I hope he gets another pick but dems control the senate and pull a spineless turtle on him.If he gets another pick I look forward to the total meltdowns on this board. It will be epic.
I hope he gets another pick but dems control the senate and pull a spineless turtle on him.If he gets another pick I look forward to the total meltdowns on this board. It will be epic.
They are trying to do it with Dems today as well. NBC has posted the same article about Newsome saying Trans women shouldn't compete in sports against biological women every hour since he said it yesterday.Oh, they've been reminded alright. Posobiec and Loomer are all over her.
Do you think anyone will disappear for a year like you did after the 2022 elections?
Such an impasse will happen again. Assuredly.I hope he gets another pick but dems control the senate and pull a spineless turtle on him.
IANAL but I don't think thats how that works.Be happy you’re on an anonymous message board. You say that shit in the public sphere and you’d be out everything you own real quick for defamation.
Who’s “we?”We hoped you would disappear but no such luck.
Thinking ACB is a "left leaning judge" is pure ignorance.Such an impasse will happen again. Assuredly.
And I’m not sure what the country will do when judges can’t get appointed.
In a perfect world, the President will appoint someone more palatable to the party that controls the senate.
Instead of Garland, Obama should have nominated someone like ACB for example. Still a left leaning judge, but one you can steal some Republican votes for.
But we see the world through different lenses my friend. I’m a hard partisan, Conservative. I make no bones about that. I’m not putting on airs to pretend to be some sort of diplomatic moderate.That you think that ACB is a "left leaning judge" proves your ignorance.
He has to be trolling. Nobody is that stupid.Thinking ACB is a "left leaning judge" is pure ignorance.
You're an ignoramus. Stupid as well. Your handle is as stupid as you are.But we see the world through different lenses my friend. I’m a hard partisan, Conservative. I make no bones about that. I’m not putting on airs to pretend to be some sort of diplomatic moderate.
You are a big government, big pharma self labeled “Conservative” who can’t actually name any government function they’re willing to see done away with.
You see why we differ on ACB. You are much more leftist than myself. Much more leftist than most Democrat’s I know to be honest.
He's is 100 percent that stupid.He has to be trolling. Nobody is that stupid.
There was no issue with Garland's resume and spineless turtle didn't even say there was (wouldn't even let it come up for debate).Such an impasse will happen again. Assuredly.
And I’m not sure what the country will do when judges can’t get appointed.
In a perfect world, the President will appoint someone more palatable to the party that controls the senate.
Instead of Garland, Obama should have nominated someone like ACB for example. Still a left leaning judge, but one you can steal some Republican votes for.
I certainly have some libertarian leanings, you got that right.You're an ignoramus. Stupid as well. Your handle is as stupid as you are.
You're some sort of loosertarian MAGA combo and your ignorant about most everything you have strong opinions about. Why do you think your opinions are post-worthy? Don't answer - you're stupid and aren't smart enough to realize how stupid you are.
Everything in your second paragraph is false. Nothing but a lie. I have no clue how or why you pulled "big pharma" out of your ass. I'm guessing it's because you're actually a clinical idiot.
ACB is a conservative and you are a fool.
Just STFU.
I hope, pray that Trump gets another shot at an appointment.
Can anyone say Mike Lee? Ted Cruz?
Your last sentence doesn't say what you think it says.I certainly have some libertarian leanings, you got that right.
You’ll have to forgive my intense distrust and dislike of government.
As a self-labeled “conservative” I know how defensive you can be of government. Because that is a sentence that makes sense.
She's a woman with a job, and she probably wears pants sometimes. That makes her a communist in Farva's world.He has to be trolling. Nobody is that stupid.
He is a sexist pig too.She's a woman with a job, and she probably wears pants sometimes. That makes her a communist in Farva's world.
I tend to like ACB’s general disposition. And the Catholicism is always a huge plus. Looks great for a woman her age with so many kids.She's a woman with a job, and she probably wears pants sometimes. That makes her a communist in Farva's world.
I tend to like ACB’s general disposition. And the Catholicism is always a huge plus. Looks great for a woman her age with so many kids.
She would make a great wife and homemaker.
Not so. There are women in politics and law that are probably commendable, none really coming to mind at the moment but I’m sure there are.He is a sexist pig too.
none really coming to mind at the moment but I’m sure there are.
LOL.I will just have to get back to you on who exactly that is.
Let me riddle something at you Goat and you tell me if you agree.LOL.
I think I'd rather live in this messed up country than anywhere 100 years ago, and it's not even close.Let me riddle something at you Goat and you tell me if you agree.
A lot of people feel America is headed on the wrong trajectory. Regardless of political party in power, who you voted for etc. Maybe even a majority of people.
There is a fix in my opinion. Pretty much all functioning societies in human history practiced it up until the last century or so.
But I suppose we’re more “enlightened” and “know better”
I mean after all, we chop our boys dicks off and call them girls. We laugh in the face of historical precedent and what it may have been out in place for.
What are your thoughts?
Ah. I can’t disagree.I think I'd rather live in this messed up country than anywhere 100 years ago, and it's not even close.
You’re clearly immersed in the manosphere.Not so. There are women in politics and law that are probably commendable, none really coming to mind at the moment but I’m sure there are.
Margaret Thatcher maybe? Queen Elizabeth II?
The irony of British politics has always been that the women have more balls than the men.
But there is definitely an American woman in politics and/ or law that we should hold up as an example. I will just have to get back to you on who exactly that is.
I found some secret footage of that placeYou’re clearly immersed in the manosphere.
That’s a pretty fvcked up place.
I think they are attributable to continued development of a relatively liberal and mostly secular society that was given a huge boost at the beginning by some timely industrial developments. I don't think they have anything to do with women in politics and government, except to say that the same open society that allowed these advancements also necessarily leads to higher degrees of freedom an access to power for women.Ah. I can’t disagree.
We take for granted the geopolitical stability and creature comforts of our time. Technological advancement is a great thing. The respite in world wars has been a great thing.
Are those things attributable to women in politics and government however? I don’t believe you could make a compelling case for that.
It’s a good question.I think they are attributable to continued development of a relatively liberal and mostly secular society that was given a huge boost at the beginning by some timely industrial developments. I don't think they have anything to do with women in politics and government, except to say that the same open society that allowed these advancements also necessarily leads to higher degrees of freedom an access to power for women.
There are still plenty of societies on this planet right now which practice the type of restricted gender roles you're advocating. Do you aspire to be more like them?
So you think Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc., would be even more messed up if they gave political rights to women? Because I see no evidence in the world today or throughout history to support your "logic."It’s a good question.
I believe morally that political equality for women is the right thing.
Logically, I look at said equality and can’t come to any other conclusion than it being a detriment to society.
The answer likely lies somewhere in the middle. Married women with children should be allowed to vote for sure (even if that means more ACB’s).So you think Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc., would be even more messed up if they gave political rights to women? Because I see no evidence in the world today or throughout history to support your "logic."
Probably looking at that more women identify as liberal or independent compared to their male counterpart.So you think Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc., would be even more messed up if they gave political rights to women? Because I see no evidence in the world today or throughout history to support your "logic."
So only women that have gotten a penis vote of approval should get to vote? lmaoThe answer likely lies somewhere in the middle. Married women with children should be allowed to vote for sure (even if that means more ACB’s).
But the masses of unmarried, childless women are undoubtedly a detractor to Western politics.
Sorry, I just see no evidence whatsoever to back that up.The answer likely lies somewhere in the middle. Married women with children should be allowed to vote for sure (even if that means more ACB’s).
But the masses of unmarried, childless women are undoubtedly a detriment to Western politics.
One or two questions. Are you an Imam? Shia or Sunni?It’s a good question.
I believe morally that political equality for women is the right thing.
Logically, I look at said equality and can’t come to any other conclusion than it being a detriment to society.
I credit Ego Man with giving a lot of low self-esteem American men a voice. That’s a good thing in the long run.You're an ignoramus. Stupid as well. Your handle is as stupid as you are.
You're some sort of loosertarian MAGA combo and you're ignorant about most everything you have strong opinions about. Why do you think your opinions are post-worthy? Don't answer - you're stupid and aren't smart enough to realize how stupid you are.
Everything in your second paragraph is false. Nothing but a lie. I have no clue how or why you pulled "big pharma" out of your ass. I'm guessing it's because you're actually a clinical idiot.
ACB is a conservative and you are a fool.
Just STFU.
What left leaning opinion has ACB authored or joined? (Be careful this is a trick question).Instead of Garland, Obama should have nominated someone like ACB for example. Still a left leaning judge, but one you can steal some Republican votes for.
Muslim morality doesn’t believe in political equality for women. Why would you ask me that question?One or two questions. Are you an Imam? Shia or Sunni?
Muslim morality doesn’t believe in political equality for women. Why would you ask me that question?
Why, you ask: "Logically, I look at said equality and can’t come to any other conclusion than it being a detriment to society."It’s a good question.
I believe morally that political equality for women is the right thing.
I often have tension between my moral and logical beliefs.Why, you ask: "Logically, I look at said equality and can’t come to any other conclusion than it being a detriment to society."
I think girls beat him up a during K-12. He’s holding a grudge.Sorry, I just see no evidence whatsoever to back that up.