ADVERTISEMENT

Men can get pregnant

I saw that video yesterday. The look on Bishops face???

The funniest thing are these puzzled looks the person asking the question gives when they get the answer. Remember when Blackburn asked Jackson to define a woman? That look and then "You can't?"

I would prolly do a full on Tom Hanks when the bathtub went down in the money pit.

 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
You are the target Fox News demo.
Why does it matter who reported it, I saw it on multiple outlets and it was the same video of her saying what she said? I understand it is easy to deflect based on which media outlet released it due to their stance, but in this case you could hear it on any of them and it was the same outcome.
 
So Bishop did his job and got the sound bite.....

Sigh.

Was there anything in there related to access to abortion? Which is, you know, what the hearing was about.

No?

Damn fine reporting Fox.

And y'all bitch about the MSM, whatever that is anymore.
Fox???????

This was completely blown up by about every news source yesterday on twitter. And you cannot make this sh!t up either. A few years ago were these questions that had possibilities of yes answers? Who in the f*ck planted these worthless, waste of a soul, dumbasses in this country anyways?

When Roy questioned Robinson on the timer she wasted half the time with bullsh!t and tried to make it a soapbox rather than discuss the pieces of human being she brought out aborting a 20 week old pregnancy. She would not answer his questions!
 
Why does it matter who reported it, I saw it on multiple outlets and it was the same video of her saying what she said? I understand it is easy to deflect based on which media outlet released it due to their stance, but in this case you could hear it on any of them and it was the same outcome.
That’s not my point. Fox News exists to be an outrage machine of largely worthless limited topics to people who are outraged by the same. See the OP and his topic starting history.
 
That’s not my point. Fox News exists to be an outrage machine of largely worthless limited topics to people who are outraged by the same. See the OP and his topic starting history.
Confusing the holy hell out of young people and kids isn’t largely worthless. These people are dealing with mental illness in all the wrong ways. It’s a real problem.
 
That’s not my point. Fox News exists to be an outrage machine of largely worthless limited topics to people who are outraged by the same. See the OP and his topic starting history.
Right. So does CNBC and the like. I think it was CNBC that had a commentator on just the other day who said the entire Republican Party needs to be labeled a terrorist organization.

That’s no different than Fox and may actually be worse.
 
and get abortions. Dems have lost their minds.

The question was dumb to begin with.

Typical political grandstanding during committee hearings.

So she went balls to the wall with her answer (or lack thereof), which was an over the top absolute extreme example of something she believes is possible.

The whole situation was dumb. And those are our political 'leaders'.
 
That’s not my point. Fox News exists to be an outrage machine of largely worthless limited topics to people who are outraged by the same. See the OP and his topic starting history.
You don’t like being called out, do you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crayfish57
November.

That clip will play in a lot of October GOP campaign commercials.

Biology-denying race baiters who destroy economies and weaken our military must be voted out.

Make America America Again
How is our military weaker?
 
The question was dumb to begin with.

Typical political grandstanding during committee hearings.

So she went balls to the wall with her answer (or lack thereof), which was an over the top absolute extreme example of something she believes is possible.

The whole situation was dumb. And those are our political 'leaders'.
We have the leaders we deserve.
 
The question was dumb to begin with.

Typical political grandstanding during committee hearings.

So she went balls to the wall with her answer (or lack thereof), which was an over the top absolute extreme example of something she believes is possible.

The whole situation was dumb. And those are our political 'leaders'.
The question is the result of her prior answer. "I think everyone can identify for themselves." F*ck this horseshit. Who in the hell are these idiots. And f*ck anyone who wants to be listed as anything but a man or a woman. How in the hell did shit get so whacked?
 
How is our military weaker?
Putin has no fear of us. China has no fear of us. We’re a quiet mouse. Doesn't matter if we have numbers or weapons. Our government is focused on ridding itself of The Deplorables instead of representing and defending all citizens or democracy or capitalism.

We’re being led by The Prom Committee.
 
The question was dumb to begin with.

Typical political grandstanding during committee hearings.

So she went balls to the wall with her answer (or lack thereof), which was an over the top absolute extreme example of something she believes is possible.

The whole situation was dumb. And those are our political 'leaders'.
It was dumb, but based on her previous comment I get where she's coming from.

She said that anyone can identify as a man/woman. She didn't say anything about actual biological/anatomical gender.

If you agree that anyone can identify as a man (as she stated she does), then a person with female genitalia who identifies as a man can get an abortion.

I'm not saying it's good or bad. Just that I can see where she's coming from/why she said that.
 
The question is the result of her prior answer. "I think everyone can identify for themselves." F*ck this horseshit. Who in the hell are these idiots. And f*ck anyone who wants to be listed as anything but a man or a woman. How in the hell did shit get so whacked?
I know you have reading comprehension issues, but HER ANSWER was the result of HIS QUESTION. Not the other way around. You're at least 0-2 today, chief.

Aimee Arrambide, the executive director of the abortion rights nonprofit Avow Texas, was asked by Rep. Dan Bishop, R-N.C., to define what "a woman is," to which she responded, "I believe that everyone can identify for themselves."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ohio Guy
Putin has no fear of us. China has no fear of us. We’re a quiet mouse. Doesn't matter if we have numbers or weapons. Our government is focused on ridding itself of The Deplorables instead of representing and defending all citizens or democracy or capitalism.

We’re being led by The Prom Committee.
Who told you China/Putin doesn't fear us? Numbers and weapons are a big 'effing deal. The strongest military by far and the ability to destroy the planet 100x over is pretty 'effing scary.
 
It was dumb, but based on her previous comment I get where she's coming from.

She said that anyone can identify as a man/woman. She didn't say anything about actual biological/anatomical gender.

If you agree that anyone can identify as a man (as she stated she does), then a person with female genitalia who identifies as a man can get an abortion.

I'm not saying it's good or bad. Just that I can see where she's coming from/why she said that.
Absolutely. That's clear to anyone with a brain. The question I have is, why do all of these grumpy old white men on this board care either way???? WTF does it matter to you if your neighbor has a vulva but considers themselves a man? WTF do you care? Did said vulva owner come to your house and hold a gun to your head to try to convince you to identify as something other than what you prefer?
 
Putin has no fear of us. China has no fear of us. We’re a quiet mouse. Doesn't matter if we have numbers or weapons. Our government is focused on ridding itself of The Deplorables instead of representing and defending all citizens or democracy or capitalism.

We’re being led by The Prom Committee.
Yeah I can’t get there with you on that. That sounds like Tucker Talking Points. Fearing is different - and immeasurable - from Respecting.
 
Absolutely. That's clear to anyone with a brain. The question I have is, why do all of these grumpy old white men on this board care either way???? WTF does it matter to you if your neighbor has a vulva but considers themselves a man? WTF do you care? Did said vulva owner come to your house and hold a gun to your head to try to convince you to identify as something other than what you prefer?
It's probably a lot of latent/repressed feelings and urges they're forced to deal with when this topic comes up.
 
I know you have reading comprehension issues, but HER ANSWER was the result of HIS QUESTION. Not the other way around. You're at least 0-2 today, chief.

Aimee Arrambide, the executive director of the abortion rights nonprofit Avow Texas, was asked by Rep. Dan Bishop, R-N.C., to define what "a woman is," to which she responded, "I believe that everyone can identify for themselves."
Exactly what the f*ck kind of an answer is that. Identifies as. I'll stand by my take.
 
Until reading this thread, not a single one of us has ever heard of Aimee Arrambide. Yet, whatever she says suddenly represents all Democrats, everywhere, and shows that they have all lost their minds. Makes sense. :rolleyes:
 
Right. So does CNBC and the like. I think it was CNBC that had a commentator on just the other day who said the entire Republican Party needs to be labeled a terrorist organization.

That’s no different than Fox and may actually be worse.
They are all outrage machines. If another poster starts a new topic thread everyday based on the outrages reported on those channels I’ll say the same thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeke4ahs
Confusing the holy hell out of young people and kids isn’t largely worthless. These people are dealing with mental illness in all the wrong ways. It’s a real problem.
I don’t disagree. But starting threads everyday (and only one sided) about stupid people saying stupid things isn’t so productive IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vesuvius13
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT