ADVERTISEMENT

Portal Options

I actually liked the energy sparks brought. If DeVries thought he could make a useful player out of him, it would be interesting to see if he couldn't get some minutes out of him.
Does he have any eligibility left? 2 at BSU, 1 at IU, and then back to BSU for a year? Was never injured so should not have a RS year. IF he would be willing to come back and has eligibility, he would be the type I would like for the 3rd big to add. That said, no idea how he could get a 5th year
 
  • Like
Reactions: 76-1 and kkott
Does he have any eligibility left? 2 at BSU, 1 at IU, and then back to BSU for a year? Was never injured so should not have a RS year. IF he would be willing to come back and has eligibility, he would be the type I would like for the 3rd big to add. That said, no idea how he could get a 5th year
I thought he was coming off his freshman year at BSU when he came to IU? Doubtful, I'm just saying I thought he had more to offer than what we got out of him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 76-1
Nope left after 2 years the first time

I'm not hung up on him, but think he's the type of player that we could get useful minutes out of without breaking the bank. I didn't think it would have been likely anyway, but I felt like he took a lot of heat on here at times, but I liked that he came in and played hard and with emotion even if he was maybe overmatched or misused.
 
I'm not hung up on him, but think he's the type of player that we could get useful minutes out of without breaking the bank. I didn't think it would have been likely anyway, but I felt like he took a lot of heat on here at times, but I liked that he came in and played hard and with emotion even if he was maybe overmatched or misused.
I agree, I think he would be the ideal 4th big who plays vs certain matchups and plays really hard and physical and would be better if coached right, and put into the proper situations with few expectations. If he is our 4th with Bailey, Fredricko, and Curtis (or similiar types) I would be good with it!
 
I agree, I think he would be the ideal 4th big who plays vs certain matchups and plays really hard and physical and would be better if coached right, and put into the proper situations with few expectations. If he is our 4th with Bailey, Fredricko, and Curtis (or similiar types) I would be good with it!
Payton Sparks does not have eligibility left. Like many others, he is entering the portal on the off-chance that a lawsuit against the NCAA limiting eligibility is successful and results in another year. His career is likely over but IF the lawsuit goes against the NCAA, these guys want to have entered the portal so they would have options. Nearly every school is proceeding as if those players will not be eligible and are not pursuing them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 76-1
A quote I saw on X from Jason Drake:

“They’re not getting all the high level guys, they’re getting guys that are trying to win and are about the right thing and everybody is pretty selfless. I feel like that’s the way you build a winning team and winning culture.”
 
A quote I saw on X from Jason Drake:

“They’re not getting all the high level guys, they’re getting guys that are trying to win and are about the right thing and everybody is pretty selfless. I feel like that’s the way you build a winning team and winning culture.”
Well, I hope the part about "not getting high level guys" is just poor wording!!! I agree not getting the big NAME guys, but I really hope the one we have can play at a high level!

That said, I am sure it was not meant as a slight to who we have and meant more to say not getting the biggest name guys and going with guys with a chip on their shoulder who want to win
 
  • Like
Reactions: IndyMitchell
I actually liked the energy sparks brought. If DeVries thought he could make a useful player out of him, it would be interesting to see if he couldn't get some minutes out of him.
He doesn't fit. Slow footed low post player, and from what I've seen from DD teams that's not something he uses much, if at all. Ideally his bigs need to run the floor and be able to shoot. Players like Sparks, can't do that. Coach is firmly in 2025 on team building and offensive philosophy, not stuck in the 90s power post era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hoosier0808
Payton Sparks does not have eligibility left. Like many others, he is entering the portal on the off-chance that a lawsuit against the NCAA limiting eligibility is successful and results in another year. His career is likely over but IF the lawsuit goes against the NCAA, these guys want to have entered the portal so they would have options. Nearly every school is proceeding as if those players will not be eligible and are not pursuing them.
Hope we have a real chance at Curtis and Fredricko as bigs. Maybe a back up PF yet.Sill have 5 left I think.
 
He doesn't fit. Slow footed low post player, and from what I've seen from DD teams that's not something he uses much, if at all. Ideally his bigs need to run the floor and be able to shoot. Players like Sparks, can't do that. Coach is firmly in 2025 on team building and offensive philosophy, not stuck in the 90s power post era.
I'd love to have the guy you describe, but there are precious few at this point. Dollars to doughnuts we sign a couple guys who have more limited offensive abilities but are rugged and can defend and rebound. Won't surprise me at all if we end up with a guy or two who physically are very similar to Payton Sparks. 6'8"/9"+, 240+ who are physical and bangers. That's what makes the kid who decommitted from ASU so interesting, he has 5 size but appears to be able to fit in with the offensive philosophy you mention. But, given the late hour he's assembling this years roster and that it seems light on frontcourt guys anyway, I think he's going to to sacrifice on offensive/perimeter skills and get some guys who can defend and rebound.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T.M.P.
I'm excited to watch our Mid-Major Allstar Team next season. Chip on their shoulders, selfless passing, great shooting. As DeVries has said in interviews, with the right mindset, an average defender can become a good defender. Looking at the assist rates and shooting percentages of this team, it's highly likely they will play hard for each other on both sides of the court.

IU Basketball: Cancer-free since March 18th, 2025
 
I'd love to have the guy you describe, but there are precious few at this point. Dollars to doughnuts we sign a couple guys who have more limited offensive abilities but are rugged and can defend and rebound. Won't surprise me at all if we end up with a guy or two who physically are very similar to Payton Sparks. 6'8"/9"+, 240+ who are physical and bangers. That's what makes the kid who decommitted from ASU so interesting, he has 5 size but appears to be able to fit in with the offensive philosophy you mention. But, given the late hour he's assembling this years roster and that it seems light on frontcourt guys anyway, I think he's going to to sacrifice on offensive/perimeter skills and get some guys who can defend and rebound.
Packline defense and those players really don't fit well either, they can't recover off a hard hedge with them, so they can't hard hedge effectively, they have to play drop coverage.. Which opens Hope Solo like gaps in the middle of the defense, which is not good for a packline defense. He hasn't always hedged ballhandlers, probably due to personnel but it would be nice to have the option.

We'll see what he brings in the next few weeks. Fairly mobile long defender/rebounder is my guess and slow footed power dinosaurs not ..
 
Last edited:
Payton Sparks does not have eligibility left. Like many others, he is entering the portal on the off-chance that a lawsuit against the NCAA limiting eligibility is successful and results in another year. His career is likely over but IF the lawsuit goes against the NCAA, these guys want to have entered the portal so they would have options. Nearly every school is proceeding as if those players will not be eligible and are not pursuing them.
On what basis is there a claim for more eligibility? Simply that they've already allowed other players to have extra years? They probably should have seen that would come back to bite them.
 


Jason Drake is a new entry and he's visiting IU today. Drake is transferring from Drexel, played 26.1 minutes per game, shot 39.6% from three on three attempts per game (101 total this season). He had 3.1 assists per game and is 6'2". He played the 2022-2023 season at Cleveland State, played the 2023-2024 season at Butler Community College and then played this past season at Drexel.

He was at -1.7 BPM this season at Drexel per Bart Torvik's model.


I don't know BPM from BLT but I wonder about the (minus) 1.7# you reference. What I read was that 0 to minus 2.0 generally signals bench player, over (minus) 2 signals long bench player....and that a negative BLM means that a minute of his time when he played at Drexel is less valuable than an average minute from all the other combined minutes.

Seems strange in this situation given that his 3 point and FT %s were very good, and his rebounding, assist, and TO #s weren't bad.

His % on 2 pointers was only 44%, and he didn't get to the with frequency, so there is that. But his eFG% was 49.3, which isn't bad.

Thing is, for a mediocre team, Drexel had a # of pretty good players.............

Anyway, although this guy is a 'no-name' nationally, I kind of like his addition. He's a thick (190 lbs) true combo guard who appears to have some upside and no glaring weaknesses, I'm sure he didn't use up a lot of NIL $, and he's got the right attitude.
 
Not sure we need 4 more. DeVries hasn't shown that he'll play 2 bigs much...Tucker is likely to get 30+ minutes a game, and I'd guess a lot of those will be at the "4" position. I know we're splitting hairs, but I'd say 2 more, definitely, maybe 3. As long as they each provide different abilities and strengths, namely defensive versatility, and rebounding. With how DeVries has chosen to play in the past, 5 bigs seems a little bit like wasted roster spots...that will result in kids portaling out next year. I know he can't realistically play all 13 scholarship guys enough to make them all happy... but seems like getting more guys in what his usual 1-4 spots would be, increases the likelihood we'll need them.


We've got 8......you really need 12 to run effective practices, don't you? If we're operating on a $10M budget, we should have about $2.5---$2.7 left......get the two best bigs you can find that fit your scheme, and then take a real flier on 2 of some combination of portal guys with 3 years left who haven't done much yet and HS recruits. Nothing to lose there and maybe one would surprise.
 


6'11 215lbs

SeasonTeamConfClassPosGGSMPFGFGAFG%3P3PA3P%2P2PA2P%eFG%FTFTAFT%ORBDRBTRBASTSTLBLKTOVPFPTSAwards
2022-23Florida StateACCFRF15217.31.83.8.4740.51.9.2501.31.9.690.5350.20.7.3000.63.13.70.80.40.51.41.84.3
2023-24Florida StateACCSOF333224.82.86.2.4490.72.5.2932.13.7.553.5071.32.4.5571.23.74.91.40.91.11.53.17.6
2024-25Florida AtlanticAACJRF343430.04.18.5.4861.13.4.3423.05.2.580.5531.92.9.6431.55.57.02.70.81.71.92.411.3
Career826825.63.26.7.4710.92.7.3132.34.0.579.5341.32.3.5881.24.35.51.80.81.21.72.68.5
 
  • Like
Reactions: DR IS IN
Well, I hope the part about "not getting high level guys" is just poor wording!!! I agree not getting the big NAME guys, but I really hope the one we have can play at a high level!

That said, I am sure it was not meant as a slight to who we have and meant more to say not getting the biggest name guys and going with guys with a chip on their shoulder who want to win
Ya think?
 
Not sure we need 4 more. DeVries hasn't shown that he'll play 2 bigs much...Tucker is likely to get 30+ minutes a game, and I'd guess a lot of those will be at the "4" position. I know we're splitting hairs, but I'd say 2 more, definitely, maybe 3. As long as they each provide different abilities and strengths, namely defensive versatility, and rebounding. With how DeVries has chosen to play in the past, 5 bigs seems a little bit like wasted roster spots...that will result in kids portaling out next year. I know he can't realistically play all 13 scholarship guys enough to make them all happy... but seems like getting more guys in what his usual 1-4 spots would be, increases the likelihood we'll need them.

I understand the optimism. DD is a bright offensive mind and we want to see something that is 180* different than what the last two coaches put on the floor. I'm not sure what the expectations are. Talent at the 1 and 5 is hard to come by after the extra covid year. That's reflected with our roster. We have a mid-major all-star roster.

0.5 of 1.2= 41.5% 0.4 of 1.9=21.7% That's still half a 3 on less than 2 attempts. Or a 20% increase for a stretch 5 that's now a "shooter." Opposing players shot over 60% from the field against him last year and he grabbed 1.4 offensive rpg. Reed Bailey and a point guard that can't shoot do not allow you to put 3 other shooters on the floor. Bailey
has potential bust written all over him. You need a helluva lot more than Fredericko Fredericko next to him to hide the holes in his game.

We have half or more of our cash left and 4 holes to fill if you can trust the gossip. Because I believe DD is a
good coach I have to think there's a combination of draft drop outs and waiver guys he knows he's going to get and the holes we have are actually spots being held for a couple of game changers.



.
 
I’m going to do a summary of things tomorrow, people seemed to enjoy that. For now, IU has been in contact with:
Federiko Federiko - Texas Tech
Baba Miller - FAU - tantalizing talent with somewhat underwhelming performance but if you can unlock his potential, he’s an NBA player.
Stephon Payne - Jacksonville - depth forward
Neoklis Avdalas - Greece - 6’8” forward that is unsure if he’s going to college or to the NBA. Very skilled for an 18 year old.
 
I'd love to have the guy you describe, but there are precious few at this point. Dollars to doughnuts we sign a couple guys who have more limited offensive abilities but are rugged and can defend and rebound. Won't surprise me at all if we end up with a guy or two who physically are very similar to Payton Sparks. 6'8"/9"+, 240+ who are physical and bangers. That's what makes the kid who decommitted from ASU so interesting, he has 5 size but appears to be able to fit in with the offensive philosophy you mention. But, given the late hour he's assembling this years roster and that it seems light on frontcourt guys anyway, I think he's going to to sacrifice on offensive/perimeter skills and get some guys who can defend and rebound.
Baba Miller would be perfect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victorbmyboy
Baba Miller would be perfect.
Don't know him from Baba O'Riley, but in TJ's description directly above your post he says "somewhat underwhelming performance"... at FAU? Maybe CDD can reach him and get him to play hard, but that's not a trait that is usually taught. Might be why he took a step down from a defensive-minded program like FSU to FAU. He sounds like a backup option to me, so maybe he and FF.

I still think we'll end up with a guy or 2 who are a bit undersized, but will defend and rebound. Don't have to look any farther than his WVU team last year. Hansberry I think was his starter most of the year and he's 6'8" and 240.
 
god I hope not, good kid but if we need him, we will suck
I wasn't necessarily saying him, but someone like his size. I think guys that are a bit undersized but still have the strength and aggressiveness to play in the post might be a bit easier to find at this late date.
 
As mentioned last night, I started a new thread with a summary of where things stand now that the portal is closed (although new names could become public in the next day or so after entering at the deadline) and what IU's options might be for the final five or six spots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DR IS IN
A name that is rumored to be getting IU interest and potentially visiting: Nick Dorn from Elon. He's a 6'7" wing that has two years remaining.
Dorn is from Charlotte and averaged 15.2 points per game, 3.8 rebounds, shot 35.1 percent from three (on 8.4 attempts per game) and 80.5 from the line (4.5 attempts per game). He had a 1.91 BPR and was a positive offensive and defensive player. Low assist rate but he doesn't turn it over much either. The two years of eligibility makes him particularly appealing.

CONFIRMED: Nick Dorn is at IU today for a visit.
 
Last edited:
A name that is rumored to be getting IU interest and potentially visiting: Nick Dorn from Elon. He's a 6'7" wing that has two years remaining.
Dorn is from Charlotte and averaged 15.2 points per game, 3.8 rebounds, shot 35.1 percent from three (on 8.4 attempts per game) and 80.5 from the line (4.5 attempts per game). He had a 1.91 BPR and was a positive offensive and defensive player. Low assist rate but he doesn't turn it over much either. The two years of eligibility makes him particularly appealing.

CONFIRMED: Nick Dorn is at IU today for a visit.
Not exactly the big IU could use, but his highlights are good. I think Sisely will have to play a lot at the 4.

The offense will be potent next season. Defense? Not so sure.
 
Not exactly the big IU could use, but his highlights are good. I think Sisely will have to play a lot at the 4.

The offense will be potent next season. Defense? Not so sure.
Not good to be counting on a freshman for minutes. Gotta believe CDD will be adding 3 guys to the frontcourt still.
 
Not exactly the big IU could use, but his highlights are good. I think Sisely will have to play a lot at the 4.

The offense will be potent next season. Defense? Not so sure.
This IS NOT a very good apples to apples example...but it does give me a little pause from being "TOO" worried about not getting a bunch more bigs...

One of the best singular lineups in modern basketball history was Golden State's "Death" lineup. Draymond Green, Durant, Curry, Klay, and I think Iguodala.

Couple of points on that...

1) They didn't play that way ALL the time, they still needed Looney for long stretches, and against certain teams.
2) Durant, Green, and Iggy all had really good length for wings.

Just something to throw out there for discussion. I, for sure, think he needs to get some true post depth, at this point. But this latest guy is the type of guy that could bridge that gap, maybe, and lessen that need, a little bit.

And I know that GS lineup included 3-4 future Hall of Fame players on it, so again, not apples to apples...but the point was, playing without a big can work if you have the right kinds of guards/wings doing it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gage Fu
Say we only get 1 more big, but are able to sign a couple more impactful guard/wings.

Potential starting lineup

Conerway, Drake, Wilkerson, DeVries, Bailey

5 guard lineup, sub someone like Dorn and/or Sisley, for Bailey, slide DeVries or Sisley to "5"...depending on who we're playing, that could provide 10-15 minutes or so of effective minutes, here and there.

Fouls, potential injuries, practice competitiveness, etc... are obvious reasons for needing to get more than 1 more big. But if the last few spots are comprised of 6-6+ wing types, that are good, B10 level wing/guards, its not like we won't be able to field an effective team or anything.
 
Not exactly the big IU could use, but his highlights are good. I think Sisely will have to play a lot at the 4.

The offense will be potent next season. Defense? Not so sure.
He's not a big.
Don't know him from Baba O'Riley, but in TJ's description directly above your post he says "somewhat underwhelming performance"... at FAU? Maybe CDD can reach him and get him to play hard, but that's not a trait that is usually taught. Might be why he took a step down from a defensive-minded program like FSU to FAU. He sounds like a backup option to me, so maybe he and FF.

I still think we'll end up with a guy or 2 who are a bit undersized, but will defend and rebound. Don't have to look any farther than his WVU team last year. Hansberry I think was his starter most of the year and he's 6'8" and 240.
Baba Miller is a Spanish basketball player, Baba O'Riley is a song created by and performed by two serial posers.

Fwiw - He's been underwhelming everywhere he played, was on pro draft boards when he first signed with FSU and has never met that lofty expectation. I'm talking about his offensive skill set.

Yes, Hansberry was the starter at 5, he's also mobile and capable of shooting and passing. Which are the two traits I like in Miller. Both had 3pt ratio above 40%, both had assist rates above 10% and neither are slow footed dinosaurs stuck in the low block.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Warison
Well, I hope the part about "not getting high level guys" is just poor wording!!! I agree not getting the big NAME guys, but I really hope the one we have can play at a high level!

That said, I am sure it was not meant as a slight to who we have and meant more to say not getting the biggest name guys and going with guys with a chip on their shoulder who want to win
Maybe he meant guys that know what teamwork and unity mean. Not a bunch of me,me ,me guys.
 
Maybe he meant guys that know what teamwork and unity mean. Not a bunch of me,me ,me guys.
I am sure that is probably it, but it can be interpreted otherwise when he says we did not get "high level guys" I think most on here would interpret it as not highly ranked portal guys, but in the some guys could take that as a slight
 
Say we only get 1 more big, but are able to sign a couple more impactful guard/wings.

Potential starting lineup

Conerway, Drake, Wilkerson, DeVries, Bailey

5 guard lineup, sub someone like Dorn and/or Sisley, for Bailey, slide DeVries or Sisley to "5"...depending on who we're playing, that could provide 10-15 minutes or so of effective minutes, here and there.

Fouls, potential injuries, practice competitiveness, etc... are obvious reasons for needing to get more than 1 more big. But if the last few spots are comprised of 6-6+ wing types, that are good, B10 level wing/guards, its not like we won't be able to field an effective team or anything.
Where are rebounds and post defense play gonna come from to stop 6-11 and 7-0 beefs from posting on them down low? Sisley or Dvries aren't big enough to stop bigs guys pushing them back down low for easy buckets. Gotta get two bigs that can defend and rebound to kick out on fast breaks.
 
I am sure that is probably it, but it can be interpreted otherwise when he says we did not get "high level guys" I think most on here would interpret it as not highly ranked portal guys, but in the some guys could take that as a slight
But IU just did get 3 fairly high rated portal guys in Baily,Wilkerson and DeVries. So we good.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT