ADVERTISEMENT

Mendoza: Upgrade? Downgrade? or Wash?

Rourke’s 2 issues (which are understandable seeing that he was playing on a bad ACL) were:

1. Almost no mobility. Sudfeld-like. You watch these other games whether it was Notre Dame or Ohio State or half a dozen other teams and they all had quarterbacks that could run out of trouble. Rourke couldn’t do that.

2. I don’t think I ever saw him throw a ball away. I’m sure there were some but, man, it seemed like every time he got under pressure. He just kind of ducked down and got sacked. We can point to the offensive line, but in many of these other games, there were quarterbacks that were pressured, but they were able to get out on the run and throw the ball or escape trouble and move down field with her legs.
Just saw a NFL mock draft that reported Rourke would be a 6th round pick and ran a 4.63 40 - the second fastest of the top 6 rounds of QB’s.

Off an ACL.

He was absolutely fast enough for RPO college ball. In part because he read stuff so quick.

He would beat Sudfeld, and Gibran Hamdan.
 
CR was a warrior for IU this past season and I bet Mendoza will be an upgrade with the coaching he will get at IU.

If he is truly an upgrade (due to KR's limited mobility due to injury) then we're in for some serious fireworks on the Offensive side of the ball...

I'm a wait and see what he does on the field kind of guy though... The Big Ten schedule is a whole different animal than what he's been seeing (for the most part)...

He's saying all the right things in his interviews, let's see if he is going to "walk the walk" when it counts both in preparation and eventually, on Game Day...
 
Last edited:
If he is truly an upgrade (due to KR's limited mobility due to injury) then we're in for some serious fireworks on the Offensive side he f the ball...

I'm a wait and see what he does on the field kind of guy though... The Big Ten schedule is a whole different animal than what he's been seeing (for the most part)...

He's saying all the right things in his interviews, let's see if he is going to "walk the walk" when it counts both in preparation and eventually, on Game Day...
The Pac12 and ACC are not the MAC. As I've thoroughly explained above, he accomplished WAY MORE in his 1st 2 seasons at Cal than Rourke did at Ohio, and did it against much better competition. He's an obvious upgrade.
 
Rourke set a standard that will be difficult for Mendoza, or any future IU QB, to achieve. Let’s hope he has as good a feel for pocket pressure, knowing when to slide up, right/left in the pocket. Hopeful he can put up similar numbers in wins and passing, while occasionally getting out of trouble with his legs, the kind that Rourke couldn’t due to injury. Tall order.
 
Mendoza had a 69% passing completion. Mendoza also passed for 3004 yards behind a weak oline that allowed him to be sacked on the regular.

To have the poise AND escapability to operate behind that line, tells me he will thrive and flourish behind a good oline. I can't wait till fall because he could absolutely lead Indiana right back to the CFP.
 
Mendoza had a 69% passing completion. Mendoza also passed for 3004 yards behind a weak oline that allowed him to be sacked on the regular.

To have the poise AND escapability to operate behind that line, tells me he will thrive and flourish behind a good oline. I can't wait till fall because he could absolutely lead Indiana right back to the CFP.
He also played in the ACC which is a pretty terrible conference. Still thrilled to get him yet it's not the big ten.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT