Locked On UCLA Reaction
- Thread starter Big Red Crimson Buffalo
- Start date
I thought UCLA had some talent … but weren’t as well organized …
and were out executed on both sides of the ball.
UCLA QB wasn’t up to the task to beat Bryant’s defense.
Rourke beat the UCLA secondary going 9 for 9 on 3rd down drop backs.
Maybe the name Indiana is the embarrassment… the better team clearly won.
and were out executed on both sides of the ball.
UCLA QB wasn’t up to the task to beat Bryant’s defense.
Rourke beat the UCLA secondary going 9 for 9 on 3rd down drop backs.
Maybe the name Indiana is the embarrassment… the better team clearly won.
I liked UCLA’s running back. Slippery, gave good effort, got yardage after contact.
I think Foster seems like a good dude and he’s UCLA to the bone, but I don’t think he was ready for this gig. I had this game circled as a W since the schedule came out, and really got into believing it after his B1G media days fiasco. If you aren’t able to prepare for that, you aren’t able to prepare for a game.
I think Foster seems like a good dude and he’s UCLA to the bone, but I don’t think he was ready for this gig. I had this game circled as a W since the schedule came out, and really got into believing it after his B1G media days fiasco. If you aren’t able to prepare for that, you aren’t able to prepare for a game.
It is nice to have the shoe on the other foot for a change as IU dominated UCLA.
Similar threads
