ADVERTISEMENT

Our offense is poor

We are pretty much at the half way point of our season and I would say that Romeo should return for his second season. He is not close to being ready for the rigors of the NBA but yes, he has great potential especially if he fixes that jump shot. And most importantly, I think he knows he is not ready.
I don’t think he’s ready, either, but in this day and age of greed, it doesn’t matter. He can work on his outside shot while getting paid to do so. He has been blessed with too much hype to do otherwise. I’m old enough to remember when a college player wishing to enter the draft early had to prove hardship on the home front in order to be accepted. Some tried it, were accepted and then didn’t get drafted. It was S-Outta-Luck time for them- they couldn’t go back to college ball even if they wanted to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glidresquirrel
So how many AA did Archie have on the elite 8 team at Dayton. How many AA did he have on a Dayton team that finished the year with 6 healthy scholarship players with no player over 6'6 and still made the tournament.
Archie has made it past the first weekend of the tournament one time and he’s now in his 8th year. That was the Elite 8 run where they got a good matchup with Stanford the 10 seed in the sweet 16. Let’s not forget Tom Crean made a Final Four run.

I believe in Archie but only if he can stack teams like his brother does. That’s the key.
 
There is nearly 100 years of coaching and playing experience among the IU coaches, yet you, who plays message board coach a few hours a week knows better. Do you realize how foolish you look with such statements? I’ve asked you before, but you never answered. What is your experience regarding basketball that would make me respect your opinion?
I’m not saying I know more or am better, just that his fellow coaches seem to be better. At least at the in game moves and prep work.

My skills have nothing to do with it as I don’t coach against him.
 
I don’t think he’s ready, either, but in this day and age of greed, it doesn’t matter. He can work on his outside shot while getting paid to do so. He has been blessed with too much hype to do otherwise. I’m old enough to remember when a college player wishing to enter the draft early had to prove hardship on the home front in order to be accepted. Some tried it, were accepted and then didn’t get drafted. It was S-Outta-Luck time for them- they couldn’t go back to college ball even if they wanted to.

ya, it was better when these young adults had no say in their career choices at all. let's scrap NBA free agency while you are at it.

age of greed? ya, it was all milk and honey 50 years ago. only difference was the NBA hadn't gotten huge yet. lol. you kill me, Abraxis!
 
Archie has made it past the first weekend of the tournament one time and he’s now in his 8th year. That was the Elite 8 run where they got a good matchup with Stanford the 10 seed in the sweet 16. Let’s not forget Tom Crean made a Final Four run.

I believe in Archie but only if he can stack teams like his brother does. That’s the key.
Well being at Dayton for most of those years you shouldn't expect to get past the first weekend that many times.
 
I have to go with goiu on this one......

Although Poole and Morgan both looked great against IU, I think Morgan was the best college player on the floor last night. We can argue about #2, but for now let's say it's Romeo. I think Michigan then has the next 6 (in no particular order, Matthews, Poole, Livers(who DNP), Treske, Brazdekis, and Simpson).

Rob would probably be next, if he was available.

I think its clear from the season so far, and ultra clear after last night, that Smith, Green, and Durham are nothing more than role players, and that none is going to be more than that this year. The Johns kid, who has barely played for UM this year, is as good as Smith as an inexperienced freshman.

That said, we can still be darn good this year if Smith, Green, and Durham develop into rock solid role players. It seems to me that Smith and Durham are getting there........not sure we'll ever be able to count on Green in any particular game.
i agree with your assessment of smith, green and durham. the big ten is full of players with similar ability. they will not set us apart but hopefully as seniors will give us some advantage. except maybe green who may be beyond hope
 
  • Like
Reactions: ufo33
The offense we have is geared towards players that can create their own shot off the dribble, which is a reflection of how the game has evolved. I would agree that the personnel IU has right now doesn't fit that overall. Romeo and Rob can create their own shot, Green can sometimes, and Juwan can certainly create his own shot in the post. Part of the problem is IU doesn't have a bunch of consistent shooters, either, and shooting opens things up.

This team needs something like a motion offense to get players open through screens, movement, cutting, and smarts. Maybe the offense should just run through Morgan in the post since he is about automatic down there. If teams want to play Romeo straight up, then have him do what he did at the start of the 2nd half against Illinois. Rob needs to be more unselfish in scoring. Hunter would have helped as another scorer.
rob is too selfish? wtf
 
Hot Take special: He's the bizarro college version of Mike D'antoni. Always has great talent, but whereas D'Antoni always leans solely on Great O, Miller tries to solely lean on great D, but is single-focused and can't adjust to ever break-through to a championship level.
 
I don’t think he’s ready, either, but in this day and age of greed, it doesn’t matter. He can work on his outside shot while getting paid to do so. He has been blessed with too much hype to do otherwise. I’m old enough to remember when a college player wishing to enter the draft early had to prove hardship on the home front in order to be accepted. Some tried it, were accepted and then didn’t get drafted. It was S-Outta-Luck time for them- they couldn’t go back to college ball even if they wanted to.
So choosing the option to make millions of dollars to play a game rather than stay in college to play that same game is greedy? I call it a wise decision, one you obviously never had to make. Even if the player washes out of the NBA after 1 season (which a lottery draft pick wouldn't) the money he makes in that one season would be enough to pay for his college degree with some left over.

"Too much hype to do otherwise"? So he's being forced to leave for the NBA? So which is it, is he greedy or a pawn with no control over his life and life decisions?

Then you seem to long for the "good ole days" when players couldn't leave early even if they wanted to. You're all over the place in this post and none of it is good.
 
Hot Take special: He's the bizarro college version of Mike D'antoni. Always has great talent, but whereas D'Antoni always leans solely on Great O, Miller tries to solely lean on great D, but is single-focused and can't adjust to ever break-through to a championship level.
Terrific post o_O
 
Hmm. "None of it is good" probably is accurate from the standpoint of fairness, etc. However, as a college basketball fan, I hate today. The joy of college bball was to see teams and players progress through the years. That is gone. You cannot have your best players progress or you will not be competitive because the best go pro early. Thus, I really no longer like men's college basketball. I watch and root for the Hoosiers as I always have, but my passion is long gone. I have turned to the women's team as they will be here a while, and their brand of basketball is good - if below the rim. Maybe there will be a time when you also like the "good ole days?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: glidresquirrel
I don’t think he’s ready, either, but in this day and age of greed, it doesn’t matter. He can work on his outside shot while getting paid to do so. He has been blessed with too much hype to do otherwise. I’m old enough to remember when a college player wishing to enter the draft early had to prove hardship on the home front in order to be accepted. Some tried it, were accepted and then didn’t get drafted. It was S-Outta-Luck time for them- they couldn’t go back to college ball even if they wanted to.
That was brutal and wrong to young men, the colleges loved it because it kept them in college longer.
 
Hmm. "None of it is good" probably is accurate from the standpoint of fairness, etc. However, as a college basketball fan, I hate today. The joy of college bball was to see teams and players progress through the years. That is gone. You cannot have your best players progress or you will not be competitive because the best go pro early. Thus, I really no longer like men's college basketball. I watch and root for the Hoosiers as I always have, but my passion is long gone. I have turned to the women's team as they will be here a while, and their brand of basketball is good - if below the rim. Maybe there will be a time when you also like the "good ole days?"
I like to watch High School and NBA because that is where you can watch the top talent play for more than 1 season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glidresquirrel
Hot Take special: He's the bizarro college version of Mike D'antoni. Always has great talent, but whereas D'Antoni always leans solely on Great O, Miller tries to solely lean on great D, but is single-focused and can't adjust to ever break-through to a championship level.
LOL! posters like you were the reason I took a vacation from the basketball board, He has been here for a year and a half and coached around 60 games but you already know he can't win at a championship level. Go look at Belein's first few years at UM and see it took him a few years before he started winning consistently.
 
LOL! posters like you were the reason I took a vacation from the basketball board, He has been here for a year and a half and coached around 60 games but you already know he can't win at a championship level. Go look at Belein's first few years at UM and see it took him a few years before he started winning consistently.
Oh my god! I feel you. It’s as bad over at the U.K. board. Meltdown city. Do people not understand that we have played zero games at full strength. Yet here we are in the top 25 with 1 loss in the B1G. Give this team a chance people! Give our young coach a chance.
 
Oh my god! I feel you. It’s as bad over at the U.K. board. Meltdown city. Do people not understand that we have played zero games at full strength. Yet here we are in the top 25 with 1 loss in the B1G. Give this team a chance people! Give our young coach a chance.
It's like that with some people man, everyone is just tired of underachieving as a program.

I think Archie is doing a fine job with this team, there were just a lot of ridiculous expectations coming into the season by a lot of people and the injuries have killed this team's depth.
 
That was brutal and wrong to young men, the colleges loved it because it kept them in college longer.
Yes, it seems that way now, but back then it was the societal norm and a college education was more valued than it is today. You have a different view of reality now than what I had when your age. People then were just glad that those in financial need had a quick way out. George McGinnis was one who benefitted. His dad was tragically killed in a construction accident after George graduated from high school. Anyway, yeah, it may seem brutal now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: glidresquirrel
We went up 14 spots in offensive efficiency yesterday. From 47th to 33rd nationally. Now at 37th after early games today...

How is that possible?

Because some of you are idiots who don't understand we played against a top 4 defense in their house, and that defense is allowed to actually move. Dumb fans always act like the other team is made of cardboard cut outs with no will of their own.

This whole thread sucks balls and is filled with the idiot ramblings of the perpetually stupid..

Intelligent fanbase my ass..
 
Last edited:
Archie has made it past the first weekend of the tournament one time and he’s now in his 8th year. That was the Elite 8 run where they got a good matchup with Stanford the 10 seed in the sweet 16. Let’s not forget Tom Crean made a Final Four run.

I believe in Archie but only if he can stack teams like his brother does. That’s the key.


Beilein took 13 years to take a D1 team past the round of 32. And by his 4th year at Michigan, it looked like he was never going to amount to much there.

IU needs to play tougher but I am not writing Archie off for losing to #1, #2,(both on the road), and a 3rd road game on a last second miss.
 
Archie’s game coaching leaves a lot to be desired. And unfortunately we’re going to take a big step backwards in talent next year. I think we’re looking at 2021 before we have a decent chance to be nationally competitive.
You are so over the top and full of it. You had to have been a looper back in the day. At the very least, Archie is better than the slop Knight was slinging from '94 on.
 
Knight was done in the last 8 years of his career, he was too busy hunting. Terrific coach, but he was far past his prime to coach a basketball team.
Fishing too. Most of those recruits where scouted and brought in by his assistants. Knight got lazy.
 
We are pretty much at the half way point of our season and I would say that Romeo should return for his second season. He is not close to being ready for the rigors of the NBA but yes, he has great potential especially if he fixes that jump shot. And most importantly, I think he knows he is not ready.

What does being ready for the NBA mean? Ready to play 10 minuites per night, 30 minutes a night, to be an all star?

Dejounte Murray wasn't ready but played in 38 NBA games going back and forth between the Spurs and their G-League team. He played around 1000 minutes as a pro in his 1st year out of college. He played meaningful minutes in the playoffs as a rookie. He played 81 games and 21 mpg as a 2nd year player and made all NBA 2nd team defense.

Romeo is strong, has great body control, defends. If Trae Young, Lonzo or Fox can handle it, I think Romeo will be fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: minneman
He calls very few sets out of timeouts or out of bounds. It’s purely a motion offense where you rely on having more talent. That’s why he usually wins games he should and typically loses games he should. He’s not going to out scheme anyone. And we seem to always come out flat.

These coaches (like his brother) rely on a TON of talent to make this work. Like UK, Duke, Arizona talent. If he can do that we’ll be fine. If not we won’t out scheme many teams with Archie imo.

Again, everything is on recruiting. Get the best players and his style of just letting them play will work.

I'm trying to remember the "TON" of talent he had at Dayton during his E8 run... or the next three years where he went 76-25.
 
We went up 14 spots in offensive efficiency yesterday. From 47th to 33rd nationally. Now at 37th after early games today...

How is that possible?

Because some of you are idiots who don't understand we played against a top 4 defense in their house, and that defense is allowed to actually move. Dumb fans always act like the other team is made of cardboard cut outs with no will of their own.

This whole thread sucks balls and is filled with the idiot ramblings of the perpetually stupid..

Intelligent fanbase my ass..

65th.

https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-basketball/stat/offensive-efficiency
 
Last edited:
There was an entire season of basketball coached by Davis after Knight left before the title game run.

So, with that thinking, I guess this season is still Creans fault?

Davis gets credit for Donald Perry, plus losing Haston and Owens.
 

36th currently. Team Rankings and Sports Reference don't take schedule strength into account. Which is fine for NBA teams as there's only 30 and they play a balanced schedule. When you have 354 teams with unbalanced schedules an SOS weight in some form has to be applied to mean anything.

Plus anytime a coach, announcer, analyst (or I) quote efficiency stats - it's kenpom.

Sports Reference, Team Rankings and Hoops Math all have their uses, but team efficiency stats are not one of them. Kenpom is viewed by everyone as the gold standard.

Well, unless you can afford the $8500 yearly subscription price for Synergy. then you have what our (and everyone else's) coaching staff has.

Link Kenpom
 
Last edited:
I’m not saying I know more or am better, just that his fellow coaches seem to be better. At least at the in game moves and prep work.

My skills have nothing to do with it as I don’t coach against him.
You don’t watch enough basketball to say that. “Game moves and prep work” is all you need to say to prove my point. You don’t even know how idiotic that sounds.
 
LOL! RMK had nothing to do with that team going to the championship game. Half of those players never played an minute for him and he never let Coverdale off the bench.
Not to mention they ran an NBA style offense. Shot more threes than RMK would’ve ever allowed. I remember how bad of a player odle was. He became a solid player under Davis. Knight had him so tight he was terrible.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT