The administration has ordered the IRS to revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status
For $500, Alex, Schools that FAFO.
The administration has ordered the IRS to revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status
No one is requiring Harvard to do anything differentlyFor $500, Alex, Schools that FAFO.
The administration has ordered the IRS to revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status
This is a really slippery slope we're heading down.
You are probably correct but can you say why?This is a really slippery slope we're heading down.
You are probably correct but can you say why?
Right idea wrong implementation per usual with trump.This is a really slippery slope we're heading down.
We seem to be finding a number of slippery slopes lately.This is a really slippery slope we're heading down.
I’d love for some of the people in this clip to be questioned about this apparent hypocrisy, but the Trump administration is also trying to limit their press interaction to sycophantic “news” outlets. Instead, we’ll get to hear Trump tell us how awesome it is to be in better shape than most of the guys in the NFL draft combine.
Do keep in mind that one thing this shows is that this latest action isn’t our first step on that slippery slope.I’d love for some of the people in this clip to be questioned about this apparent hypocrisy, but the Trump administration is also trying to limit their press interaction to sycophantic “news” outlets. Instead, we’ll get to hear Trump tell us how awesome it is to be in better shape than most of the guys in the NFL draft combine.
$50 bil endowment. Faculty making north of $200k. Tax em. Tax em all. Tax churches.Do keep in mind that one thing this shows is that this latest action isn’t our first step on that slippery slope.
Thus my point about Lerner. What happened there wasn’t some kind of bureaucratic oversight.
It doesn’t justify what Trump’s doing here at all. But hypocrisy does abound, doesn’t it?
I am against taxing churches, but Joel Osteen (and others) really challenge that belief.$50 bil endowment. Faculty making north of $200k. Tax em. Tax em all. Tax churches.
Churches set an amount. If they’re bringing in over X amountI am against taxing churches, but Joel Osteen (and others) really challenge that belief.
I do think university academic departments need to be taxed. They aren't not-for-profit by any stretch of the imagination.
My company partners with two universities under license agreements. The schools do pay taxes on that revenue as unrelated biz income. FwiwI am against taxing churches, but Joel Osteen (and others) really challenge that belief.
I do think university academic departments need to be taxed. They aren't not-for-profit by any stretch of the imagination.
I am against taxing churches, but Joel Osteen (and others) really challenge that belief.
I do think university academic departments need to be taxed. They aren't not-for-profit by any stretch of the imagination.
Agree. I think anyone involved with calling for the current weaponization of the IRS should at minimum share the same fate as Lois Lerner. Called to testify in front of of a congressional hearing, placed on administrative leave and quietly forced to retire.Do keep in mind that one thing this shows is that this latest action isn’t our first step on that slippery slope.
Thus my point about Lerner. What happened there wasn’t some kind of bureaucratic oversight.
It doesn’t justify what Trump’s doing here at all. But hypocrisy does abound, doesn’t it?
Agree. I think anyone involved with calling for the current weaponization of the IRS should at minimum share the same fate as Lois Lerner. Called to testify in front of of a congressional hearing, placed on administrative leave and quietly forced to retire.
$50 bil endowment. Faculty making north of $200k. Tax em. Tax em all. Tax churches.
I could see an exemption for small rev churches etcThis is where I'm at.
Can't pick and choose, just have to blanket everyone. Do that and I'm more then okay.
I could see an exemption for small rev churches etc
Problem I would see is if you start giving exemption for some, then others are going to want them as well and then we're just going to be fighting over who gets them and who doesn't.
Tax them all.
At least make them pay property taxes.Churches set an amount. If they’re bringing in over X amount
Agreed re universities
Problem I would see is if you start giving exemption for some, then others are going to want them as well and then we're just going to be fighting over who gets them and who doesn't.
Tax them all.
![]()
for the uninitiated that's the meat market created by mr gatti. just like my big old dong ain't gonna suck itself; that beauty ain't gonna pay for itself. have to leave a little meat on the bone for the pastors actually doing GOD"s work spreading HIS word not the bastardized version of it we get from the peanut gallery on this board i.e. all of those not holding degrees from moody
Harvard students' parents?If you tax the universities, we can all guess what will happen to the cost of tuition. We can argue whether they would need to increase tuition, but we have to be real about who would absorb the cost.
Of course. I was playing on the slippery slope.Harvard student's parents?
![]()
I know. I just wanted to express a little irrational hatred of Harvard.Of course. I was playing on the slippery slope.
Just tread lightly when you discuss the Quakers.I know. I just wanted to express a little irrational hatred of Harvard.
Carry on.
Loved the Quakers ever since this scene from ER:Just tread lightly when you discuss the Quakers.