Too much depends on the coin toss.
Did they?Yes, that is exactly why they changed the college rules.
The problem (and to the original poster’s point) is that Penix and Atlanta’s offense never had a chance to take the field in OT.I don't mind the NFL OT rules since they've changed it from a pure sudden death format a few years back.
They had four quarters to winThe problem (and to the original poster’s point) is that Penix and Atlanta’s offense never had a chance to take the field in OT.
I know. I don't mind the NFL rules in the context of how they run OT, i.e., a 10 minute period that can end in a tie. Before they switched, you could win with a FG only on your first possession. That would look crazy now with how routinely guys are kicking 60 yd FGs. Now, you at least get a chance on offense if the first possession results in a FG. First possession TD ending the game? I'm okay with it, again in the context of how they do it and because I think it's a big improvement over the previous sudden death rules. They're never going to allow multiple periods for sure. Maybe they'll get rid of the tie & move to the current college rules?The problem (and to the original poster’s point) is that Penix and Atlanta’s offense never had a chance to take the field in OT.
That is what I have always hated. Both teams should each have the ball in overtime.The problem (and to the original poster’s point) is that Penix and Atlanta’s offense never had a chance to take the field in OT.
As did Washington. But because they won the toss they had the advantage.They had four quarters to win
This tweet in the article is really interesting.https://www.si.com/nfl/2022/01/24/nfl-overtime-rules-playoff-stats-coin-toss-chiefs-bills Old article but wow. Didn’t know it was that bad. Back then 10 out of 11 teams that won the toss won the game. A 50/50 coin toss that has nothing to do with ability has that much influence on the game? That’s just silly.