ADVERTISEMENT

Hire Beard

This is spot on. See UK a year ago. IU is not hiring any established name that proves they can win in a big conference. I would argue iubb is irrelevant outside the state of Indiana
I would possibly entertain Cronin as I think he might have an itch to get back to the Midwest. Has voiced his displeasures with UCLA's NIL situation publicly on more than one occasion as well as cross-country flights every other week. I thought he was a dead man walking after publicly shaming his players a few weeks ago, but naturally they responded positively and are one of the hottest teams in the country right now.

Would be tough to walk away from Westwood right now but IU can offer everything he would be looking for.
 
Conference affiliation isn't irrelevant, NIL isn't irrelevant, fan support isn't irrelevant, resources and facilities aren't irrelevant as far as searching for a new coach goes.
You could say the same thing about Kentucky last offseason and look where they ended up. Kentucky fans have soured immensely on Pope in the last week.
 
I get shooting your shot but maybe only 2-3 of those names you'd have more than a 50-50 shot of landing.

Brad Stevens 0%
Bruce Pearl 0%
Nate Oats 0%
Shaka Smart 10%
Buzz Williams 25%
Dusty May 45%
Ben McCollum - Drake 75%
Darian DeVries - West Virginia 60%
Grant McCasland - Texas Tech 10%
Chris Jans - Mississippi State 75%----was previously fired from Bowling Green for drunken, lewd behavior with female students
Mark Byington - Vandy-----50%
Jarrod Calhoun- Utah State----80%
Don't type 0%...you have no idea if that's true. But for sure, obviously, very low percentages. And Dolson would be negligent for not "trying" with some of those top tier guys.

Take Jans off the list then... for sure.

So...if your odds are close to accurate...

May
McCollum
DeVries
Byington
Calhoun

That's 5 guys, with varying degrees of likelihood, that would all be enormous upgrades over our current coach...and all worth firing Woodson, and hiring them. And again, that's a google search, and off the top of my keyboard jockey head... They, obviously, have much deeper connections, abilities, information, etc...

I don't get this negativity and pushback on all these coaching lists. Even if it is an unproven guy like McCollum...the alternative is keeping Woodson. So what the hell are we arguing about here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tammany Hall
Don't type 0%...you have no idea if that's true. But for sure, obviously, very low percentages. And Dolson would be negligent for not "trying" with some of those top tier guys.

Take Jans off the list then... for sure.

So...if your odds are close to accurate...

May
McCollum
DeVries
Byington
Calhoun

That's 5 guys, with varying degrees of likelihood, that would all be enormous upgrades over our current coach...and all worth firing Woodson, and hiring them. And again, that's a google search, and off the top of my keyboard jockey head... They, obviously, have much deeper connections, abilities, information, etc...
Just saw an article that said Iowa is looking at DeVries as the heir apparent to Fran.
 
Don't type 0%...you have no idea if that's true. But for sure, obviously, very low percentages. And Dolson would be negligent for not "trying" with some of those top tier guys.
Problem with this, you start whiffing on top guys like this you're going to get taken to the woodshed by other coach/agents leveraging the IU job as you get more and more desperate. And then you probability of hiring a quality guy only decreases.
 
Problem with this, you start whiffing on top guys like this you're going to get taken to the woodshed by other coach/agents leveraging the IU job as you get more and more desperate. And then you probability of hiring a quality guy only decreases.
This is where Dolson needs to earn his keep...And its not a linear type situation...You don't pursue Stevens for 5 days...move on to Pearl for 5 days...move on to Oats for a few days...on down the list.

You canvas 10-15-20 guys that you think would fit what you're looking for...pretty quickly, you should get a feel for the ones where there's any heartbeat of an interest. Pair the list down to 5-10 guys that you feel comfortable would consider it... Schedule zoom meetings with all of them... then pair the list down a little further based off those Zoom meetings....then get your ass on a plane and visit the final candidates.

