ADVERTISEMENT

MAGA turns on Barrett

Oh, they've been reminded alright. Posobiec and Loomer are all over her.
They are trying to do it with Dems today as well. NBC has posted the same article about Newsome saying Trans women shouldn't compete in sports against biological women every hour since he said it yesterday.

Us fighting gets clicks. Clicks are the only way they make money. All they care about it money.
 
I hope he gets another pick but dems control the senate and pull a spineless turtle on him.
Such an impasse will happen again. Assuredly.

And I’m not sure what the country will do when judges can’t get appointed.

In a perfect world, the President will appoint someone more palatable to the party that controls the senate.

Instead of Garland, Obama should have nominated someone like ACB for example. Still a left leaning judge, but one you can steal some Republican votes for.
 
Such an impasse will happen again. Assuredly.

And I’m not sure what the country will do when judges can’t get appointed.

In a perfect world, the President will appoint someone more palatable to the party that controls the senate.

Instead of Garland, Obama should have nominated someone like ACB for example. Still a left leaning judge, but one you can steal some Republican votes for.
Thinking ACB is a "left leaning judge" is pure ignorance.
 
That you think that ACB is a "left leaning judge" proves your ignorance.
But we see the world through different lenses my friend. I’m a hard partisan, Conservative. I make no bones about that. I’m not putting on airs to pretend to be some sort of diplomatic moderate.

You are a big government, big pharma self labeled “Conservative” who can’t actually name any government function they’re willing to see done away with.

You see why we differ on ACB. You are much more leftist than myself. Much more leftist than most Democrat’s I know to be honest.
 
But we see the world through different lenses my friend. I’m a hard partisan, Conservative. I make no bones about that. I’m not putting on airs to pretend to be some sort of diplomatic moderate.

You are a big government, big pharma self labeled “Conservative” who can’t actually name any government function they’re willing to see done away with.

You see why we differ on ACB. You are much more leftist than myself. Much more leftist than most Democrat’s I know to be honest.
You're an ignoramus. Stupid as well. Your handle is as stupid as you are.

You're some sort of loosertarian MAGA combo and you're ignorant about most everything you have strong opinions about. Why do you think your opinions are post-worthy? Don't answer - you're stupid and aren't smart enough to realize how stupid you are.

Everything in your second paragraph is false. Nothing but a lie. I have no clue how or why you pulled "big pharma" out of your ass. I'm guessing it's because you're actually a clinical idiot.

ACB is a conservative and you are a fool.

Just STFU.
 
Last edited:
Such an impasse will happen again. Assuredly.

And I’m not sure what the country will do when judges can’t get appointed.

In a perfect world, the President will appoint someone more palatable to the party that controls the senate.

Instead of Garland, Obama should have nominated someone like ACB for example. Still a left leaning judge, but one you can steal some Republican votes for.
There was no issue with Garland's resume and spineless turtle didn't even say there was (wouldn't even let it come up for debate).
 
You're an ignoramus. Stupid as well. Your handle is as stupid as you are.

You're some sort of loosertarian MAGA combo and your ignorant about most everything you have strong opinions about. Why do you think your opinions are post-worthy? Don't answer - you're stupid and aren't smart enough to realize how stupid you are.

Everything in your second paragraph is false. Nothing but a lie. I have no clue how or why you pulled "big pharma" out of your ass. I'm guessing it's because you're actually a clinical idiot.

ACB is a conservative and you are a fool.

Just STFU.
I certainly have some libertarian leanings, you got that right.

You’ll have to forgive my intense distrust and dislike of government.

As a self-labeled “conservative” I know how defensive you can be of government. Because that is a sentence that makes sense.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
I hope, pray that Trump gets another shot at an appointment.

Can anyone say Mike Lee? Ted Cruz?
Celebration Cannon GIF by Columbus Blue Jackets
 
I certainly have some libertarian leanings, you got that right.

You’ll have to forgive my intense distrust and dislike of government.

As a self-labeled “conservative” I know how defensive you can be of government. Because that is a sentence that makes sense.
Your last sentence doesn't say what you think it says.
 
He is a sexist pig too.
Not so. There are women in politics and law that are probably commendable, none really coming to mind at the moment but I’m sure there are.

Margaret Thatcher maybe? Queen Elizabeth II?

The irony of British politics has always been that the women have more balls than the men.

But there is definitely an American woman in politics and/ or law that we should hold up as an example. I will just have to get back to you on who exactly that is.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
Let me riddle something at you Goat and you tell me if you agree.

A lot of people feel America is headed on the wrong trajectory. Regardless of political party in power, who you voted for etc. Maybe even a majority of people.

There is a fix in my opinion. Pretty much all functioning societies in human history practiced it up until the last century or so.

But I suppose we’re more “enlightened” and “know better”

I mean after all, we chop our boys dicks off and call them girls. We laugh in the face of historical precedent and what it may have been put in place for.

What are your thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Let me riddle something at you Goat and you tell me if you agree.

A lot of people feel America is headed on the wrong trajectory. Regardless of political party in power, who you voted for etc. Maybe even a majority of people.

There is a fix in my opinion. Pretty much all functioning societies in human history practiced it up until the last century or so.

But I suppose we’re more “enlightened” and “know better”

I mean after all, we chop our boys dicks off and call them girls. We laugh in the face of historical precedent and what it may have been out in place for.

What are your thoughts?
I think I'd rather live in this messed up country than anywhere 100 years ago, and it's not even close.
 
I think I'd rather live in this messed up country than anywhere 100 years ago, and it's not even close.
Ah. I can’t disagree.

We take for granted the geopolitical stability and creature comforts of our time. Technological advancement is a great thing. The respite in world wars has been a great thing.

Are those things attributable to women in politics and government however? I don’t believe you could make a compelling case for that.
 
Not so. There are women in politics and law that are probably commendable, none really coming to mind at the moment but I’m sure there are.

Margaret Thatcher maybe? Queen Elizabeth II?

The irony of British politics has always been that the women have more balls than the men.

But there is definitely an American woman in politics and/ or law that we should hold up as an example. I will just have to get back to you on who exactly that is.
You’re clearly immersed in the manosphere.
That’s a pretty fvcked up place.
 
Ah. I can’t disagree.

We take for granted the geopolitical stability and creature comforts of our time. Technological advancement is a great thing. The respite in world wars has been a great thing.

Are those things attributable to women in politics and government however? I don’t believe you could make a compelling case for that.
I think they are attributable to continued development of a relatively liberal and mostly secular society that was given a huge boost at the beginning by some timely industrial developments. I don't think they have anything to do with women in politics and government, except to say that the same open society that allowed these advancements also necessarily leads to higher degrees of freedom an access to power for women.

There are still plenty of societies on this planet right now which practice the type of restricted gender roles you're advocating. Do you aspire to be more like them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
I think they are attributable to continued development of a relatively liberal and mostly secular society that was given a huge boost at the beginning by some timely industrial developments. I don't think they have anything to do with women in politics and government, except to say that the same open society that allowed these advancements also necessarily leads to higher degrees of freedom an access to power for women.

There are still plenty of societies on this planet right now which practice the type of restricted gender roles you're advocating. Do you aspire to be more like them?
It’s a good question.

I believe morally that political equality for women is the right thing.

Logically, I look at said equality and can’t come to any other conclusion than it being a detriment to society.
 
It’s a good question.

I believe morally that political equality for women is the right thing.

Logically, I look at said equality and can’t come to any other conclusion than it being a detriment to society.
So you think Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc., would be even more messed up if they gave political rights to women? Because I see no evidence in the world today or throughout history to support your "logic."
 
So you think Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc., would be even more messed up if they gave political rights to women? Because I see no evidence in the world today or throughout history to support your "logic."
The answer likely lies somewhere in the middle. Married women with children should be allowed to vote for sure (even if that means more ACB’s).

But the masses of unmarried, childless women are undoubtedly a detriment to Western politics.
 
You're an ignoramus. Stupid as well. Your handle is as stupid as you are.

You're some sort of loosertarian MAGA combo and you're ignorant about most everything you have strong opinions about. Why do you think your opinions are post-worthy? Don't answer - you're stupid and aren't smart enough to realize how stupid you are.

Everything in your second paragraph is false. Nothing but a lie. I have no clue how or why you pulled "big pharma" out of your ass. I'm guessing it's because you're actually a clinical idiot.

ACB is a conservative and you are a fool.

Just STFU.
I credit Ego Man with giving a lot of low self-esteem American men a voice. That’s a good thing in the long run.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT