You missed their boycott of Disney.
Yes, arson, property destruction, etc should be punished regardless of political motivations.
OK lefties . . .
- Thread starter CO. Hoosier
- Start date
Yes, arson, property destruction, etc should be punished regardless of political motivations.
I am not from the Fort,just pastor here. I will not put this place down. They have a Giordano's,Portillos,and Skyline chili. They have minor league baseball too, and a good zoo.
Any place with Skyline Chili is good by me. I wish I could eat Portillos-unfortunately, it would send me into a diabetic coma
I had skyline chili back when IU basketball was good. Can't say I liked it at all.
Portillos has some good options but the best options would kill me.
Last time i went to Skyline Chile a half naked woman asked us " have you ever seen Ace Ventura?" Before we could answer she turned around, bent over and started talking out of her butt like the movie..........actually now i am thinking it happened at a place called Poor Johns. I wouldn't eat a hot dog at either place though
All for prosecuting these nuts, but shouldn't this be a local or state matter? If someone vandalized a bunch of Ford pickup trucks, that would be a local matter, right? What makes this a federal case? I'm interested in the legal opinions.
3 alleged Tesla attackers could face up to 20 years for Molotov cocktails
Three individuals are facing "serious charges" for allegedly using Molotov cocktails to set Tesla items on fire, the Justice Department announced.
www.usatoday.com
illegally possessing an unregistered destructive device. This was a few weeks ago that they were arrested.All for prosecuting these nuts, but shouldn't this be a local or state matter? If someone vandalized a bunch of Ford pickup trucks, that would be a local matter, right? What makes this a federal case? I'm interested in the legal opinions.
3 alleged Tesla attackers could face up to 20 years for Molotov cocktails
Three individuals are facing "serious charges" for allegedly using Molotov cocktails to set Tesla items on fire, the Justice Department announced.www.usatoday.com
All for prosecuting these nuts, but shouldn't this be a local or state matter? If someone vandalized a bunch of Ford pickup trucks, that would be a local matter, right? What makes this a federal case? I'm interested in the legal opinions.
3 alleged Tesla attackers could face up to 20 years for Molotov cocktails
Three individuals are facing "serious charges" for allegedly using Molotov cocktails to set Tesla items on fire, the Justice Department announced.www.usatoday.com
"Domestic terrorism."
It's Elon, the president's biggest donor, so he gets the full support and resources of Trump's DOJ.
Interstate commerce. Magic wordsAll for prosecuting these nuts, but shouldn't this be a local or state matter? If someone vandalized a bunch of Ford pickup trucks, that would be a local matter, right? What makes this a federal case? I'm interested in the legal opinions.
3 alleged Tesla attackers could face up to 20 years for Molotov cocktails
Three individuals are facing "serious charges" for allegedly using Molotov cocktails to set Tesla items on fire, the Justice Department announced.www.usatoday.com
I could have looked at the indictment to see the charges, but didn't notice one was linked in the article. Here it is:
Nelson indictment
www.documentcloud.org
Makes sense now. I suppose the incidents where they're spray painting or shit staining Teslas would be a local matter.
Better if it’s a federal conviction. Then the next Democratic president can pardon them… And the beat goes on.All for prosecuting these nuts, but shouldn't this be a local or state matter? If someone vandalized a bunch of Ford pickup trucks, that would be a local matter, right? What makes this a federal case? I'm interested in the legal opinions.
3 alleged Tesla attackers could face up to 20 years for Molotov cocktails
Three individuals are facing "serious charges" for allegedly using Molotov cocktails to set Tesla items on fire, the Justice Department announced.www.usatoday.com
God I hope not. I'm all done with pardons from both sides.
I used to think the power of pardon was one of the dumbest things granted to the president. Then when Agent Orange brought his scourge of vendettas, I suddenly realized the point, to prevent an autocratic dictator from imprisoning his enemies without grounds.
It's always the chanting, and the singing, and the uncomfortable dumb jokes.
Dorks. Nerds. Social outcasts.
Can't imagine being a shitlib in Southlake, TX 😄
Dorks. Nerds. Social outcasts.
Can't imagine being a shitlib in Southlake, TX 😄
One issue is did the perps go across state lines to do their dastardly deeds? Then it is federal.
Conservatives sure know how to stage their videos. Your google search history must be pretty disturbing.
I am all for that as long as it's done equally when compared to other crimes
No way would I do that. I'm not that big of a gambler. It was lower in 2023 than it is now so it might be a good bet.
This equally thing is a red herring deal. A guy commits a crime in Ohio, and another guy commits the same crime (same charge) in Indiana. The resulting sentence is very much unlikely to be identical. All the circumstances won't be identical. The judge, jury, prosecutor and defending attorney won't be identical. So, when one guy gets 10 years and the other 5, some will point to that and scream that justice isn't equal. Of course, it isn't. That's our system of justice.
Screaming that rioters at BLM protests and J6 rioters weren't being treated the same is of course true but entirely irrelevant. Different circumstances, different law enforcement (local, state, or federal), different cops, different judges, different, different, different. I want all rioters to meet justice appropriate to their crimes.
I am not sure either Trump would see that as ethically wrong. The parts of the government that look for fraud were the first to go. He seems to have a very laissez faire attitude about how people acquire money. Or at least how he acquires it, maybe it would not extend to Musk. But I think it would. I suspect if push came to shove it would be very hard to prove $500 million to Trump's PAC was a quid pro quo. We had a quid pro quo in the phone call to Ukraine and even hearing it most Republicans said it was ok. Why would this be different?
The Floyd rioters who faced federal charges tended to have much harsher outcomes than local/state. The J6 people screwed up and committed their crime on federal property.
Quite a few of the Floyd protestors were arrested for lower level "violating curfew" charges. No one stops to think of course they didn't get years in federal prison.
Anyone who destroyed property or attacked people in either case deserved prison.
I think you've accepted the anti-Musk narrative pumped out by the Dems without thinking about this too deeply.
Why would what be different? What exact act has Musk taken to benefit himself financially that you have proof of? How is this any different than all the speculation about the Biden quid pro quos from the foreign companies that gave money to Hunter and his brother?
That was "very hard to prove" too. Minus a smoking gun, no Democrat would even admit it was fishy. Does the same standard apply here?
If Musk breaks the law and steals govt data to benefit his business, he should go to jail and disgorge any profits he makes from said theft. I've asked multiple people for evidence of this, and no one has provided any yet. Plus, I'm just not sure why the richest man in the world would risk that. Musk already gets plenty of consumer data from X and Tesla. What consumer data, trends, etc. is he taking from all these files he has access to (like thousands of other govt employees) and how, exactly, is it going to help him?
Apples to oranges. The lion’s share of Floyd rioters would have been subject to state crimes - largely in counties with Soros DAs
