I believe there have been 50 or so incidents since the leaked opinion came out....no arrests. One such terrorist group gave 30 days notice of intent to anti-abortion groups, then the gloves are off. I wonder how the FBI is doing in infiltrating the group???
Joe--Here are some domestic terrorists to get after
- Thread starter mushroomgod_1
- Start date
Jane’s Revenge.
Sounds like such a pleasant group of young (and old, I suppose) ladies. Watch out when the Supreme Court releases the “Roe decision.”
So sorry ladies don’t feel the need to be pleasant about their rights being taken away. I know we should just smile more.
Wow......they sound almost as dangerous as angry parents at a school board meeting!! Maybe the DOJ should call Jane and ask if they would be ok with DOJ investigating them? If it wouldn't cause too much inconvenience.
Minnesota pregnancy center vandalized by 'Jane's Revenge': 'We should’ve done more'
A pregnancy center in Minneapolis was vandalized on Tuesday and the group Jane's Revenge claimed responsibility for the attack, adding that “We should’ve done more.”
The bigots in Arkansas refused to accept the Brown v. Board of Education decision.
Ike called out the 101st Airborne.
Imagine the liberals acting like Klan.
”Birds of a feather.”
Due process is the equalizer.
Equal opportunity is the path.
Equal result is an abuse of power.
I hope they criticize but uphold Roe, as a peaceful nod to stare decisis.
If you want less elective abortions, change hearts, not laws.
But I hope every anarchist is murdered in their own camp bed by a fellow anarchist.
Give em what they want.
I don't think many of you have to worry about getting knocked up.
What constitutional rights would be taken away? Please cite the specific part of the constitution if you respond. Thanks
Where did anyone mention constitutional rights? For the record, it was law decided by the Supreme Court, or that’s what the new judges said when they lied in order to get passed.
Yeah, right, that’s what Jane’s Revenge is talking about.
Oh wait until the 2nd amendment folks start sharing that philosophy .
I don't see any smelly white man oppression here, so why are all the smelly white men offended? Do you guys look for things to be offended about?
What a stupid lifestyle to lead.
What a stupid lifestyle to lead.
What right? 95%+ of abortions are because the "impregnatable person" (aka a woman) chose to take that risk for the reward of enjoyment.
Last edited:
i understand your concern about your rights being taken away. However, I am more concerned about the rights of the babies to live that is being taken from them.
You mean having your head up your ass like you? That is where all the smell is coming from. What did you have for lunch?
I obviously disagree with firebombing. I was merely responding to Univee comment that they seemed to be a pleasant bunch of ladies.
Why do the men take that risk? Aren’t they just as responsible?? Why doesn’t the impregnating person do something about it?
That is exactly why I asked you, I wanted to know what your ignorant answer would be. Ah yes, the world according to Zeke, a liberal utopia of right and wrong as only she sees it and nothing else matters. How do you decide which lives are OK to take and which aren't in your little world?
So you think violence is OK when a SC decision doesn't go your way?
Sounds like sedition to me. Treason. That's the standard for violence against the government now, right?
Because men don't have to carry a child for 9 months. Is that fair? No. But life isn't fair.
And the guy should take responsibility and use protection. But why would any woman leave that responsibility to the man? That is insane!
My kid had a nut allergy when he was young. We didn't leave it up to someone else to make sure he didn't eat nuts. Or hope someone else brought an epi-pen. We took it upon ourselves to prevent an episode from happening to avoid long term consequences.
U.S. Abortion Statistics
Facts and figures relating to the frequency of abortion in the United States.
abort73.com
Big at putting words in my mouth tonight, aren’t you? Look up sedition tonight. Maybe you’ll learn something.
That has nothing to do with what you said.U.S. Abortion Statistics
Facts and figures relating to the frequency of abortion in the United States.abort73.com
I think the Supreme Court should rule that all males should have vasectomies at age 12. Cool? They can always be reversed when a woman agrees to be impregnated.
| Percentage | Reason |
|---|---|
| <0.5% | Victim of rape |
| 3% | Fetal health problems |
| 4% | Physical health problems |
| 4% | Would interfere with education or career |
| 7% | Not mature enough to raise a child |
| 8% | Don't want to be a single mother |
| 19% | Done having children |
| 23% | Can't afford a baby |
| 25% | Not ready for a child |
| 6% | Other |
I guess if it comes before the SC, then I suppose they can look at the Constitutionality of it.
I can read. That’s not what you said. You said risk for reward of enjoyment. I see multiple reasons here. Who are you to decide what is valid and what is not?
Play unprotected games, win unprotected prizes.
There's a simple solution to this puzzle.
Ignorance personified again.
So what reason would these women have for becoming impregnated again? We are throwing out rape so if not for pleasure just what would be the point? If you are right stupidity would be the next reason is that what you are trying to say?
Talk about being triggered. You sure seem to think it is for you to decide about everything.
Let me spell it out. 95%+ of abortions are elective, not from rape, incest, or health of the mother. Of those 95%+, every single woman had the CHOICE to have sex or not to have sex. They CHOSE to have sex for the enjoyment and pleasure of sex in spite of the risk of getting pregnant.
They KNEW it was not a good time for a child, could not afford a baby, a baby would interfere with education or career, done with having children, didn't want to be a single mother, not mature enough to have a child, but still CHOSE to have sex anyway. Now why would a woman do that knowing she, unfairly, will have to carry the burden of pregnancy for 9 months? Why would she lay that risk with her body at the feet of a man?
Last edited:
Maybe you should sit this one out. Liberalism is a mental illness.
