The players really hung in there tonight to get the W in spite of CAM not having an end of the game plan (twice).
Good energy tonight
- Thread starter ndg700
- Start date
Tell me where you are right. Failure to execute does not mean there is no plan. You are an idiot.
Three starters foul out and the Hoosiers pull out a win in double overtime and you state that they won despite the coaching.
Check all the posts saying the same thing - no end of game plays. How can a coach tell his best players to stand in the far corner from the inbound with 2.2 to go?
OK fairy tale, tell us all what the plan was. Throw it in to Durham and have him launch one from 35’?
That statement just proves that you never played or studied the game. Nothing but a troll.
Which is what we try to do every damn time.
Unfortunately the opposing team knows it.
Romeo is about what, 1 for 6 on last possession game winning plays.
Luckily he got Iverson fading left (which everyone in the world knows Romeo can only go right) which gave him the space he needed to drive and score.
No step back 30 footers.
It was a really nice play and he played a great game on both sides of the ball...but we stand around and either force him the ball or leave him in the opposite corner for some reason.
I hate both options.
Hey idiot? Did you notice Miller's reaction? You still think his plan was exected?
Wait, you Miller looking at AD in disbelief while holding up two fingers and telling AD there were two seconds left? No, the idiot you’re talking to didn’t see that.
Seems like you and Super Hoosier Fan are stalled out on one sentence. A great win for me over the basement dwellers.
And yet you still can’t tell me what Miller’s plan was, or that he even had one. And you certainly can’t explain why he had Romeo in the far corner. Idiot.
Didn’t seem like lack of plan but execution. Clearly he didnt want AD taking that shot. And are you going to give him credit for the failures and NOt the positive play at the end? Hypocritical
You can't prove that he didn't idiot. You posed the idea first. You're a Rivals member for 14 years and your only 10 posts have been on this thread. Not sure what your game is but you really aren't worth the debate anymore and I have put you on "ignore". See ya.
In the last couple of months, I have noticed many posters who have been members for over a decade, but have less than ten posts. And they all seem to have the same "hot take" on CAM and the direction of the program. Are these people who created multiple screen names years ago to bring them up in certain situations to create the illusion of overwhelming consensus? Are they all one person? Are they a group? Has this been going on for years?
Just wondering.
So you're saying that you're not even an original idiot, just one who regurgitates what other idiots have already posted. Duly noted.
Similar threads
