Sounds like plans are in the works already.
I cannot see the article but they recently collected feedback on premium seating and other enhancements. Before Covid there was enough interest in leasing suites on the east side but that was tabled with the bugdet issues at the time. I suspect we will soon hear about opportunities to get those suites going. Lots of businesses in Indy are interested.
Yes, that was the plan pre Cignetti. Now they should be reconsidering that. At least get it up to 60,000 at this time and plan for more later if Cig hangs around and makes IU a regular football contender.Article mentions no additional seating at this time. If that holds true, huge mistake.
I’m fairly certain that’s why they added the field level and Sample Terrace “suites” in the SEZ. Trial type thing with temporary suites (and pricing) to gauge interest. It’s been a complete success.I cannot see the article but they recently collected feedback on premium seating and other enhancements. Before Covid there was enough interest in leasing suites on the east side but that was tabled with the bugdet issues at the time. I suspect we will soon hear about opportunities to get those suites going. Lots of businesses in Indy are interested.
Could be. Those suites come from a vendor that manages these tents at several stadiums. You can’t see shit that low in the end zone so they are good for entertaining guests that are not all that into the game. You are right though they have been successfulI’m fairly certain that’s why they added the field level and Sample Terrace “suites” in the SEZ. Trial type thing with temporary suites (and pricing) to gauge interest. It’s been a complete success.
Please seats with backs.amen, don't need more seats though, just seats and amenities, u of l over built, 50k full and seats in demand is much better than 65 with 10 k empty
You lose a decent amount of capacity -- Cal went from 72K to 62K just by adding individual seats and bench backs in place of bleachers. Of course it's a case by case basis depending on the renovation.Do you think you lose much seating capacity if they did something like chair back seats in the sections below the lower entry or sections either side of the fifty? May premium price some of us out of our current seats?
I am sure the comfy chairs will happen and displace some folks with really good seats. Not a fun process.You lose a decent amount of capacity -- Cal went from 72K to 62K just by adding individual seats and bench backs in place of bleachers. Of course it's a case by case basis depending on the renovation.
I'm pretty sure some sections around the 50 will be converted to premium individual seats or at least bench backs. Sort of like a larger version of the Henke Hall of Champs seats in the north end zone.
I would guess some bleachers will be added to offset capacity loss. The corners can be filled in where the green matts are, the south endzone has quite a bit of space that could be seats, and I'd guess the east side may be built up a little higher, new suites will probably go there too someday. We'll see.
Exactly. Illinois is too big. Louisville overbuilt too. No point in building a stadium that is only full for two or three games per year.amen, don't need more seats though, just seats and amenities, u of l over built, 50k full and seats in demand is much better than 65 with 10 k empty
Nippert is a cool stadium. I like the outdoor loge seating vs all behind glass. Some version of that would be sweet.The press box is sooo outdated. It needs to be torn down and then rebuilt with a bunch of suites that stretch from end zone to end zone on the west side. Stack them 4 suites high and add some loge seating as well. There's no better way to make $$ than to add more premium seating offerings. I'd much rather see us upgrade the stadium, amenities, bathrooms, and big screens all before we worry about increasing the stadium to seat 75K.
I think something like what Cincinnati did would be a great model for IU to improve upon: https://www.aro.net/nippert-stadium/
One thing I loved about the Nebraska game was sitting 50 yard line row 13 and stood the entire game. Comfy seats are going to make it way too easy for the old f—-ers to sitI am sure the comfy chairs will happen and displace some folks with really good seats. Not a fun process.
I'm sure it'll end up being something like the Wake pictures, and what you describe.Nippert is a cool stadium. I like the outdoor loge seating vs all behind glass. Some version of that would be sweet.
My guess is they're going to build up behind the east stands, something like the below, though with our signature limestone accented design/architecture that looks really good. It's easier to do this on the east side vs. the west side. But as you said the press box for sure needs to be updated too, which could make a case for some west sides suites as well? Idk.
Could happen. The East and West stands are 65 years old, if there are useful life considerations and it’s hard to retrofit them with premium seating, we may see a larger project and those stands rebuilt.I'm sure it'll end up being something like the Wake pictures, and what you describe.
If I were them, I'd do something on both sides though. Put a really nice building, like the Wake building, on the West side, with the top of it being a big endzone to endzone press box/suites. Even if that means cutting out the top 10+ rows.
Then add a concourse building on the east side, and build a small upper deck above it. Again, even if you need to cut out some of the top rows.
Replace some of the lower bleacher seating with nicer individual seats.
Obviously tie both sides in will with the North and South End Zone structures.
Ending capacity still in the low 50s. A huge nice press box, a bunch of nice suites. Much better concourses with some restaurants and more bathrooms and concession areas.
Depends on how they do it. Vandy has been playing in the stadium while their renovations are on going. Not sure if that's feasible with whatever the details would end up being, or not. Northwestern showed that temporary stadiums can be pulled off, but I'm not sure there's anything in or around Bloomington that would be as marketable as the Lake front stadium they whipped up.Where would they play while these renovations are going on?
They played there all during both the north and south end zone renovations. Should be able to manage it again.Where would they play while these renovations are going on?
With the sun shining into the east stands, I think you'd want to tear down the old press box and add suites to the west side 1st. The appetite and $$ is there to fill those things, and that's the most $/Sq Ft IU can make. The press box is a dump and we need suites more than we need another stand and adding capacity. The pics you shared above are cool as well. There are a lot of options and I'm sure a high end architecture firm would come up with something that will blow us all away.Nippert is a cool stadium. I like the outdoor loge seating vs all behind glass. Some version of that would be sweet.
My guess is they're going to build up behind the east stands, something like the below, though with our signature limestone accented design/architecture that looks really good. It's easier to do this on the east side vs. the west side. But as you said the press box for sure needs to be updated too, which could make a case for some west sides suites as well? Idk.
I heard there were pre-covid plans for east side suites, but that’s a good point on the sun, maybe the suites go on the west side after all. I have no idea and am happy either way.With the sun shining into the east stands, I think you'd want to tear down the old press box and add suites to the west side 1st. The appetite and $$ is there to fill those things, and that's the most $/Sq Ft IU can make. The press box is a dump and we need suites more than we need another stand and adding capacity. The pics you shared above are cool as well. There are a lot of options and I'm sure a high end architecture firm would come up with something that will blow us all away.
That’d be a home run plan. Until recently, I’d have said “not a chance in h that happens!” Now, I’m not so sure. Dolson is showing his chops. And the prez is right there with him. She actually visited the SEZ suite next to mine last game. Pretty cool to see her excited about the sport before basketball. 😉I'm sure it'll end up being something like the Wake pictures, and what you describe.
If I were them, I'd do something on both sides though. Put a really nice building, like the Wake building, on the West side, with the top of it being a big endzone to endzone press box/suites. Even if that means cutting out the top 10+ rows.
Then add a concourse building on the east side, and build a small upper deck above it. Again, even if you need to cut out some of the top rows.
Replace some of the lower bleacher seating with nicer individual seats.
Obviously tie both sides in will with the North and South End Zone structures.
Ending capacity still in the low 50s. A huge nice press box, a bunch of nice suites. Much better concourses with some restaurants and more bathrooms and concession areas.
I’d hope they don’t hire the crew that did the SEZ. Although it’s nice and serves the overall purpose, I still don’t think it meshes nearly as well as the NEZ. Kinda looks like an afterthought comparatively speaking.With the sun shining into the east stands, I think you'd want to tear down the old press box and add suites to the west side 1st. The appetite and $$ is there to fill those things, and that's the most $/Sq Ft IU can make. The press box is a dump and we need suites more than we need another stand and adding capacity. The pics you shared above are cool as well. There are a lot of options and I'm sure a high end architecture firm would come up with something that will blow us all away.
I think they stick to using the stadium during construction. The renovation may not affect the seating bowl very much, in which case fans just have to navigate some construction. If they are going to do serious work on the east and west stands, I’d guess they try to get most of that done in the springs/summers to minimize the impact to games.Where would they play while these renovations are going on?
It’s sort of silly the SEZ was built and they still have all this open space and temporary tent suites on the field. It looks okay, but they could have built more permanent premium seating with the option to add more general seating if demand was there. That’s some valuable space not used so well, probably fixable if they want but I am not sure. Not a big deal though.I’d hope they don’t hire the crew that did the SEZ. Although it’s nice and serves the overall purpose, I still don’t think it meshes nearly as well as the NEZ. Kinda looks like an afterthought comparatively speaking.
It wouldn’t be ideal for students, but it’d be a 17-minute drive for me. 😂I think they stick to using the stadium during construction. The renovation may not affect the seating bowl very much, in which case fans just have to navigate some construction. If they are going to do serious work on the east and west stands, I’d guess they try to get most of that done in the springs/summers to minimize the impact to games.
I kinda doubt they play a season at Lucas Oil. That would stink.
All guesses on my part.
Before making all these expensive, structural stadium changes, including increasing seating capacity to 75 K as suggested, we might want to wait and see how sustainable our very recent success proves to be. I remember how big ticket demand was the latter half of the “Rags to Riches” season and into the following ‘68-‘69 season. What was discovered is that disappointment breeds disinterest. Let’s wait and see how this all plays out, figuratively and literally, so speaketh David Downer, brother of Debbie.The press box is sooo outdated. It needs to be torn down and then rebuilt with a bunch of suites that stretch from end zone to end zone on the west side. Stack them 4 suites high and add some loge seating as well. There's no better way to make $$ than to add more premium seating offerings. I'd much rather see us upgrade the stadium, amenities, bathrooms, and big screens all before we worry about increasing the stadium to seat 75K.
I think something like what Cincinnati did would be a great model for IU to improve upon: https://www.aro.net/nippert-stadium/
Expanding on your points 10 and 11...If I were IU, I'd consider some of the following:
1) Expand suites, loge boxes, club seating, and press box. Could be done on west and/or east side, and additional permanent high-end seating at the field level.
2) Replace a good % of bench seats with seat backs. Say 25-50%. This would reduce capacity substantially, so it would require adding seating elsewhere.
3) Lower some of the higher walls near the corners of the end zones and fill those in with additional seats (the areas where you see that fake grass and IU Health advertisements. It would only provide a small increase in seating but would look much better.
4) The top level of the SEZ is really underutilized. All the space use iterations we've seen of that space in the short time it has been around let's us know that it just wasn't designed well from the start. Get rid of the tents and empty rooftop look with additional suites and standard seating.
5) Fill in the weird gaps between the stands and SEZ with additional seating or at least something aesthetically pleasing. Trees, plants, branding.
6) To the extent possible, follow the aesthetics of the NEZ which is far and away the most attractive portion of the stadium.
7) Double the number of bathrooms and concessions.
8) Keep the capacity between 53-58k. Design for the option of future expansion
9) Expand the used space in the concourses on the east side all the way to the fence surrounding the stadium
10) Build a new football-only facility next to Mellencamp.
11) Follow the lead of Notre Dame and other stadiums and include classroom and office space in any additions. This allows you to build a more 365 building and beautify it in process.
12) Get a modern sound system
13) Get a modern LED lighting system that actually has color capability. The AD went cheap a few years ago and bought us lighting technology from the early auts. We've seen incredible gameday vibes created with creative lightning and sound displays at Bama, UGA, Tennessee, South Carolina, and a few others. Catch up.
I totally agree and would want expanding our capacity to 75K to be at the very bottom on our stadium upgrade to-do list. The suites would be sold on multi year leases, so a bad season wouldn't diminish the income immediately. Cig might not be taking us to the CFP every year, but we also won't be pining for 6-6 and the motor city bowl. 9-3 as a baseline would mean MS is sold out every home game. I believe that is totally within Cig's abilities to achieve.Before making all these expensive, structural stadium changes, including increasing seating capacity to 75 K as suggested, we might want to wait and see how sustainable our very recent success proves to be. I remember how big ticket demand was the latter half of the “Rags to Riches” season and into the following ‘68-‘69 season. What was discovered is that disappointment breeds disinterest. Let’s wait and see how this all plays out, figuratively and literally, so speaketh David Downer, brother of Debbie.
I think a practice facility/football complex is the most important facility upgrade needed. I'm going to look like I'm a UC Bearcat fan, but they are very close to us geographically, in stadium size, and are in a P4 conference. I believe that IU is a much better job, mostly due to being in the B10, but UC is kicking our ass with their stadium and practice facilities. They are way ahead of us, but the $$ is there if we keep winning and selling out MS. I guarantee that the most optimistic budget ever made by the athletic dept for 2024 has been absolutely blown out of the water already, and we still have 1 more home game left. We are talking going from like a $30,000,000 projection to a $60,000,000 haul from football. That's program changing $$ that will get reinvested in facilities and coaches salaries. While the price tag on UC's practice facility was like $130,000,000, Penn St is about to start a $700,000,000 stadium renovation. We can join the facilities arms race if we sellout all our home games every fall.Expanding on your points 10 and 11...
Do sensible things to improve press box, add luxury suites, improve some of the premium seating, and create better concourses. I would, for sure, try to create structures that can be utilized outside football season, as you pointed out.
But make sure you have money in the kitty to replace Mellencamp with a new indoor practice facility.
The post below about waiting to see how sustainable this success is...there are a lot of "chicken or the egg" type elements at play. I'd strongly contend that modernizing the stadium AND then wowing with a new practice facility will help attract recruits and coaching candidates, which will help sustain our new found national relevance.
The alternative is waiting to see how it goes, and be completely dependent on the coaching staffs. I say strike while the irons hot.
Agree totally. And maybe this isn't financially or logistically feasible, but why not tie in to one or both of our world class schools, and make the practice facility also an academic facility for the school of medicine and/or the business school? Lots of very cool potential things for sports medicine and/or sports management in such a building?!I think a practice facility/football complex is the most important facility upgrade needed. I'm going to look like I'm a UC Bearcat fan, but they are very close to us geographically, in stadium size, and are in a P4 conference. I believe that IU is a much better job, mostly due to being in the B10, but UC is kicking our ass with their stadium and practice facilities. They are way ahead of us, but the $$ is there if we keep winning and selling out MS. I guarantee that the most optimistic budget ever made by the athletic dept for 2024 has been absolutely blown out of the water already, and we still have 1 more home game left. We are talking going from like a $30,000,000 projection to a $60,000,000 haul from football. That's program changing $$ that will get reinvested in facilities and coaches salaries. While the price tag on UC's practice facility was like $130,000,000, Penn St is about to start a $700,000,000 stadium renovation. We can join the facilities arms race if we sellout all our home games every fall.
https://ipf.gobearcats.com/