What are the GOP policy proposals to help with the mental illness problem?Mental illness is a serious problem.
What are the GOP policy proposals to help with the mental illness problem?Mental illness is a serious problem.
Google can be your friend.What are the GOP policy proposals to help with the mental illness problem?
Nah. I’m on the slippers slope side of the gun argument.It certainly is. It’s theintersection of a Venn diagram where mental illness and access to guns meet that is really scary. We can’t eliminate either but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to mitigate.
What are the GOP policy proposals to help with the mental illness problem?
Fake news and dumbBleach consumption to wash away bad thoughts?
Fake news and dumb
Provide clip. Never mentioned bleach. Bad memory?That was some good AI when I watched and heard him say it then.
Maybe a doppelgänger.
Provide clip. Never mentioned bleach
Where did he say consume bleach
Where did he say consume bleach
Of course, that’s YOUR definition of an assault rifle. Thats how far YOU’D be willing to go.No, not all semi-auto, just semi-auto high-powered military style rifles. 22LRs and the like aren’t on the table.
Of course, that’s YOUR definition of an assault rifle. Thats how far YOU’D be willing to go.
I can promise you there are a LOT of people who want to go a LOT farther than that.
And when you ban those rifles and another shooting inevitably happens, than we move on to 22 rifles and such.
It’s a losing proposition because mass shootings aren’t happening because we have to many guns.
For the record, I support enhanced red flag laws and waiting periods.
I’ll never support banning actual guns beyond what we already ban.
[/QUOTE
Of course, that’s YOUR definition of an assault rifle. Thats how far YOU’D be willing to go.
I can promise you there are a LOT of people who want to go a LOT farther than that.
And when you ban those rifles and another shooting inevitably happens, than we move on to 22 rifles and such.
It’s a losing proposition because mass shootings aren’t happening because we have to many guns.
For the record, I support enhanced red flag laws and waiting periods.
I’ll never support banning actual guns beyond what we already ban.
Only thing that comes up are articles about Republicans voting down measures to expand mental healthcare access for kids(and adults).Google can be your friend.
Only thing that comes up are articles about Republicans voting down measures to expand mental healthcare access for kids(and adults).
I can respect that. But anybody who would ban a 22LR is bit a serious person.Of course, that’s YOUR definition of an assault rifle. Thats how far YOU’D be willing to go.
I can promise you there are a LOT of people who want to go a LOT farther than that.
And when you ban those rifles and another shooting inevitably happens, than we move on to 22 rifles and such.
It’s a losing proposition because mass shootings aren’t happening because we have to many guns.
For the record, I support enhanced red flag laws and waiting periods.
I’ll never support banning actual guns beyond what we already ban.
I want to see the clip of it. He never said consume bleach. Fake newsYou’ll have to read the article, the part below the headline saying it.
“Fallacy”. Hilarious. You keep trusting the government of yours. Seems like they’re doing a bang up job.The good ole slippery slope so do nothing fallacy. One of my favorites.
I want to see the clip of it. He never said consume bleach. Fake news
“Fallacy”. Hilarious. You keep trusting the government of yours. Seems like they’re doing a bang up job.
Never said consume or bleach. Your whole statement was bs.Is your dispute over consume versus inject?
Never said consume and bleach were never stated. Your whole statement was bs.
We’re not dealing with serious people. As evidenced by Sobester.I can respect that. But anybody who would ban a 22LR is bit a serious person.
You simply regurgitated the legacy media talking points with your choice of words. Tells me a great deal about you. But yes, it was a dumb statement by Trump. And? He never suggested anybody do that. He said they would study it. Dumb, but not harmful to anyone.Inject referring to household cleaner. My bad, that is sane.
You simply regurgitated the legacy media talking points with your choice of words. Tells me a great deal about you. But yes, it was a dumb statement by Trump. And?
Bleach doesn’t cure Covid though. Nobody ever said it did. Trump said the scientists would study it. Dumb statement, but not harmful to anyone. And you admitted in a following response to attributing that statement to Trump.And. I was just suggesting that if injecting bleach cures Covid then maybe it cures mental illness as well. I actually didn’t even reference Trump or anything he said in my original post.
Bleach doesn’t cure Covid though. Nobody ever said it did. Trump said the scientists would study it. Dumb statement, but not harmful to anyone.
He didn’t say it though. So if someone did that, that’s on them.Tell that to the MAGA idiots that went out and drank bleach.
He didn’t say it though. So if someone did that, that’s on them.
He said the scientists would study it. That’s it. You are wrong. If anyone consumed disinfectant, that’s on them.He certainly implied that injection of household cleaners might cure Covid. Very small step from there for MAGA to drink bleach. Proof? They did.
He said the scientists would study it. That’s it. You are wrong.
No he didn’t. You are blatantly lying. He said they’d study it. You are so much of what is wrong with society today.No. I’m not wrong. He told a mentally borderline group that maybe getting household disinfectants into their bodies would save their lives.
And even if it hadn’t caused any harm, what does this have to do with my original post?
Finally, it causes de facto harm simply by our president being stupid enough to say such a thing.
No he didn’t. You are blatantly lying. He said they’d study it. You are so much of what is wrong with society today.
I get what you’re saying, but reasonable people can agree on the most lethal long gun varieties. We can see them is most all mass shootings. Let’s start there.Of course, that’s YOUR definition of an assault rifle. Thats how far YOU’D be willing to go.
I can promise you there are a LOT of people who want to go a LOT farther than that.
And when you ban those rifles and another shooting inevitably happens, than we move on to 22 rifles and such.
It’s a losing proposition because mass shootings aren’t happening because we have to many guns.
For the record, I support enhanced red flag laws and waiting periods.
I’ll never support banning actual guns beyond what we already ban.
Geez give it up.Tell that to the MAGA idiots that went out and drank bleach.
What is the point?Whether he had it legally or not is not the point.
What is the point?
Old saying, but effective---"Guns do not kill----People with guns do."
I have guns. Not a one of them have ever gotten out of the safe, grabbed my car keys, drove into town, and killed a bunch of people...
Guns are not the issue. People are.
Or the ass-backward interpretation of it in the holler.
2 students, 2 teachers killed at Georgia high school; shooter was 14-year-old student, police say
Four people — two 14-year-old students and two teachers — were killed and nine others were injured in a shooting at Apalachee High School in Winder, Georgia, on Wednesday, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation said.www.wcvb.com
Bombs don’t kill either. Maybe we should start selling those then.