If you want an entertaining listen, check out this podcast by Galen Clavio of CrimsonCast. It's a pretty funny idea, but it is something that I've not heard anywhere else, and it is interesting discussion. I hope you'll watch and subscribe because he's one of the more thoughtful IU podcasters out there, and comes up with interesting takes like this. He says throw the sink at Matt Painter and see what he could do with IU's resources. I know many on here will say aim higher, but they've been the dominant program in the B10 for the last 10-15 years, makes the tournament every year and does have a NC game appearance and E8 in the last 5 years or so. Plus, as he says, if nothing else you throw 10 million at him, you force PU to pony up several more million per year, which is then money they can't put elsewhere. If he is at 4.5 million, I'd say he is vastly underpaid. So that's my question: would you be happy with Painter in Crimson, or do you truly want IU to "aim higher", and if so, who do you think that is? I'm not saying I want that to happen, but it's a fresh take in everything I'm hearing which is the same names recycled: