FIFYI justseewant to imagine a pretty strong correlation between non-IU grads and those most interested in taking on a coach with issues
FIFYI justseewant to imagine a pretty strong correlation between non-IU grads and those most interested in taking on a coach with issues
I have much better grammar than whatever you just attempted.FIFY
Name them. Don't you think UK and UL were interested in whoever you name? They're not really candidates if they aren't interested. When IUNorth has tried to answer that, the first names he lists are Stevens, Oats, and Pearl. Pearl is the only 1 of those 3 that might have an interest and I don't think he's an option either with his age, and current success at Auburn. But, still worth a call. Bennett, Wright, TJO, Barnes... those guys aren't options either, imo.He would be a massive upgrade to what we have now. However we will have several equal to or better candidates to choose from that don't have the extra baggage.
Really? I cut and pasted from your post all except replacing "see" with "want to imagine". I don't think there's any correlation there.I have much better grammar than whatever you just attempted.
lol good one Bro. I have an MBA but not from Lincoln trail.I just see a pretty strong correlation between non-IU grads and those most interested in taking on a coach with issues. Maybe he's an alum and doesn't fit that description like you do, but I don't believe that's the case.
I don't know why you're not proud of your Lincoln Trail CC education. Shout it from the rooftops bro.
It appears mistakes are not allowed at all. One mistake and you are out.lol good one Bro. I have an MBA but not from Lincoln trail.
As for your assumption…coaches with issues. Coaching is a career and many coaches have had “issues”. Are they not allowed to move on from that mistake or learn from that mistake?
Just like Nebraska.Somehow we're still one of the most valuable basketball programs.
You know there are levels of severity when it comes to mistakes. Make a big enough one and doors start to close / opportunities can be limited.It appears mistakes are not allowed at all. One mistake and you are out.
I am still waiting to see the crimes he was charged and convicted of? Once the sentence is handed down let me know.You know there are levels of severity when it comes to mistakes. Make a big enough one and doors start to close.
You don’t understand the brand damage and risk to the university that would come with this hire. It’s not about convicted or not.I am still waiting to see the crimes he was charged and convicted of? Once the sentence is handed down let me know.
I've listed plenty of other names. I list those unlikely guys, every time, because Dolson would be negligent to not reach out to them. And we're 4 years removed from Stevens having interest. I've said, in basically ever post I've listed him in that its unlikely...and it is. But he did have interest 4 years ago, but obviously not enough. Maybe less now, maybe more?Name them. Don't you think UK and UL were interested in whoever you name? They're not really candidates if they aren't interested. When IUNorth has tried to answer that, the first names he lists are Stevens, Oats, and Pearl. Pearl is the only 1 of those 3 that might have an interest and I don't think he's an option either with his age, and current success at Auburn. But, still worth a call. Bennett, Wright, TJO, Barnes... those guys aren't options either, imo.
I wonder what percentage of IU fans are not alumni. I would venture to guess it's in the area of 90.I just see a pretty strong correlation between non-IU grads and those most interested in taking on a coach with issues. Maybe he's an alum and doesn't fit that description like you do, but I don't believe that's the case.
I don't know why you're not proud of your Lincoln Trail CC education. Shout it from the rooftops bro.
I haven’t seen one comment about ole miss damage? I see praise on ESPN about how well they are playing. I didn’t see the media bashing St. John’s for hiring Pitino.You don’t understand the brand damage and risk to the university that would come with this hire. It’s not about convicted or not.
There won't be much flack or push back until it flares up again. No one was talking about Sampson's issues at IU when we were 20-2...until the IU internal investigation findings came out...then it quickly blew up, and nuke missiled our program. Maybe nothing ever comes up from all this ever again. I hope so, for Beard, and for everyone else involved. I just believe there will be enough other viable candidates, that would ALSO be successful at IU, that risking the flare up...or risking Beard recreating such an incident...isn't worth it.I haven’t seen one comment about ole miss damage? I see praise on ESPN about how well they are playing. I didn’t see the media bashing St. John’s for hiring Pitino.
Did Texas Texh get blasted for hiring RMK after IU fired him? I think this is a made up argument of damage to the brand. The damage to the brand is being done by not winning.
Most decent high school coaches would put us in a better spot than we're in right now. We can't let that be the bar (and I know you're not suggesting that it should be), but the "Coach X would be better than Woodson" sentiment is both true and also says nothing.There are dozens, if not a hundred or so, coaches that will put IU in a better spot than we're in right now.
Of course. I just don't get the constant negativity on what we're about to go through. Indiana is still one of the most prestigious jobs in the country. And there are a lot of good, smart, coaches out there. People are crapping on Mark Pope right now...he basically had to start over, and Kentucky has been a top 10 level team for mutliple weeks. And he was probably their 3rd, 4th, 5th?? choice? When and if IU has to audible and go with their 4th or 5th choice, and they produce results similar to what Pope has produced...that would be one of the top 2-3 seasons we've had since RMK.Most decent high school coaches would put us in a better spot than we're in right now. We can't let that be the bar (and I know you're not suggesting that it should be), but the "Coach X would be better than Woodson" sentiment is both true and also says nothing.
Is Chris Beard your cousin or something? How do you know Beard is even interested in the, not yet open, IU job? At this point the other guys you listed are just as realistic.Name them. Don't you think UK and UL were interested in whoever you name? They're not really candidates if they aren't interested. When IUNorth has tried to answer that, the first names he lists are Stevens, Oats, and Pearl. Pearl is the only 1 of those 3 that might have an interest and I don't think he's an option either with his age, and current success at Auburn. But, still worth a call. Bennett, Wright, TJO, Barnes... those guys aren't options either, imo.
I looked for 30 seconds and the articles on the Beard hire at Ole Miss talk about the DV issues extensively. I see references to "desperation" and "questionable ethics" and explanations as to why they did it. Ole Miss basketball didn't have much to lose, they're bottom of the barrel already. IUBB despite being terrible for 25 years is still very valuable with a lot to lose.I haven’t seen one comment about ole miss damage? I see praise on ESPN about how well they are playing. I didn’t see the media bashing St. John’s for hiring Pitino.
Did Texas Texh get blasted for hiring RMK after IU fired him? I think this is a made up argument of damage to the brand. The damage to the brand is being done by not winning.
ESPN praising the SEC is like your mom saying you're special.I see praise on ESPN about how well they are playing.
Damn Mary! I think that's the first time I've ever agreed with you.ESPN praising the SEC is like your mom saying you're special.
Ok an article is written? Who cares? What’s that do? Nothing, absolutely nothing.I looked for 30 seconds and the articles on the Beard hire at Ole Miss talk about the DV issues extensively. I see references to "desperation" and "questionable ethics" and explanations as to why they did it. Ole Miss basketball didn't have much to lose, they're bottom of the barrel already. IUBB despite being terrible for 25 years is still very valuable with a lot to lose.
When IUBB hires a coach, there will be countless articles written about it, and basically every one will include the DV allegations. Same will go for all the op-eds, interviews, and podcasts about the hire -- we'll get the firestorm of DV discussion like on this board. That is not good.
Fair or not, IU will to some extent be viewed as okay with DV. This is a big problem for people who run the university whether you care about it or not.
And, if Beard has any issues at IU, the damage to IU will be significant. Pam and Scott would be fired.
If I were doing the coaching search, and Beard really wanted the job, I would check into his story with PIs, etc. But my guess is he screwed up and there is no angle that clears his name to such an extent it wouldn't be a PR nightmare to hire him. He would have done this already if he could.
Or praising a program who hasn’t had success in basketball having success.ESPN praising the SEC is like your mom saying you're special.
All the PR around our bball hire mentions DV and how IU is okay with that issue out there. That is very bad. Duh.Ok an article is written? Who cares? What’s that do? Nothing, absolutely nothing.