I understand that, and I can agree. (Although I agree more about Rogers who redshirted his first year. As the other poster said, Knight was highly talked about as a FR and played and had the talent to play TE when we were short there, so could say he didn't develop all the much.) But shouldn't the state of the current OL -- the 5 guys we have now consisting of a SR, 2 RS-SR's, a JR and a RS-SO matter more than just Rogers and Knight? Or at least cancel a lot of that out? I mean, we can't run at all. One of the reasons he played well against OSU in the past was our OL.....they ended up beating us, and beating our D down, but we scored points against them. But not with this group.