ADVERTISEMENT

I hope a bomb is dropped on the NRA convention.

Having a gun for protection is not about fear. It is about doing your part in protecting yourself, others, and property. Jesus did not speak about guns but he did say in Luke 22:35 And he said to them, i“When I sent you out with no moneybag or knapsack or sandals, did you lack anything?” They said, “Nothing.” 36 He said to them, “But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.
If you say that people don't need guns for protection then why do the police carry guns? The truth is this is a dangerous world. And it doesn't mean people are irrationally afraid. They just see how the world really is. There are evil and dangerous people out there and you want to protect yourself until the police arrive. That's about it. Again, it isn't about killing people because one is blood thirsty. It is about protection.
By definition, if you feel like you need something for protection it's because you're afraid of something potentially happening. Buying a gun is 100% about calculating how much fear you want to live with.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57
Having a gun for protection is not about fear. It is about doing your part in protecting yourself, others, and property. Jesus did not speak about guns but he did say in Luke 22:35 And he said to them, i“When I sent you out with no moneybag or knapsack or sandals, did you lack anything?” They said, “Nothing.” 36 He said to them, “But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.
If you say that people don't need guns for protection then why do the police carry guns? The truth is this is a dangerous world. And it doesn't mean people are irrationally afraid. They just see how the world really is. There are evil and dangerous people out there and you want to protect yourself until the police arrive. That's about it. Again, it isn't about killing people because one is blood thirsty. It is about protection.
The problem with that thinking is it feeds the arms race to keep up with the firepower we may have to face. Where does it stop, pastor?
 
By definition, if you feel like you need something for protection it's because you're afraid of something potentially happening. Buying a gun is 100% about calculating how much fear you want to live with.
Let me ask you this. Why do we have police at all? Isn't it because bad things happen and bad people happen? I actually would argue though I don't have a gun that having a gun brings more peace of mind. If you are confronted by those who have ill intention then at least you have a fighting chance.
 
I wonder how long a thread started by a pro lifer hoping for a bombing at a planned parenthood convention would last on this board?
This whole thread is pretty disgusting, though I think we can recognize hyperbole, even if poorly executed. Taking it literally, while I wouldn't attend an NRA meeting, I don't want the attendees killed. Some common sense inflicted on them? Sure. A bomb? No.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeorgeStrait IU
The problem with that thinking is it feeds the arms race to keep up with the firepower we may have to face. Where does it stop, pastor?
Are you talking about nation verses nation now? I would say this. The fact the U.S. has nuclear weapons has kept us safer because which country is going to come against us since we have them? It is a deterrent. Take a woman who is out alone at night and a man approaches her in the parking lot because he is either going to mug her or rape her. She turns around and has a revolver. Is that a deterrent? Will the man proceed or will he flee?
 
Of course if guns go away then bombs will be the next tool. Seems the democrats are fully supportive of bombs.

If Joe Biden has mental capacity left to remember how he loves wars, I'm sure he can't wait to get get the black market on guns ramped up to spend countless amounts of money on another war. The ATF killed plenty in Waco 30 so years so they likely can't wait get back at it. To bad someone didn't put Bedo or whatever that clowns name is 6 feet under. IMO, Americans are already at war with the Democratic party that needs removed from society. They only care about themselves and power and who they can blame next for something that goes wrong. Kerr alluded to it and Elon musk also alludes to it. Bedo couldn't wait to get film for a TV political commercial in the upcoming election.
Quite a rant. Too bad it’s almost impossible to read.
 
Effing ghouls.

So, I don't want to ever hear the following arguments ever again out of the GOP:

1. Only good guys w guns stop bad guys w guns - bullshit. Big tough Texas cops let that kid hang out in that school for 40 minutes.

2. Mental health - bullshit. A kid crashed his car, donned all in black carrying a rifle after shooting his grandma and still found time to make his way into a school, passed security somehow. Nobody thought the kid a bit odd in those few moments?

3. 18 year olds should be able to buy ARs but not rent cars - give me a break, dudes.

How the party of God has draped itself in this 2nd Amendment gobblygook is beyond me.

That NRA convention should be cancelled and I'd bet my retirement and house that God and Jesus agree with me.
Kids drove to school with guns in their vehicles in the 70s. What were the numbers of mass shootings then vs now?

This is a societal problem, not a gun problem.

Suggesting destroying an NRA convention is proof you have no concern about life and just want your demands met.
 
I wonder how long a thread started by a pro lifer hoping for a bombing at a planned parenthood convention would last on this board?
Come on. I would hazard a guess that the divide is pretty even here.
Don't act like this is some liberal coven. You're better than that.
 
Bomb-making is already illegal. Bombs are one of the types of arms excluded from 2nd amendment protection, as are nukes, cannons, missiles, hand grenades, land mines, etc. So it seems that assault weapons could be another excluded category. Yes, it would require soeme work to define exactly what is an assault weapon, but with lots of help from gun experts who agree that kids getting mowed down all the time is bad, I think it can be accomplished. It was accomplished in Australia, New Zealand, and pretty much everywhere else in the developed world.
Well, passing a law will definitely work. No more bombs are being made in the US!

Dumbass.
 
I don't own a gun, but the ones who do own them tell me it is all about protection. As I have read the rhetoric on this thread has anyone thought of this? It is not about shooting people like they are blood thirsty. It is about defending oneself from those who would cause harm. This tragic shooting in Texas was stopped by a man with a gun. So you have two men who have guns. One kills a bunch of kids and two teachers. He shot his own grandmother who was raising him. The second man went in alone and took him out. Who knows if he had not continued to kill other children?
my mother would call someone like you dense
 
This whole thread is pretty disgusting, though I think we can recognize hyperbole, even if poorly executed. Taking it literally, while I wouldn't attend an NRA meeting, I don't want the attendees killed. Some common sense inflicted on them? Sure. A bomb? No.
Oh, when one of your own is caught calling for violence, it's all hyperbole.

But you have NO problem blaming the NRA for mass shootings.

Dumbass.
 
Are you talking about nation verses nation now? I would say this. The fact the U.S. has nuclear weapons has kept us safer because which country is going to come against us since we have them? It is a deterrent. Take a woman who is out alone at night and a man approaches her in the parking lot because he is either going to mug her or rape her. She turns around and has a revolver. Is that a deterrent? Will the man proceed or will he flee?
I'm saying most of the people I know who are buying guns are getting assault rifles. Not sure it's just for personal protection, I've heard more than a few say they want to protect their "rights." When I say we're in an arms race, I mean now I have to think about whether I need my own assault weapon to protect my own rights?
 
Having a gun for protection is not about fear. It is about doing your part in protecting yourself, others, and property. Jesus did not speak about guns but he did say in Luke 22:35 And he said to them, i“When I sent you out with no moneybag or knapsack or sandals, did you lack anything?” They said, “Nothing.” 36 He said to them, “But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.
If you say that people don't need guns for protection then why do the police carry guns? The truth is this is a dangerous world. And it doesn't mean people are irrationally afraid. They just see how the world really is. There are evil and dangerous people out there and you want to protect yourself until the police arrive. That's about it. Again, it isn't about killing people because one is blood thirsty. It is about protection.
You can keep saying the same thing over and over and it still won’t matter.

Why do people seek out protection? Because they’re afraid of something and they’re trying to avoid it.

Be not afraid, Van. He goes before you always. A wop bop a loo bop a wop bam boom.
 
Kids drove to school with guns in their vehicles in the 70s. What were the numbers of mass shootings then vs now?

This is a societal problem, not a gun problem.

Suggesting destroying an NRA convention is proof you have no concern about life and just want your demands met.
From 1970 to 2020, the US population increased from about 203 million to 331 million.

In that same time period, the number of guns owned in this country increased from about 103 million to 398 million. So the population increased 60% and the number of guns increased 300%.

It can be both a societal problem and a gun problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: proper golfer
Having a gun for protection is not about fear. It is about doing your part in protecting yourself, others, and property. Jesus did not speak about guns but he did say in Luke 22:35 And he said to them, i“When I sent you out with no moneybag or knapsack or sandals, did you lack anything?” They said, “Nothing.” 36 He said to them, “But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.
If you say that people don't need guns for protection then why do the police carry guns? The truth is this is a dangerous world. And it doesn't mean people are irrationally afraid. They just see how the world really is. There are evil and dangerous people out there and you want to protect yourself until the police arrive. That's about it. Again, it isn't about killing people because one is blood thirsty. It is about protection.
Protecting property? You seriously think Jesus would have thought it acceptable to use a gun to protect your property?
 
Having a gun for protection is not about fear. It is about doing your part in protecting yourself, others, and property. Jesus did not speak about guns but he did say in Luke 22:35 And he said to them, i“When I sent you out with no moneybag or knapsack or sandals, did you lack anything?” They said, “Nothing.” 36 He said to them, “But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.
If you say that people don't need guns for protection then why do the police carry guns? The truth is this is a dangerous world. And it doesn't mean people are irrationally afraid. They just see how the world really is. There are evil and dangerous people out there and you want to protect yourself until the police arrive. That's about it. Again, it isn't about killing people because one is blood thirsty. It is about protection.
Oh, and your suggestion that the above passage from Luke 22 is about self-defense is absolute garbage.
 
You can keep saying the same thing over and over and it still won’t matter.

Why do people seek out protection? Because they’re afraid of something and they’re trying to avoid it.

Be not afraid, Van. He goes before you always. A wop bop a loo bop a wop bam boom.
As can you keep saying the same thing over and over and it won't make any difference. Do you wear a seatbelt? The only reason to is you are paranoid about being in an accident.
 
Having a gun for protection is not about fear. It is about doing your part in protecting yourself, others, and property. Jesus did not speak about guns but he did say in Luke 22:35 And he said to them, i“When I sent you out with no moneybag or knapsack or sandals, did you lack anything?” They said, “Nothing.” 36 He said to them, “But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.
If you say that people don't need guns for protection then why do the police carry guns? The truth is this is a dangerous world. And it doesn't mean people are irrationally afraid. They just see how the world really is. There are evil and dangerous people out there and you want to protect yourself until the police arrive. That's about it. Again, it isn't about killing people because one is blood thirsty. It is about protection.
First, I believe in an individual's right to have arms for self-defense.

Next, your reliance on Luke as support for that right is preposterous. The passage you cite was just before Jesus' arrest and crucifixion, and Jesus was talking about scripture being fulfilled by Jesus being "counted among the lawless."

Later in Luke, when one of his disciples cuts off, with a sword, a soldier's ear as Jesus is about to be arrested, Jesus says: "'No more of this!' And he touched his ear and healed him."

Jesus also emphatically rejected the "eye for an eye" philosophy and instead advocated for "turn[ing] the other cheek."

Go ahead and make your political arguments, but don't distort the New Testament and turn Jesus into a gun rights advocate. Good Lord!
 
By definition, if you feel like you need something for protection it's because you're afraid of something potentially happening. Buying a gun is 100% about calculating how much fear you want to live with.
You’ve been making this argument over and over and I think it’s 100 percent wrong - as well as unhelpful. Many people own guns for the purpose of self-protection and they’re not any more “afraid” than you or me. Most wouldn’t be considered afraid at all. They are just deciding that their circumstances are such that relying on themselves to protect themselves and families is more appropriate than relying on law enforcement alone. You prefer to rely on law enforcement alone and that’s your right.

Your argument is unhelpful because you’re belittling or denigrating gun owners rather than actually understanding them. That’s a requirement for productive debate - which is what this country needs.
 
Effing ghouls.

So, I don't want to ever hear the following arguments ever again out of the GOP:

1. Only good guys w guns stop bad guys w guns - bullshit. Big tough Texas cops let that kid hang out in that school for 40 minutes.

2. Mental health - bullshit. A kid crashed his car, donned all in black carrying a rifle after shooting his grandma and still found time to make his way into a school, passed security somehow. Nobody thought the kid a bit odd in those few moments?

3. 18 year olds should be able to buy ARs but not rent cars - give me a break, dudes.

How the party of God has draped itself in this 2nd Amendment gobblygook is beyond me.

That NRA convention should be cancelled and I'd bet my retirement and house that God and Jesus agree with me.
I DOUBT GOD AGREES THAT A BOMB SHOULD BE DROPPED ON THE NRA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoopsdoc1978
No, I think we can stop at the NRA. I remember reading that they were in danger of going bankrupt awhile back. Hopefully that happens and we can see what happens to gun laws without the chucklef**ks at the NRA mucking things up.
The NRA is just a collection of people, Ban the NRA and those people will go to another entity.
 
The NRA is just a collection of people, Ban the NRA and those people will go to another entity.
Many have been going to gun owners of America which is even more uncompromising than the NRA and in fact regularly criticizes them for what they consider the NRA’s compromises on gun rights.

The NRA is still the great boogeyman though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Many have been going to gun owners of America which is even more uncompromising than the NRA and in fact regularly criticizes them for what they consider the NRA’s compromises on gun rights.

The NRA is still the great boogeyman though.
No, the Democrats are the NRA's, and gun manufacturer's, golden goose boogeyman.
 
I'll tell you this, if my child was killed in one of these school shootings, I'd join the NRA and get a front row seat during one of their conventions. Just saying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
No, I think we can stop at the NRA. I remember reading that they were in danger of going bankrupt awhile back. Hopefully that happens and we can see what happens to gun laws without the chucklef**ks at the NRA mucking things up.
You don’t think gun manufacturers will find another group to solicit politicians? Again, it blows me away that the NRA is the object of your vitriol & not the people that actually make the policies & laws. Seems kinda dumb…
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT