If IU doesn’t cover this team at home then a new low has been reached by the IU program.Baylor beat them by 37 and they are probably 24 points better than us so sounds about right
I don't think it's possible to go any lower than the Louisville game. that was as embarrassing of a loss as I can remember. and it pretty much signaled to the non-believers than Woodson can't coach.If IU doesn’t cover this team at home then a new low has been reached by the IU program.
Okay but Louisville has an RPI of 33 and it was on a neutral court. Sam Houston has an RPI of 189 and at home.I don't think it's possible to go any lower than the Louisville game. that was as embarrassing of a loss as I can remember. and it pretty much signaled to the non-believers than Woodson can't coach.
Those shooters will be left wide open from three and will have career nights. I mean we have seen 3 defense the past 3 years and 7 games. It hasn't changed. If they can shoot the 3 ... game on ... and IU ends up in a close game. That should really help their NET rankings. 😂Okay but Louisville has an RPI of 33 and it was on a neutral court. Sam Houston has an RPI of 189 and at home.
They do have a couple guys that can shoot the 3 so hope they don’t go wild with our defense.
That said I just bet 1100 on it. 13.5 is stupidI don't think it's possible to go any lower than the Louisville game. that was as embarrassing of a loss as I can remember. and it pretty much signaled to the non-believers than Woodson can't coach.
Louisville had a cobbled together roster that was put together in about a month, a new coach. we returned 3 starters and 1 of the top portal classes and a coach in his 4th year. at one point we were down 40 getting dunked on by shaggy and getting laughed at. if we can go lower, I don't want to see itOkay but Louisville has an RPI of 33 and it was on a neutral court. Sam Houston has an RPI of 189 and at home.
They do have a couple guys that can shoot the 3 so hope they don’t go wild with our defense.
CavThat said I just bet 1100 on it. 13.5 is stupid
Better at home off the top of my head.Cav
I don’t follow the spreads but last year did we have a better cover percentage at home vs neutral and away or were they about the same?
That’s what I thought also. They tended to cover at home and nothing has changed with coaching so I would bet the same this season until proven differently.Better at home off the top of my head.
Stupid which way. I think I might take the 13.5That said I just bet 1100 on it. 13.5 is stupid
I took a quick look and think they were about 10-8 against the spread at home but this includes early season games when they were way overrated.Better at home off the top of my head.
Last year's preseason was pretty bad too. Squeaking by some awful teams. Not quite early Archie bad but bad.Louisville had a cobbled together roster that was put together in about a month, a new coach. we returned 3 starters and 1 of the top portal classes and a coach in his 4th year. at one point we were down 40 getting dunked on by shaggy and getting laughed at. if we can go lower, I don't want to see it
They are guard heavy and live behind the arch. Making 9-10 a game at around a 40% click. Our big's shouldn't have it hard, unless we get lazy on the boards'Alford's Nevada team beat them by 16. It was Nevada's first game of the year. 13.5 seems kinda low to me but I haven't read or looked at anything about Sam Houston State.
In years past this would be easy money…definitely the correct bet.That said I just bet 1100 on it. 13.5 is stupid
@ulrey HAHA throwing cash memeThat said I just bet 1100 on it. 13.5 is stupid