I would like to assume Dolson already knows whether Stevens would consider it more this time around. So assuming Stevens is a no, as is most likely, he should already know that.
 
Jeezus. Where TF have you been for the other sixty or so threads about the same thing?
so you are saying IU shouldn’t hire him? Would he be hired by a company he interviewed for based off his quality resume and interview? Yes he would. The holier than though attitude is cracking me up. Beard will he at a high profile gig in next few years bank it.
 
No they won’t…son no coach as ever made a mistake in their personal lives?! Should they be blackballed from coaching ever again?
He's at Ole Miss making $5M/yr, that doesn't fit the definition of blackballed.

But, what happened will limit some of his opportunities. The big brand programs won't like the reputation issues that come with hiring a guy associated with DV. You can dislike it all you want, but they won't hire him.
 
so you are saying IU shouldn’t hire him? Would he be hired by a company he interviewed for based off his quality resume and interview? Yes he would. The holier than though attitude is cracking me up. Beard will he at a high profile gig in next few years bank it.
How freaking obtuse are you? I see maybe two people in this thread saying that they wouldn't support the hire.

Many of the folks in this thread who are alum seem to take the same approach as I do. In the unlikely event that he would be offered the job, I hope he's successful. A lot of the alum know that the optics wouldn't align with the way IU wants to be seen.
 
He's at Ole Miss making $5M/yr, that doesn't fit the definition of blackballed.

But, what happened will limit some of his opportunities. The big brand programs won't like the reputation issues that come with hiring a guy associated with DV. You can dislike it all you want, but they won't hire him.
I bet Dolson gives him a look. If IU wants to stay squeaky clean, they better not look at Pearl either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thcgh
How freaking obtuse are you? I see maybe two people in this thread saying that they wouldn't support the hire.

Many of the folks in this thread who are alum seem to take the same approach as I do. In the unlikely event that he would be offered the job, I hope he's successful. A lot of the alum know that the optics wouldn't align with the way IU wants to be seen.
Relax Vern, just a simple question. I would think Beard would be a Hr hire for IU. Iu currently is seen an underachieving program.
 
I bet Dolson gives him a look. If IU wants to stay squeaky clean, they better not look at Pearl either.
I think most of "you" are lumping DV issue in with all other types of indiscretions. They are not, will not be, ever viewed in the same light as other things like paying players or whatever else might be a more bball specific issue.

Its different, obviously. I think its pretty darn unlikely that IU will choose to take on that risk...again, for the 100th time, when there are going to be other good candidates available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeke4ahs
I think most of "you" are lumping DV issue in with all other types of indiscretions. They are not, will not be, ever viewed in the same light as other things like paying players or whatever else might be a more bball specific issue.

Its different, obviously. I think its pretty darn unlikely that IU will choose to take on that risk...again, for the 100th time, when there are going to be other good candidates available.
Who will be available better than Beard in your opinion?
 
High profile SEC programs... They might jump.
Maybe. The SEC is very good at bball, but they don't have many big time/blue blood brands. His name didn't come up in the UK search last year and a lot of names were involved there. Texas fired him for cause. Tennessee bball is pretty big... I doubt they do it given the optics with their big women's program. We shall see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vern Pain
St John’s hired Pitino…now they look really strong. I’m guessing a Kansas would hire Beard.
Maybe they would, maybe not? Texas sure didn't want the smoke. And it took Beard over a year to get someone to consider him...and it ended up being Ole Miss. He's pretty darn lucky they did, actually. And I strongly suspect all this is a moot point, right now, because he's a "southern dude", and he's already at a school in arguably the best conference in the country, and he probably feels gratitude to Ole Miss.
 
Maybe they would, maybe not? Texas sure didn't want the smoke. And it took Beard over a year to get someone to consider him...and it ended up being Ole Miss. He's pretty darn lucky they did, actually. And I strongly suspect all this is a moot point, right now, because he's a "southern dude", and he's already at a school in arguably the best conference in the country, and he probably feels gratitude to Ole Miss.
I would guess, as you have suggested, that Ole Miss did a thorough investigation into the incident and his overall background/history, and found no basis for an ongoing concern. I also agree that he very likely is not interested in leaving there so quickly, he seems to have a good thing going and there's very likely a feeling of gratitude on his part that they gave him the job.
 
Who will be available better than Beard in your opinion?
I don't get in to the "better" comparisons... I've posted a handful of lists on guys that I think would be successful at Indiana.

Beard, obviously, has proven he's capable of making deep NCAA runs...which is very important. But he's also jumped around a lot, hasn't really shown much that he can maintain a high level program for long stretches...why is it a given that he'd stay at IU? Maybe he'd jump at the Kentucky job in a few years if it opened up, or Kansas as you mentioned? His history shows he's pretty open to jumping ship. Doesn't look like a guy that has turned down many offers before. We can't bash the IU job, saying we aren't gonna attract anyone better, and then just assume a guy that's had 6-7 head coaching jobs in 13 years would stay at IU for 8-10 years. Might as well hire Jim Crutchfield, and hope he has the energy, at age 69, to coach for 4-5 more years, if you're willing to overlook Beard's history, and take that risk on.

Long winded way of providing examples on why he isn't an obviously perfect fit...and none of that mentions his DV issue.

I'd take McCollum over Beard. And I'm much less sure I like McCollum's style than I was even a few weeks ago.
 
Who will be available better than Beard in your opinion?
Again, the point is, IU likely doesn't care for the optics. It's really that simple. There are ad nauseum discussions on whether he really assaulted his girlfriend or not. It was enough to make Texas turn the suspension into termination.

Maybe Scott, Pam, the BOT, and the major donors pull a real shocker and say WTF, let's give it a try. I
 
I would guess, as you have suggested, that Ole Miss did a thorough investigation into the incident and his overall background/history, and found no basis for an ongoing concern. I also agree that he very likely is not interested in leaving there so quickly, he seems to have a good thing going and there's very likely a feeling of gratitude on his part that they gave him the job.
Is this a joke? Ole Miss is such a backwards school in a backwards state with relatively little success in anything that they'd have hired him if he had been convicted of DV, not just accused of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vern Pain
Is this a joke? Ole Miss is such a backwards school in a backwards state with relatively little success in anything that they'd have hired him if he had been convicted of DV, not just accused of it.
Don't know anything about Ole Miss or the state but it's still a D1 state university in a major conference. They have concerns about image.
 
I’m not getting into again. But all of you who have your heart set on Beard are going to be disappointed. He won’t even get an interview. And he shouldn’t.
 
Jeez dude. The case would have continued in spite of the recant if the evidence you cite provided a reasonable basis to continue prosecution.
Again. No it would not. The prosecutor is likely to drop it if the victim wants them too. And often the victim does.
 
Lol no it would not. There is no way the state is going to bring a domestic violence case to trial where the alleged victim sides with the accused. You're an idiot. Trials cost time, and they cost money. A public defender right out of law school would have a field day with the states case in this instance, let alone a big time attorney that Beard could afford to hire.

Nearly 40% of domestic violence cases go unprosecuted and of that 40%, nearly 80% are because the victim refuses to testify/cooperate.

Thanks. It’s astonishing how many guys here have zero understanding of domestic violence cases or more likley really don’t care because they think he’s a good basketball coach. It’s also very rare that domestic violence is a one time event. Combined with an alcohol problem ( which has been rumored several places and times) that’s the very last thing we need.
 
so you are saying IU shouldn’t hire him? Would he be hired by a company he interviewed for based off his quality resume and interview? Yes he would. The holier than though attitude is cracking me up. Beard will he at a high profile gig in next few years bank it.
No he would not. That’s why he is at Ole Miss instead of a high profile school. You think Duke would look at him? North Carolina? Kansas? Purdue for God’s sake. No, they would not.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT