I actually liked the energy Sparks brought. If DeVries thought he could make a useful player out of him, it would be interesting to see if he couldn't get some minutes out of him.Payton Sparks is in the portal again 🧐
Last edited:
I actually liked the energy Sparks brought. If DeVries thought he could make a useful player out of him, it would be interesting to see if he couldn't get some minutes out of him.Payton Sparks is in the portal again 🧐
Does he have any eligibility left? 2 at BSU, 1 at IU, and then back to BSU for a year? Was never injured so should not have a RS year. IF he would be willing to come back and has eligibility, he would be the type I would like for the 3rd big to add. That said, no idea how he could get a 5th yearI actually liked the energy sparks brought. If DeVries thought he could make a useful player out of him, it would be interesting to see if he couldn't get some minutes out of him.
I thought he was coming off his freshman year at BSU when he came to IU? Doubtful, I'm just saying I thought he had more to offer than what we got out of him.Does he have any eligibility left? 2 at BSU, 1 at IU, and then back to BSU for a year? Was never injured so should not have a RS year. IF he would be willing to come back and has eligibility, he would be the type I would like for the 3rd big to add. That said, no idea how he could get a 5th year
Nope left after 2 years the first timeI thought he was coming off his freshman year at BSU when he came to IU? Doubtful, I'm just saying I thought he had more to offer than what we got out of him.
I'm not hung up on him, but think he's the type of player that we could get useful minutes out of without breaking the bank. I didn't think it would have been likely anyway, but I felt like he took a lot of heat on here at times, but I liked that he came in and played hard and with emotion even if he was maybe overmatched or misused.Nope left after 2 years the first time
![]()
Payton Sparks College Stats | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com
Payton Sparks - Stats, Game Logs, Splits, and much morewww.sports-reference.com
Solid multiple year guy. I like it. Beat out St John's too... if he's a typical Pitino guard, we're gonna like him, I'm sure.![]()
Jason Drake Joins IU's Growing Roster
The roster for the 2025-2026 Indiana Hoosiers continues to take shape as IU beat out St. John’s for the commitment ofindiana.rivals.com
I agree, I think he would be the ideal 4th big who plays vs certain matchups and plays really hard and physical and would be better if coached right, and put into the proper situations with few expectations. If he is our 4th with Bailey, Fredricko, and Curtis (or similiar types) I would be good with it!I'm not hung up on him, but think he's the type of player that we could get useful minutes out of without breaking the bank. I didn't think it would have been likely anyway, but I felt like he took a lot of heat on here at times, but I liked that he came in and played hard and with emotion even if he was maybe overmatched or misused.
Payton Sparks does not have eligibility left. Like many others, he is entering the portal on the off-chance that a lawsuit against the NCAA limiting eligibility is successful and results in another year. His career is likely over but IF the lawsuit goes against the NCAA, these guys want to have entered the portal so they would have options. Nearly every school is proceeding as if those players will not be eligible and are not pursuing them.I agree, I think he would be the ideal 4th big who plays vs certain matchups and plays really hard and physical and would be better if coached right, and put into the proper situations with few expectations. If he is our 4th with Bailey, Fredricko, and Curtis (or similiar types) I would be good with it!
Well, I hope the part about "not getting high level guys" is just poor wording!!! I agree not getting the big NAME guys, but I really hope the one we have can play at a high level!A quote I saw on X from Jason Drake:
“They’re not getting all the high level guys, they’re getting guys that are trying to win and are about the right thing and everybody is pretty selfless. I feel like that’s the way you build a winning team and winning culture.”
He doesn't fit. Slow footed low post player, and from what I've seen from DD teams that's not something he uses much, if at all. Ideally his bigs need to run the floor and be able to shoot. Players like Sparks, can't do that. Coach is firmly in 2025 on team building and offensive philosophy, not stuck in the 90s power post era.I actually liked the energy sparks brought. If DeVries thought he could make a useful player out of him, it would be interesting to see if he couldn't get some minutes out of him.
Hope we have a real chance at Curtis and Fredricko as bigs. Maybe a back up PF yet.Sill have 5 left I think.Payton Sparks does not have eligibility left. Like many others, he is entering the portal on the off-chance that a lawsuit against the NCAA limiting eligibility is successful and results in another year. His career is likely over but IF the lawsuit goes against the NCAA, these guys want to have entered the portal so they would have options. Nearly every school is proceeding as if those players will not be eligible and are not pursuing them.
I'd love to have the guy you describe, but there are precious few at this point. Dollars to doughnuts we sign a couple guys who have more limited offensive abilities but are rugged and can defend and rebound. Won't surprise me at all if we end up with a guy or two who physically are very similar to Payton Sparks. 6'8"/9"+, 240+ who are physical and bangers. That's what makes the kid who decommitted from ASU so interesting, he has 5 size but appears to be able to fit in with the offensive philosophy you mention. But, given the late hour he's assembling this years roster and that it seems light on frontcourt guys anyway, I think he's going to to sacrifice on offensive/perimeter skills and get some guys who can defend and rebound.He doesn't fit. Slow footed low post player, and from what I've seen from DD teams that's not something he uses much, if at all. Ideally his bigs need to run the floor and be able to shoot. Players like Sparks, can't do that. Coach is firmly in 2025 on team building and offensive philosophy, not stuck in the 90s power post era.
Packline defense and those players really don't fit well either, they can't recover off a hard hedge with them, so they can't hard hedge effectively, they have to play drop coverage.. Which opens Hope Solo like gaps in the middle of the defense, which is not good for a packline defense. He hasn't always hedged ballhandlers, probably due to personnel but it would be nice to have the option.I'd love to have the guy you describe, but there are precious few at this point. Dollars to doughnuts we sign a couple guys who have more limited offensive abilities but are rugged and can defend and rebound. Won't surprise me at all if we end up with a guy or two who physically are very similar to Payton Sparks. 6'8"/9"+, 240+ who are physical and bangers. That's what makes the kid who decommitted from ASU so interesting, he has 5 size but appears to be able to fit in with the offensive philosophy you mention. But, given the late hour he's assembling this years roster and that it seems light on frontcourt guys anyway, I think he's going to to sacrifice on offensive/perimeter skills and get some guys who can defend and rebound.
On what basis is there a claim for more eligibility? Simply that they've already allowed other players to have extra years? They probably should have seen that would come back to bite them.Payton Sparks does not have eligibility left. Like many others, he is entering the portal on the off-chance that a lawsuit against the NCAA limiting eligibility is successful and results in another year. His career is likely over but IF the lawsuit goes against the NCAA, these guys want to have entered the portal so they would have options. Nearly every school is proceeding as if those players will not be eligible and are not pursuing them.
Jason Drake is a new entry and he's visiting IU today. Drake is transferring from Drexel, played 26.1 minutes per game, shot 39.6% from three on three attempts per game (101 total this season). He had 3.1 assists per game and is 6'2". He played the 2022-2023 season at Cleveland State, played the 2023-2024 season at Butler Community College and then played this past season at Drexel.
He was at -1.7 BPM this season at Drexel per Bart Torvik's model.
Not sure we need 4 more. DeVries hasn't shown that he'll play 2 bigs much...Tucker is likely to get 30+ minutes a game, and I'd guess a lot of those will be at the "4" position. I know we're splitting hairs, but I'd say 2 more, definitely, maybe 3. As long as they each provide different abilities and strengths, namely defensive versatility, and rebounding. With how DeVries has chosen to play in the past, 5 bigs seems a little bit like wasted roster spots...that will result in kids portaling out next year. I know he can't realistically play all 13 scholarship guys enough to make them all happy... but seems like getting more guys in what his usual 1-4 spots would be, increases the likelihood we'll need them.
Season | Team | Conf | Class | Pos | G | GS | MP | FG | FGA | FG% | 3P | 3PA | 3P% | 2P | 2PA | 2P% | eFG% | FT | FTA | FT% | ORB | DRB | TRB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | PTS | Awards |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022-23 | Florida State | ACC | FR | F | 15 | 2 | 17.3 | 1.8 | 3.8 | .474 | 0.5 | 1.9 | .250 | 1.3 | 1.9 | .690 | .535 | 0.2 | 0.7 | .300 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 4.3 | |
2023-24 | Florida State | ACC | SO | F | 33 | 32 | 24.8 | 2.8 | 6.2 | .449 | 0.7 | 2.5 | .293 | 2.1 | 3.7 | .553 | .507 | 1.3 | 2.4 | .557 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 7.6 | |
2024-25 | Florida Atlantic | AAC | JR | F | 34 | 34 | 30.0 | 4.1 | 8.5 | .486 | 1.1 | 3.4 | .342 | 3.0 | 5.2 | .580 | .553 | 1.9 | 2.9 | .643 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 11.3 | |
Career | 82 | 68 | 25.6 | 3.2 | 6.7 | .471 | 0.9 | 2.7 | .313 | 2.3 | 4.0 | .579 | .534 | 1.3 | 2.3 | .588 | 1.2 | 4.3 | 5.5 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 8.5 |
Ya think?Well, I hope the part about "not getting high level guys" is just poor wording!!! I agree not getting the big NAME guys, but I really hope the one we have can play at a high level!
That said, I am sure it was not meant as a slight to who we have and meant more to say not getting the biggest name guys and going with guys with a chip on their shoulder who want to win
Not sure we need 4 more. DeVries hasn't shown that he'll play 2 bigs much...Tucker is likely to get 30+ minutes a game, and I'd guess a lot of those will be at the "4" position. I know we're splitting hairs, but I'd say 2 more, definitely, maybe 3. As long as they each provide different abilities and strengths, namely defensive versatility, and rebounding. With how DeVries has chosen to play in the past, 5 bigs seems a little bit like wasted roster spots...that will result in kids portaling out next year. I know he can't realistically play all 13 scholarship guys enough to make them all happy... but seems like getting more guys in what his usual 1-4 spots would be, increases the likelihood we'll need them.
I understand the optimism. DD is a bright offensive mind and we want to see something that is 180* different than what the last two coaches put on the floor. I'm not sure what the expectations are. Talent at the 1 and 5 is hard to come by after the extra covid year. That's reflected with our roster. We have a mid-major all-star roster.
0.5 of 1.2= 41.5% 0.4 of 1.9=21.7% That's still half a 3 on less than 2 attempts. Or a 20% increase for a stretch 5 that's now a "shooter." Opposing players shot over 60% from the field against him last year and he grabbed 1.4 offensive rpg. Reed Bailey and a point guard that can't shoot do not allow you to put 3 other shooters on the floor. Bailey
has potential bust written all over him. You need a helluva lot more than Fredericko Fredericko next to him to hide the holes in his game.
We have half or more of our cash left and 4 holes to fill if you can trust the gossip. Because I believe DD is a
good coach I have to think there's a combination of draft drop outs and waiver guys he knows he's going to get and the holes we have are actually spots being held for a couple of game changers.
.
Baba Miller would be perfect.I'd love to have the guy you describe, but there are precious few at this point. Dollars to doughnuts we sign a couple guys who have more limited offensive abilities but are rugged and can defend and rebound. Won't surprise me at all if we end up with a guy or two who physically are very similar to Payton Sparks. 6'8"/9"+, 240+ who are physical and bangers. That's what makes the kid who decommitted from ASU so interesting, he has 5 size but appears to be able to fit in with the offensive philosophy you mention. But, given the late hour he's assembling this years roster and that it seems light on frontcourt guys anyway, I think he's going to to sacrifice on offensive/perimeter skills and get some guys who can defend and rebound.
god I hope not, good kid but if we need him, we will suckI actually liked the energy sparks brought. If DeVries thought he could make a useful player out of him, it would be interesting to see if he couldn't get some minutes out of him.
Don't know him from Baba O'Riley, but in TJ's description directly above your post he says "somewhat underwhelming performance"... at FAU? Maybe CDD can reach him and get him to play hard, but that's not a trait that is usually taught. Might be why he took a step down from a defensive-minded program like FSU to FAU. He sounds like a backup option to me, so maybe he and FF.Baba Miller would be perfect.
I wasn't necessarily saying him, but someone like his size. I think guys that are a bit undersized but still have the strength and aggressiveness to play in the post might be a bit easier to find at this late date.god I hope not, good kid but if we need him, we will suck
Not exactly the big IU could use, but his highlights are good. I think Sisely will have to play a lot at the 4.A name that is rumored to be getting IU interest and potentially visiting: Nick Dorn from Elon. He's a 6'7" wing that has two years remaining.
Dorn is from Charlotte and averaged 15.2 points per game, 3.8 rebounds, shot 35.1 percent from three (on 8.4 attempts per game) and 80.5 from the line (4.5 attempts per game). He had a 1.91 BPR and was a positive offensive and defensive player. Low assist rate but he doesn't turn it over much either. The two years of eligibility makes him particularly appealing.
CONFIRMED: Nick Dorn is at IU today for a visit.
Not good to be counting on a freshman for minutes. Gotta believe CDD will be adding 3 guys to the frontcourt still.Not exactly the big IU could use, but his highlights are good. I think Sisely will have to play a lot at the 4.
The offense will be potent next season. Defense? Not so sure.
I hear that, but Sisley played well for Montverde. He's better prepared than most incoming freshmen.Not good to be counting on a freshman for minutes. Gotta believe CDD will be adding 3 guys to the frontcourt still.
This IS NOT a very good apples to apples example...but it does give me a little pause from being "TOO" worried about not getting a bunch more bigs...Not exactly the big IU could use, but his highlights are good. I think Sisely will have to play a lot at the 4.
The offense will be potent next season. Defense? Not so sure.
He's not a big.Not exactly the big IU could use, but his highlights are good. I think Sisely will have to play a lot at the 4.
The offense will be potent next season. Defense? Not so sure.
Baba Miller is a Spanish basketball player, Baba O'Riley is a song created by and performed by two serial posers.Don't know him from Baba O'Riley, but in TJ's description directly above your post he says "somewhat underwhelming performance"... at FAU? Maybe CDD can reach him and get him to play hard, but that's not a trait that is usually taught. Might be why he took a step down from a defensive-minded program like FSU to FAU. He sounds like a backup option to me, so maybe he and FF.
I still think we'll end up with a guy or 2 who are a bit undersized, but will defend and rebound. Don't have to look any farther than his WVU team last year. Hansberry I think was his starter most of the year and he's 6'8" and 240.
Maybe he meant guys that know what teamwork and unity mean. Not a bunch of me,me ,me guys.Well, I hope the part about "not getting high level guys" is just poor wording!!! I agree not getting the big NAME guys, but I really hope the one we have can play at a high level!
That said, I am sure it was not meant as a slight to who we have and meant more to say not getting the biggest name guys and going with guys with a chip on their shoulder who want to win
I am sure that is probably it, but it can be interpreted otherwise when he says we did not get "high level guys" I think most on here would interpret it as not highly ranked portal guys, but in the some guys could take that as a slightMaybe he meant guys that know what teamwork and unity mean. Not a bunch of me,me ,me guys.
Where are rebounds and post defense play gonna come from to stop 6-11 and 7-0 beefs from posting on them down low? Sisley or Dvries aren't big enough to stop bigs guys pushing them back down low for easy buckets. Gotta get two bigs that can defend and rebound to kick out on fast breaks.Say we only get 1 more big, but are able to sign a couple more impactful guard/wings.
Potential starting lineup
Conerway, Drake, Wilkerson, DeVries, Bailey
5 guard lineup, sub someone like Dorn and/or Sisley, for Bailey, slide DeVries or Sisley to "5"...depending on who we're playing, that could provide 10-15 minutes or so of effective minutes, here and there.
Fouls, potential injuries, practice competitiveness, etc... are obvious reasons for needing to get more than 1 more big. But if the last few spots are comprised of 6-6+ wing types, that are good, B10 level wing/guards, its not like we won't be able to field an effective team or anything.
But IU just did get 3 fairly high rated portal guys in Baily,Wilkerson and DeVries. So we good.I am sure that is probably it, but it can be interpreted otherwise when he says we did not get "high level guys" I think most on here would interpret it as not highly ranked portal guys, but in the some guys could take that as a slight