I've watched this guy's videos for a while. They are a cure for insomnia. Seriously.
Ivermectin: wonder drug.
- Thread starter HillzHoozier
- Start date
Would seem you would have saved yourself a lot of grief in your OP... if you would have just linked the damn study. Since Campbell always puts the links right in the reference notes of his YouTube posts, it's not exactly hard. Same could be said for all those complaining about not having the link, I guess.
RETRACTED: Treatment with Ivermectin Is Associated with Decreased Mortality in COVID-19 Patients: Analysis of a National Federated Database
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdr…
This! ^^^ my grandpa’s childhood doctor preached white vinegar over the polio vaccine and today he’s the happiest wheelchair-bound freedom lover EVAR!
Because scientists keep doing peer review studies. I guess they make money to do them. Surely a greedy dude like you understands that.
Why do you deny science when you don't like the result?
Better question - why does one science study say ivermectin is effective at something (here, apparently preventing death from Covid) and other science study says something different?
Does the vaccine stop spread this week? Have your propagandists told you what to say yet?
His feigned professorial speech habit is definitely soporific, especially the way he drags it out.
I doubt there will ever be large scale studies done regarding a generic drug. No cost/benefit to such a thing.
Huh? I said I've watched many of them. I mean he puts out a "talk" out on a daily basis. I actually find some of them interesting... or at a minimum sleep inducing. That's not really a negative for me.
No. Do your own homework. They were provided every time anybody linked this guy. HE links the studies, which you would know if you looked at his videos for even seconds. But you don't. You just criticize what you dont even read or review. You are nothing but a propaganda receptacle. Your uninformed opinions are worthless, except for the comedy of watching a mental jester.
I prefer that you continue to spew uniformed idiocy as always, proven by the fact you didn't look at the videos and see the clearly provided studies. And PS - when he reviews non-peer reviewed studies, he says so, and discounts the data accordingly. But you wouldn't know that either. What you don't know is a body of info that grows every day.
“The man who will not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.”
You are a politically-propagandized hack. You deny science. You ignore info you don't like. Your posts are the proof.
Do vaccines stop the spread this week? Link? Studies? Spew.
Why? You going to read them? Of course you won't. Last August in another thread, I linked something like 163 studies, with 75 being peer reviewed and even some double blind. I linked to you specifically several studies and an article from the creator of Ivermectin regarding its covid potential, and you dismissed it all.
The Ivermectin Train Cannot Stop
It started with a laboratory study on African green monkey kidney cells. While the dose used was much higher than what doctors would prescribe, the results were promising. Ivermectin could stop the new coronavirus from making copies of itself. This drug, ivermectin, has acquired political...
www.mcgill.ca
Political affiliation may have swayed prescribing of ineffective COVID drugs
Two treatments that have been shown to be ineffective against COVID-19—hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin—were more heavily prescribed in U.S. counties with a higher Republican vote share in the 202…
Covid-19 — Myth Versus Fact
To help you better understand what’s happening and cut through the confusion, here are some common myths.
Debunking COVID-19 myths
Some information you come across about COVID-19 may be out of date or false. Learn about COVID-19 myths so you can bust them when you see them.
www.mayoclinic.org
Fringe Doctors' Groups Promote Ivermectin for COVID despite a Lack of Evidence
The organizations touting unproved protocols for the antiparasitic drug may be harming vaccination efforts
Ivermectin for COVID-19: Safety and Alternatives
The medication ivermectin continues to be viewed by some as a treatment for COVID-19. Learn why that’s a concern, particularly when it comes to versions of ivermectin formulated for animals.
health.clevelandclinic.org
Ivermectin Doesn’t Help Covid Patients, Study Finds
Ivermectin, lauded by some as a Covid-19 miracle cure, does nothing to prevent patients with the virus from developing more severe symptoms, a study published Friday found.
www.forbes.com
People like you are the problem.
He's smarter than all of us on this board - if you're measuring by YouTube hits. He's got you and others watching every one of his vids. Dude is printing far more than he made nursing or as a PhD of Nursing.
Stop acting like you read anything but the titles.The Ivermectin Train Cannot Stop
It started with a laboratory study on African green monkey kidney cells. While the dose used was much higher than what doctors would prescribe, the results were promising. Ivermectin could stop the new coronavirus from making copies of itself. This drug, ivermectin, has acquired political...www.mcgill.ca
Political affiliation may have swayed prescribing of ineffective COVID drugs
Two treatments that have been shown to be ineffective against COVID-19—hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin—were more heavily prescribed in U.S. counties with a higher Republican vote share in the 202…www.hsph.harvard.edu
Covid-19 — Myth Versus Fact
To help you better understand what’s happening and cut through the confusion, here are some common myths.www.hopkinsmedicine.org
Debunking COVID-19 myths
Some information you come across about COVID-19 may be out of date or false. Learn about COVID-19 myths so you can bust them when you see them.
Fringe Doctors' Groups Promote Ivermectin for COVID despite a Lack of Evidence
The organizations touting unproved protocols for the antiparasitic drug may be harming vaccination effortswww.scientificamerican.com
Ivermectin for COVID-19: Safety and Alternatives
The medication ivermectin continues to be viewed by some as a treatment for COVID-19. Learn why that’s a concern, particularly when it comes to versions of ivermectin formulated for animals.
Ivermectin Doesn’t Help Covid Patients, Study Finds
Ivermectin, lauded by some as a Covid-19 miracle cure, does nothing to prevent patients with the virus from developing more severe symptoms, a study published Friday found.
People like you are the problem.
You criticize what you have not read.
The British guy provides links to every study he reviews. And unlike you, he reads them before he discusses them. And unlike you, he doesn’t just read the titles.
You are a clown. You proved it again in this thread, by shooting off your mouth in a way that proved what you did, and did NOT do.
Go away and don’t read some other stuff. Then pretend to tell others what you didn’t read meant and said.
Try a kindergarten. They’ll buy your uninformed BS and give you a cookie too.
You lied. People died. Does the vaccine stop the spread this week? Link us a study title.
You need to read more. YouTube ad review is next to nothing these days. YouTube keeps it. Plus, he’s been in the public health policy gig for almost 2 decades, working mostly with third world countries, using videos as teaching tools to improve health care in such places.
I don’t watch all his stuff, but the ones I have watched are well done, unless you need your info in CNN sound-bites. He surveys data and studies from across the globe, doesn’t give a shit about Donald Trump or American politics (which is why fools like The Clown don’t like him - their science is based on politics), and just gives you the raw info, including studies, even when he disagrees with them.
American political sycophant propaganda receptacles like The Clowh don’t like him because he won’t accept political BS instead of the data.
Based on the DATA, he was months ahead of the CDC about Covid being airborne, about Vitamin D, about the sources/strains of the variants, and especially about Omicron. The Clown and other clowns don’t like him for one reason - he reviewed studies that were BOTH for and against the treatments that Trump liked, and Trump trumps science for American political sycophant propaganda receptacles like The Clown. So they reject a guy who says “here is a study that says yes and a study that says no and a study that say inconclusive and another yes, etc.” They prefer selective science that they don’t read.
Wut?
Ryan Kaji, 9, earns $29.5m as this year's highest-paid YouTuber
Ryan’s World ‘child influencer’ also made estimated $200m from branded toys and clothing
You missed his nuance. He didn’t say link in his links. He said link his peer-reviewed studies.
Carry on... (popcorn)
The peer reviewed studies, and the non-peer reviewed studies, and the raw data, discussed by the guy are all - always - linked in his comments below his video. Only a clown who wants to act like he knows stuff he never reviewed could possible miss them. Thus, The Clown - the single most intellectually-dishonest poster on this board - missed them.
What?Wut?
Ryan Kaji, 9, earns $29.5m as this year's highest-paid YouTuber
Ryan’s World ‘child influencer’ also made estimated $200m from branded toys and clothingwww.theguardian.com
How much money YouTubers make and can earn, according to creators
YouTubers explain how much they make per month, their RPM rates, and what they made on videos with 100,000 and 1 million views. You can monetize your videos for success.
www.businessinsider.com
Your link is not the norm. (Probably isn’t a peer-reviewed anti-Trump Clown Show either.)
PS - just because YOU buy Kardashian videos doesn’t mean a medical guy can make the big bucks. But if the guy made some money during Covid by putting out data instead of Trump/anti-Trump Americanized propaganda created for fools like The Clown, good for him. I doubt if his teaching videos to Africans made him much, and the Covid train is about over. And if the CDC was doing it’s job, this guy would have no US audience. But the Trump/anti-Trump debate forced thinkers to other sources. I wish I could get him to cover RA-based immunodeficiencies because in this country the answer is “we don’t know/cant say/sign the waiver/pay and leave.”
The government funded multiple (>10) very large scale clinical trials of ivermectin. It was central to some of the very first COVID funding bills. They also funded a variety of other long-shot ideas such as different vitamin cocktails. There is no argument to be made that it wasn't studied in controlled settings.
Because there are many different types of studies that can be done and they all have different relevance to treating human disease.
1) Does a compound impede infection of a COVID-like virus (not SAR-COV2 itself, but a benign analog that is safer to work with in a lab), in a biochemical assay (test tube).
2) Does it work when we go to one of those Biohazard Safety level 4 labs where people put on the space suits and work with real patient-derived virus, in a biochemical assay (test tube).
3) Does it work in an animal experiement with rodents in one one of those BSL4 labs?
4) Does it show some statistical benefit in humans when added to standard of care, off-label at doctor's discretion, without blinding, patient selection protocols, or large patient populations to minimize confounding variables and to give meaningful statistics?
5) Does it show some statistical benefit in humans in controlled, double-blinded FDA-approved clinical trials, with selection protocols and large patient populations to minimize confounding variables and to give meaningful statistics?
Studies of types 1, 2, 3, and 4 are falsely taken to mean "IT WORKS" and that confuses many people, not just you.
Studies of type 5 are the gold standard. If it works, show me results in studies of type 5. Many have been done. Some have been reported. None of them show a statistical benefit for ivermectin. Full stop. NONE.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
A phD who had to count the zeros on a p value? Who doesn’t know the difference between less & fewer? Who goes through great pains to continually say how significant a study is without acknowledging the shortcomings in it that even the authors do (e.g., non double blind or placebo controlled study) and not to mention that the people writing the Brazil study are in the advocacy business.
MTIOTF took issue with my saying he "touted" the study. But imho what he says in the vid description amounts to trying to "sell" this study. Esp when the NIH was pretty explicit about the study making claims that the official statistics did not confirm...
For example this table comparing covid cases in cities that did and did not make ivermectin distributions...
Comparison of number of COVID-19 cases in Brazilian cities with and without Ivermectin distribution campaigns. The bolded represent cities where mass distributions of ivermectin occurred in June 2020. Not only did the amount of covid cases decrease all 3 cities where Ivermectin was NOT distributed, but it increased in Itajai and the 2 other cities where the mass ivermectin distribution occurred. In fact, at the beginning of 2021, Itajai and Macapa had two of the highest fatality rates among all Brazilian cities...
| June | July | August | Change from June to August (%) | |
| Itajaí | 1385 (2123) | 1891 (2854) | 2733 (998) | 97% (−53%) |
| Chapecó | 1583 (1760) | 1337 (1754) | 1926 (1405) | 22% (−20%) |
| Macapá | 7960 (7966) | 2501 (2481) | 1742 (2370) | −78% (−70%) |
| Ananindeua | 1620 (1520) | 1523 (1521) | 991 (1014) | −39% (−30%) |
| Natal | 8695 (9009) | 7497 (7554) | 3304 (1590) | −62% (−82%) |
| João Pessoa | 9939 (9437) | 8032 (7963) | 5555 (5384) | −41% (−43%) |
And just so we're clear, the multiple debunking analysis of this study are not directed at the "Brit Guy". I found at least 4 that date back to at least Dec 2021, and he's posting a video in March 2022 that completely ignores the fact that multiple people have previously documented the issues with this study...
Ivermectin study in the city of Itajaí contains several methodological weaknesses, resulting in questionable conclusions
Ivermectin is a drug used to treat parasitic infections in humans and animals. Although some studies conducted on cells growing in the lab suggest that ivermectin has antiviral properties, reliable and large-scale clinical trials in humans haven’t detected significant benefits from ivermectin...
Last edited:
I wonder why this video got removed? These vids are Campbell's bread and butter, so something caused him to remove it...
Could it be this (one sided) twitter exchange between the author of the paper and Jordan Peterson, who basically tweeted about the study Campbell was discussing in the (now-deleted) OP video?
So here's Petersons tweet from March 7...
And here are replies from the author Lakov Efimenko, beginning the next day (March 8)... This mention of misinterpretation is probably more than Peterson can handle... And telling him it was NOT peer reviewed, and the reason it's only an abstract is because the evidence was to weak to submit it? Peterson likely had a heart attack...
Of course Peterson (and his minions) ignore what Lakov has to say, but this comment hits a little close, based on the OP...
Then Lakov a day later...a little more damning...
Another Campbell mention here...
Video tying it all together...
Just wanted to update everyone on this thread...
Explanation in video below. The video was removed because the abstract was withdrawn by its authors. Research ongoing in various places. Stay tuned!
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
Which will happen first, evidence of ivermectin working or the My pillow guy finding election fraud? On the edge of my seat.
A
anon_mya1phvcpf5x4
Guest
I don't. I follow the results, which say vaccines work better than any other option
That's great! Now what is your solution to those who are allergic to the vaccine?
How would anyone know ahead of time he is allergic to the Covid vaccine? And which one? Or all of them?
Have you been living under a rock? Many people are allergic to ingredients in the vaccines.
Interesting part of that link is that Covid used to have a separate category but now has been combined with influenza.
And I know someone with GBS. I guess they are just anti-vax Trumpers who deserve to die, right?
Last edited:
I remember when I was a kid trying to make some pancakes from a recipe. It said flip the pancake over a few seconds before the bubbles pop.
Lol. So funny, ****nuts! Imagine flipping the goddamm pancake and then your mom dies! Yeah, didn't think about that, did you, you POS! You think everyone can get the vax without consequence. And the whole ****ing world will be be rainbows and unicorns.
But you are oblivious to those people who are allergic to the ****ing vaccine and can die from anaphylaxis. But to you, **** them! It just a ****ing anti-vax, Trump loving joke. Well, **** you!!!
Triggered??? Yeah, I'm triggered, when some POS, numbnuts **** like you, makes a ****ing pancake joke when people have loved ones who have to choose between a vax that could kill them and living with a virus that could kill them. So just **** yourself and let us know how it feels to watch your mom choose the best way to live and not ****ing die!!!
Ok. Mine is not. Still, you still react like a POS.