ADVERTISEMENT

Looks like the Supreme Court has another case headed their way...

Marvin the Martian said:
There is little doubt that nationwide injunctions have been TOO easy. However, the solution would be to establish conditions that must be met. Making it virtually impossible comes with its own set of issues.
Click to expand...
Something to think about. I believe there is a carve out for class action lawsuits in this decision. So if a bunch of anchor babies are able to form a class action lawsuit they could get a nationwide injunction.

In that scenario, even if the lawsuit is successful, makes its way up to SCOTUS who affirms birthright citizenship. We now have a list of children of illegal immigrants. That could be given straight to Homan to go to work deporting the parents. Maybe a lot of them would want to take their kids with them. Pretty cool.
 
GooglyMooglyWooglyBoogly said:
Something to think about. I believe there is a carve out for class action lawsuits in this decision. So if a bunch of anchor babies are able to form a class action lawsuit they could get a nationwide injunction.

In that scenario, even if the lawsuit is successful, makes its way up to SCOTUS who affirms birthright citizenship. We now have a list of children of illegal immigrants. That could be given straight to Homan to go to work deporting the parents. Maybe a lot of them would want to take their kids with them. Pretty cool.
Click to expand...

Aren't class actions for civil suits? What damages would they seek?
 
Aloha Hoosier said:
Classic DANC. A whatabout comparing two entirely different issues with completely different requirements and processes.
Click to expand...
Priceless. Can never recognize a double standard when his hypocrisy is exposed.

Creating EOs and spending taxpayer money is perfectly fine on his word - no documented process required.

Declassifying outdated documents on his word? Nooooo..... got to have a documented process for that.

You are nothing if not predictable.
 
GooglyMooglyWooglyBoogly said:
Something to think about. I believe there is a carve out for class action lawsuits in this decision. So if a bunch of anchor babies are able to form a class action lawsuit they could get a nationwide injunction.

In that scenario, even if the lawsuit is successful, makes its way up to SCOTUS who affirms birthright citizenship. We now have a list of children of illegal immigrants. That could be given straight to Homan to go to work deporting the parents. Maybe a lot of them would want to take their kids with them. Pretty cool.
Click to expand...
No, that's not how it works.
 
DANC said:
Priceless. Can never recognize a double standard when his hypocrisy is exposed.

Creating EOs and spending taxpayer money is perfectly fine on his word - no documented process required.

Declassifying outdated documents on his word? Nooooo..... got to have a documented process for that.

You are nothing if not predictable.
Click to expand...
You still have all the facts wrong. You proved long ago that you have no idea how classification and declassification process works, but chug along in blissful ignorance.

Your whatabout was irrelevant to the subject, which is classic DANC.
 
DANC said:
Priceless. Can never recognize a double standard when his hypocrisy is exposed.

Creating EOs and spending taxpayer money is perfectly fine on his word - no documented process required.

Declassifying outdated documents on his word? Nooooo..... got to have a documented process for that.

You are nothing if not predictable.
Click to expand...
@DANC and @dbmhoosier playing badminton.
@Aloha Hoosier is the Shuttlecock.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: DANC, Hoopsdoc1978 and GooglyMooglyWooglyBoogly
Joe_Hoopsier said:
@DANC and @dbmhoosier playing badminton.
@Aloha Hoosier is the Shuttlecock.
Click to expand...
In fairness to aloha that is not a spot you want to be in. Dbm with sourced info before the networks even hear rumors. And DANC. Wow. It’s worth remembering how he even got here. He was just a poster on the football board who occasionally would correct the record when posters over there made political posts that were off. Then a certain jerk over there who was jealous of his dominance made the mistake of thinking DANC wouldn’t do the same thing on this board and dared him to come over. Well. As we all know he started collecting scalps on day one.

As a long time listener on this board I could sense that history was about to be made. That he was going to start a movement to flip the script on this liberal echo chamber.

And the rest is just a Dream
 
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier and DANC
Aloha Hoosier said:
You still have all the facts wrong. You proved long ago that you have no idea how classification and declassification process works, but chug along in blissful ignorance.

Your whatabout was irrelevant to the subject, which is classic DANC.
Click to expand...
Simple question: What branch of government determines document classifcation?

Next simple question: Who is head of that branch of government?

I know you won't answer - it will make you look ridiculous.
 
DANC said:
Simple question: What branch of government determines document classifcation?

Next simple question: Who is head of that branch of government?

I know you won't answer - it will make you look ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Executive branch. President. Stupid questions. You still know absolutely nothing about classification / declassification procedures and requirements. You’re willfully ignorant and hopeless.

Your whatabout remains irrelevant and flat out moronic. Classic DANC.
 
Aloha Hoosier said:
Executive branch. President. Stupid questions. You still know absolutely nothing about classification / declassification procedures and requirements. You’re willfully ignorant and hopeless.

Your whatabout remains irrelevant and flat out moronic. Classic DANC.
Click to expand...
Congratulations! You get a cookie!

That's right - the President determines what is classified and what's not. I know enough to know whatever the President determines about classification is the last word.

Your ignorance come from thinking the President is bound by the same rules you are, or were. Your limiited view of the world doesn't allow you to see he's the ultimate decider.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Bulk VanderHuge
DANC said:
Congratulations! You get a cookie!

That's right - the President determines what is classified and what's not. I know enough to know whatever the President determines about classification is the last word.

Your ignorance come from thinking the President is bound by the same rules you are, or were. Your limiited view of the world doesn't allow you to see he's the ultimate decider.
Click to expand...
He did not declassify them when President and former Presidents can’t. They stopped floating that easily disproven defense. Guess you didn’t get the memo. So ignorant. So hopeless. Hey, he’s President now and will never be prosecuted and convicted now. He’s the best example of above law forever more. Congrats,
 
Aloha Hoosier said:
He did not declassify them when President and former Presidents can’t. They stopped floating that easily disproven defense. Guess you didn’t get the memo. So ignorant. So hopeless. Hey, he’s President now and will never be prosecuted and convicted now. He’s the best example of above law forever more. Congrats,
Click to expand...
When did I say he declassified them? I merely pointed out your double standard for Trump vs every other President. You expect documentation for him, but let Biden slide when it comes to autopen authorization - saying his verbal OK is enough.

Stop moving the goal posts, although I understand why you do.
 
DANC said:
When did I say he declassified them? I merely pointed out your double standard for Trump vs every other President. You expect documentation for him, but let Biden slide when it comes to autopen authorization - saying his verbal OK is enough.

Stop moving the goal posts, although I understand why you do.
Click to expand...
The two issues are 100 percent unrelated. There is one standard for every President on each separate issue. There is no double standard at all. You aren’t actually stupid like other posters here, but this is a very stupid argument by you. You should stop while you’re behind because it’s impossible for you to ever catch up.
 
jet812 said:
See Justice Barrett’s opinion…
Click to expand...
So technically, KBJ doesn't call the text legalese: she's referring to the issue Justice Barrett identifies as the main one, and that issue is an originalist one. Her dissent also doesn't focus on a textual analysis because she joins Sotomayor's dissent, which already did that.

KBJ's opinion is about as hyperbolic as it gets. The most hysterical on the left will cite and rely it upon on it, including, no doubt, some people here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
BradStevens said:
So technically, KBJ doesn't call the text legalese: she's referring to the issue Justice Barrett identifies as the main one, and that issue is an originalist one. Her dissent also doesn't focus on a textual analysis because she joins Sotomayor's dissent, which already did that.

KBJ's opinion is about as hyperbolic as it gets. The most hysterical on the left will cite and rely it upon on it, including, no doubt, some people here.
Click to expand...
I always find it fascinating when there's so much to legitimately criticize about something, how the MAGA crowd still feels the need to attack a straw man anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BradStevens and Aloha Hoosier
You must log in or register to reply here.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back