensed to produce up to one kilowatt of thermal power, comparable to the energy demand of a hair dryer or a toaster."

LMAO!
And they've already been cited for safety violations and noted to have extraordinarily poor security the first time around...

Doesn't the state of Indiana government have any final say in this project??? I want my rep voting a resounding No on this one...
-Indianapolis is downwind about two thirds (or more) of the year...-
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
And they've already been cited for safety violations and noted to have extraordinarily poor security the first time around...

Doesn't the state of Indiana government have any final say in this project??? I want my rep voting a resounding No on this one...
-Indianapolis is downwind about two thirds (or more) of the year...-
I make fun of it, but I don't see anything wrong with it, as long as it's overseen by the proper authorities.

I think any research into nuclear energy is a good thing and something we'll need at some point as a civilization. I probably won't be around to see it, but my grandchildren might.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_6hv78pr714xta
I make fun of it, but I don't see anything wrong with it, as long as it's overseen by the proper authorities.

I think any research into nuclear energy is a good thing and something we'll need at some point as a civilization. I probably won't be around to see it, but my grandchildren might.

I'm for nuclear energy just not when it's developed and run by 5th teamers who've already shown they can't be trusted over the long haul and a nuclear reactor is as "long haul" a project as it gets...
 
I'm for nuclear energy just not when it's developed and run by 5th teamers who've already shown they can't be trusted over the long haul and a nuclear reactor is as "long haul" a project as it gets...
I don't think they're going to be breaking much new ground.

It's probably more just an attempt to create a working model of a smaller nuke.

I'd rather it be in West Laffy than Bloomington.

Hopefully it will be under or around Mackey or Ross-Ade.
 
It would be smaller than most existing reactors, but Purdue and Duke Energy are considering building a nuclear reactor to power Purdue.

It’s hard to have a real nuclear engineering program without a lab.
It’s a built-in font of research data and tenure track building technical papers.
The waste heat (steam) would be enough to keep the campus warm in the winter.
And, it’s fossil fuel free.

Then again, Purdue already has a lab reactor for its Nuclear Engineering program.
https://engineering.purdue.edu/NE/research/facilities/reactor/index_html

There are plenty of wind farms on I65 to show that the campus can’t rely on a wind farm alone.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT