So the jury is deadlocked on three counts. No indication of the other eight counts. What would that suggest? It would seem to me that if they agreed on not guilty for the other 8 then there wouldn't be much reason the be hung on three other counts. There are three counts here relating to the defrauding of actual patients. Maybe those? Seems like that might be tougher to prove.
Seems to me as if she's quite a charlatan. But I'm no lawyer. Cute though.
Seems to me as if she's quite a charlatan. But I'm no lawyer. Cute though.