Disagree completely.
I'm not a "win at all costs" partisan cultist or whatever. I want things on the level, otherwise, why play a compromised game?
When the Dems basically railroaded Bernie out in 2016, while the GOP let things happen as they should (as much as the old guard hated it), you could see which party was more interested in controlled outcomes. As a registered Libertarian, who's main focus was trying to get a third party 15% of the vote, I noticed things...but whatever...if the partisans of that party were OK with it...that's their issue.
Since the 2020 wonky result, the "show us the proof" claim has been the biggest argument for those motivated to keep the results as determined.
Well, now there's a pretty clear measuring stick, where some old white Dem dinosaur drastically outperforms a modern Dem's wet dream...a transcendent, female, black candidate, against a common opponent. How is that possible?
Only thing that has changed, was the officiating of the game. Rules were tightened down. Things were watched. "More secure" than 2020.
I mean, I'm happy with the win...but if there's evidence showing some sort of manipulation to keep Kamala's numbers that low...I want to see it. In fact...I'm 100% OK with a dual party, live televised audit of the votes in any county deemed controversial.