My guess is with Fernando, all options are on the table, especially against the more tuff teams
Just saw a NFL mock draft that reported Rourke would be a 6th round pick and ran a 4.63 40 - the second fastest of the top 6 rounds of QB’s.Rourke’s 2 issues (which are understandable seeing that he was playing on a bad ACL) were:
1. Almost no mobility. Sudfeld-like. You watch these other games whether it was Notre Dame or Ohio State or half a dozen other teams and they all had quarterbacks that could run out of trouble. Rourke couldn’t do that.
2. I don’t think I ever saw him throw a ball away. I’m sure there were some but, man, it seemed like every time he got under pressure. He just kind of ducked down and got sacked. We can point to the offensive line, but in many of these other games, there were quarterbacks that were pressured, but they were able to get out on the run and throw the ball or escape trouble and move down field with her legs.
This thread makes me ask again:
Did Cig decide to run RPO and go get Rourke, or did he get Rourke and then decide to run RPO?
Good question- all I know is what a stud CR was for IU this year - what an amazing season he had - a true warrior.
His name is Kurtis, not Curtis. 🤦♂️CR was a warrior for IU this past season and I bet Mendoza will be an upgrade with the coaching he will get at IU.
CR was a warrior for IU this past season and I bet Mendoza will be an upgrade with the coaching he will get at IU.
I believe that will be in the playbook. He has an asset why not use it at important times.So not a scramble for big yards or QB called runs?
The Pac12 and ACC are not the MAC. As I've thoroughly explained above, he accomplished WAY MORE in his 1st 2 seasons at Cal than Rourke did at Ohio, and did it against much better competition. He's an obvious upgrade.If he is truly an upgrade (due to KR's limited mobility due to injury) then we're in for some serious fireworks on the Offensive side he f the ball...
I'm a wait and see what he does on the field kind of guy though... The Big Ten schedule is a whole different animal than what he's been seeing (for the most part)...
He's saying all the right things in his interviews, let's see if he is going to "walk the walk" when it counts both in preparation and eventually, on Game Day...
I think Miami is paying Beck about 2x what we are paying Mendoza. Not an easy recruitment for us to win, they have a lot of NIL. Great job from the staff.Miami and Georgia both thought enough of him to come after him. That’s good enough for me until we get on the field.
He also played in the ACC which is a pretty terrible conference. Still thrilled to get him yet it's not the big ten.Mendoza had a 69% passing completion. Mendoza also passed for 3004 yards behind a weak oline that allowed him to be sacked on the regular.
To have the poise AND escapability to operate behind that line, tells me he will thrive and flourish behind a good oline. I can't wait till fall because he could absolutely lead Indiana right back to the CFP.
The ACC isn't good but neither was the MAC the B1G and Rourke adjusted well. I bet Mendoza reacts well to the coaching and offense here too.He also played in the ACC which is a pretty terrible conference. Still thrilled to get him yet it's not the big ten.
The ACC isn't good but neither was the MAC the B1G and Rourke adjusted well. I bet Mendoza reacts well to the coaching and offense here too.
Where did you find those numbers? I’d like to see a list.I think Miami is paying Beck about 2x what we are paying Mendoza. Not an easy recruitment for us to win, they have a lot of NIL. Great job from the staff.
I would too but there is no list. NBC and SI report $3-4M for Beck. I read somewhere Fernando’s ask was around $1.8M and someone close to IU told me that too so as far as I can tell it’s somewhere in that range.Where did you find those numbers? I’d like to see a list.
ThisI think Mendoza is an upgrade because he's done it against better competition than Rourke, whom I really liked. I think this will show up in games against the big boys where, let's face it, Rourke did not play well.
This is an excellent analysis. THANK YOU for collating all this info!Here are the postseason honors for the QB's Cig has coached over the years:
CFN Big Ten Offensive Transfer of the Year
Kurtis Rourke, QB, Indiana
CFN Big Ten Quarterback of the Year
Kurtis Rourke, Indiana
CFN First-Team All-Big Ten
QB: Kurtis Rourke, Indiana
*He was 2nd team everywhere else, but CFN loved him like I loved him, so I added all their accolades*
All-Sun Belt First Team Offense
QB – Jordan McCloud, James Madison (RS Sr., QB – Tampa, Fla.)
All-Sun Belt Second Team Offense
QB – Todd Centeio, James Madison (Gr., QB – West Palm Beach, Fla.)
2021 CAA Football First Team Offense Player, School Pos. Class Hometown Cole Johnson, James Madison QB Sr. Virginia Beach, Va.
*In 2020 the CAA canceled the season due to Covid*
2019 CAA Football First Team Offense Player, School Pos. Class Hometown Ben DiNucci, James Madison QB Sr. Wexford, Pa.
PSAC 2012 Offensive Player of the Year – Harvey Tuck, IUP
He was also the QB coach for Phillip Rivers at NC St. and he also recruited Russell Wilson there. Saban called him the QB whisperer during his time at Bama. Rourke played this season on only 1 ACL, got his wife pregnant with twins, broke his thumb, had surgery to fix his thumb, only missed one game, and still had one of the greatest seasons in school history statistically. He also led us to our most wins ever to start a season, most wins ever in a season, and into the playoffs for the 1st time in history. Those are enormous shoes to fill for Mendoza, and who knows if he will be able to match or exceed Rourke's historic season? That wasn't the question though.
The question asked was if Mendoza was an upgrade, downgrade, or a wash over Rourke? Mendoza, who is younger and has played less football than Rourke did before he transferred to IU, had better stats against better competition (ACC vs MAC) when they were the same age, and is now the best QB talent that Cig has ever had as a head coach. There's no opinion in that observation either. Here are their career passing stats:
Kurtis Rourke Career Stats
CMP ATT CMP% YDS AVG TD INT LNG RTG 222 320 69.4 3,042 9.5 29 5 84 176.0 195 307 63.5 2,207 7.2 11 5 50 132.5 244 353 69.1 3,256 9.2 25 4 75 167.7 171 261 65.5 1,817 7.0 11 7 66 132.5 30 44 68.2 386 8.8 3 0 58 164.4
Fernando Mendoza Career Stats
CMP ATT CMP% YDS AVG TD INT LNG SACK RTG 153 243 63.0 1,708 7.0 14 10 54 16 132.8 265 386 68.7 3,004 7.8 16 6 66 41 144.6
Rourke clearly excelled in years 3-5, with year 5 being by far his best ever season while under Cig at IU. Mendoza played a lot more early on at Cal than Rourke did, so his stats dwarf what Rourke put up in his 1st 2 years at Ohio. Mendoza also did this against much better competition playing in the PAC12 as a frosh, and in the ACC as a soph. Mendoza threw for 4,712 yards passing and 30 TD's in his 1st 2 seasons. Rourke threw for 2,203 yards passing and 14 TD's in his 1st 2 seasons. Mendoza's resume after 2 seasons blows Rourke's away when you factor in that he also did it against much better competition. There is no doubt that Mendoza is by far the best QB talent that Cig has ever had, and there is no doubt that Cig does a phenomenal job coaching up QB's and getting the best out of them. That qualifies as a solid upgrade to me.
I am not saying he isnt awesome. If you looked at my past posts when we got him I said he was the number 1 QB in the portal. Im just saying that Rourke was a beast and the big ten is several steps up from the ACC. They are trash. That's all.The ACC isn't good but neither was the MAC the B1G and Rourke adjusted well. I bet Mendoza reacts well to the coaching and offense here too.
2nd one... He ran RPO at JMU prior to coming here... It's part of his Offense...
IU ran tons of RPOs this season.Just saw a NFL mock draft that reported Rourke would be a 6th round pick and ran a 4.63 40 - the second fastest of the top 6 rounds of QB’s.
Off an ACL.
He was absolutely fast enough for RPO college ball. In part because he read stuff so quick.
He would beat Sudfeld, and Gibran Hamdan.
The Big Ten is several steps above the MAC.I am not saying he isnt awesome. If you looked at my past posts when we got him I said he was the number 1 QB in the portal. Im just saying that Rourke was a beast and the big ten is several steps up from the ACC. They are trash. That's all.