crazy, Cronin's a good coachSpeaking of mediocre coaching.... Pick Cronin, despite his consistent "making the grade" has more talent than any other team in the league.
Talk about getting 180 horsepower from your V8 engine. That guy would be worse than McCaffrey if you took all his money grubbing primadonnas away from UCLA.
I'm hoping Dolson is reading my posts. If he's smart enough to hire Cignetti, then he should be smart enough to see that even Mike Davis could take that UCLA team to the Sweet 16. Cronin isn't even close to challenging for the league title with his 10 RSCI top 100 players.
I hope they play Drake in the first round (because of course IU, if they get in, will play Ole Miss or TTU).
I think Painter is a good coach. I think he’s done a subpar job this year. Edey made Painter look great. Many pundits thought they’d be better.
His audition tonight didn’t look goodcrazy, Cronin's a good coach
I think if you talk to Painter, he will tell you the opposite, that NIL has actually helped him in recruiting, it has allowed him to figure out fast which players want to play basketball on a team, versus somebody more concerned about their back pocket, so they can make a nightly Taco Bell run! All Painter keeps doing is winning! Is NIL more important than winning? Seems like you read this forum, NIL and first round draft picks are IU's goal, not winning! And this century is evidence to just that.They stumbled for the conference, but they will be a four seed or whatever. Not bad.
Painter is a very good coach. Their main issue is so far in the NIL era they can't get good enough talent, which lowers their ceiling.
Thanks for the stupid reply. Keep chugging that Kool-Aid.I think if you talk to Painter, he will tell you the opposite, that NIL has actually helped him in recruiting, it has allowed him to figure out fast which players want to play basketball on a team, versus somebody more concerned about their back pocket, so they can make a nightly Taco Bell run! All Painter keeps doing is winning! Is NIL more important than winning? Seems like you read this forum, NIL and first round draft picks are IU's goal, not winning! And this century is evidence to just that.
NIL has only been around since 2021 and the main reason PU really excelled was Edey. PU got away with paying him only $1M/yr when he was worth $2.5-3M/yr. He was literally the perfect player, a NPOY willing to play for a big discount. Someone like him isn’t coming around again.I disagree T.H. You can look at IU's season and draw a direct correlation to it potentially turning around. When the decision was made to not bring Woodson back, and the pressure was off for him to appease certain players (and their network they came from--- aau programs, agents, etc) IU began playing better. It is apparent that IU is better with guys like Leal, Galloway and Goode out there as opposed to Mgbako and whatever is going on with Tucker. I would not write off Purdue just yet. Explain to me how Painter has not excelled in the NIL era. They were in the title game last year and have a team that will most likely end up a 3 or 4 seed this year. Next year they will start the season as a top 10 team. If a few of their wings can make a jump they will be really good.