I filed an uncollectible lien. Per usualThe only thing I’m sure of in this scenario is somehow McM (the lawyer) is gonna get paid
I filed an uncollectible lien. Per usualThe only thing I’m sure of in this scenario is somehow McM (the lawyer) is gonna get paid
Look, do you want to control the outcome here, put this all behind you today, or go in front of that mean ole' judge. Here you can have a hand in the outcome; there, you're at the whim of what he ate that day. What do you say? Give me a good faith number I can take back there, and let's see where this goes.Where was the fbi mentioned. Read the op. Read the post ribbon bet you wherein the original article was attached
Settle
And I'm the scumbag selling software...Look, do you want to control the outcome here, put this all behind you today, or go in front of that mean ole' judge. Here you can have a hand in the outcome; there, you're at the whim of what he ate that day. What do you say? Give me a good faith number I can take back there, and let's see where this goes.
Hiring?And I'm the scumbag selling software...
I wish my dad could read this after I told him I wasn't going into politics or applying to law school.
You’ll have to excuse small government, conservative Aloha. He’s quite comfortable with the government putting people on lists and surveiling them.So you went from betting 1000 dollars that she wasn’t put on any list to “well, it’s not a terrorist watch list”.
😂
Fascinating.
Good grief, just a few moments ago, on CNN, Dana Bash seriously asked Senator Tammy Duckworth if Tulsi Gabbard is a “Russian asset.”So Tulsi goes on Fox and criticizes Kamala and goes on Terrorist watch list next day. Who the hell is the dictator?
![]()
Trump reveals why Tim Walz is a 'shocking pick'
Trump said the Democrat ticket would 'want this country to go communist immediately.'www.dailymail.co.uk
Ankle biting ass.You’ll have to excuse small government, conservative Aloha. He’s quite comfortable with the government putting people on lists and surveiling them.
You're a weird dude.Big government fraud.
I’m a logical dude. You like to proclaim how Conservative you are while extolling the need for an ever growing CIA, FBI, Military, NSA.You're a weird dude.
You some strange form of libertarian. Stop posting to me, your opinions are worthless.I’m a logical dude. You like to proclaim how Conservative you are while extolling the need for an ever growing CIA, FBI, Military, NSA.
Conservatism isn’t a la carte. You don’t get to pick the parts of government you want shrunk. You’re ideologically inconsistent and a major fraud. There is nothing Conservative about you.
Wanting radical change of the statuts quo also isn't conservative, though.I’m a logical dude. You like to proclaim how Conservative you are while extolling the need for an ever growing CIA, FBI, Military, NSA.
Conservatism isn’t a la carte. You don’t get to pick the parts of government you want shrunk. You’re ideologically inconsistent and a major fraud. There is nothing Conservative about you.
In the strictest definition of conservative you are correct. In the political definition you are not.Wanting radical change of the statuts quo also isn't conservative, though.
I think there is a lot of conflation of conservatives with those wanting policies favored by the right.In the strictest definition of conservative you are correct. In the political definition you are not.
Yeah. Yeah. What you wrote is essentially Chesterton’s Fence. Chesterton didn’t account for myriad functions that at best serve no real purpose and more likely degrade quality of life.I think there is a lot of conflation of conservatives with those wanting policies favored by the right.
The philosophical underpinnings of conservatives is the recognition of a set of principles that recognize (1) a value to tradition, (2) a suspicion of unfettered "reason" based on a recognition of the limitations of human intelligence, and (3) the costs inherent in all change, with radical change perhaps being exponentially more costly, not linearly so.
Once you throw those away, I'm not sure the policy proscriptions those on the right favor are any more defensible--maybe less so--than the ones on the left.
Nope, it's more than that.Yeah. Yeah. What you wrote is essentially Chesterton’s Fence. Chesterton didn’t account for myriad functions that at best serve no real purpose and more likely degrade quality of life.
Edit: a self serving enterprise will always grow to serve itself.
Do judges work this hard to prevent damages for the guilty party? The entire jury seems to have sent the decision. Why is the Judge negotiating... Guilty on all account$ .Where was the fbi mentioned. Read the op. Read the post ribbon bet you wherein the original article was attached
Settle
Some work hard to promote settlement. Others don’t give a damn.Do judges work this hard to prevent damages for the guilty party? The entire jury seems to have sent the decision. Why is the Judge negotiating... Guilty on all account$ .
Its been reported, right here on this site, that a list like that doesn't exist.Looks like TG was sure as hell on a list no one wants to be on:
![]()
Federal air marshals surveilled Trump Cabinet member Gabbard in 2024, Rand Paul says
Sen. Rand Paul says he viewed records of Tulsi Gabbard's surveillance by air marshals, highlighting issues of privacy and government oversight.www.foxnews.com
Once again the Dims turn out to be doing exactly what they say the Republicans Will do...
Its been reported, right here on this site, that a list like that doesn't exist.
Looks like TG was sure as hell on a list no one wants to be on:
![]()
Federal air marshals surveilled Trump Cabinet member Gabbard in 2024, Rand Paul says
Sen. Rand Paul says he viewed records of Tulsi Gabbard's surveillance by air marshals, highlighting issues of privacy and government oversight.www.foxnews.com
Once again the Dims turn out to be doing exactly what they say the Republicans Will do...
What came up in her confirmation hearings? I didn't really pay any attention to them, but would assume if she should have been on a list, those things would have been brought up there.Did Sen. Paul say what rationale the TSA had for this enhanced scrutiny, or do we just assume it was for nefarious political reasons?
No it wasn’t.Its been reported, right here on this site, that a list like that doesn't exist.
I thought we already established that she was or might have been on the Quiet Skies List and not on the Terrorist Watch List.Looks like TG was sure as hell on a list no one wants to be on:
![]()
Federal air marshals surveilled Trump Cabinet member Gabbard in 2024, Rand Paul says
Sen. Rand Paul says he viewed records of Tulsi Gabbard's surveillance by air marshals, highlighting issues of privacy and government oversight.www.foxnews.com
Once again the Dims turn out to be doing exactly what they say the Republicans Will do...
Travel to certain countries can result in being temporarily placed on that list.Did Sen. Paul say what rationale the TSA had for this enhanced scrutiny, or do we just assume it was for nefarious political reasons?
You’re so fking stupid!Travel to certain countries can result in being temporarily placed on that list.
So are we to believe she was still on the list “temporarily” from a trip to Syria and Lebanon back in 2017? Why wasn’t she placed on the list until the Biden admin?Travel to certain countries can result in being temporarily placed on that list.
Your certainty in spite of your ignorance is something to behold.So are we to believe she was still on the list “temporarily” from a trip to Syria and Lebanon back in 2017? Why wasn’t she placed on the list until the Biden admin?
A public figure? And a patriot?
Political harassment is all it was.
Shut up, you cranky old bitch.You’re so fking stupid!
What came up in her confirmation hearings? I didn't really pay any attention to them, but would assume if she should have been on a list, those things would have been brought up there.
Going forward, im’a send my post to you first.Much like Biden has been in complete command of his faculties for the past five years...
I recall being vilified as not knowing what I was seeing (or talking about) and how I should be ashamed for mentioning dementia as a probable cause...
Pretty certain I missed any of the apologies or, at minimum, a "looks like you were right" acknowledgements about that...
Is that a bruise over your left eye? Oops sorry,No it wasn’t.
You have a way of posting that is sometimes impossible to decipher. I have no idea what you’re trying to say.Is that a bruise over your left eye? Oops sorry,
I was 2” too high I guess. 🤣
Didn't you bet someone $1000 she wasn't on the Quiet Skies List?I thought we already established that she was or might have been on the Quiet Skies List and not on the Terrorist Watch List.
No. The bet was on the Terrorist Watch List. They are not the same.Didn't you bet someone $1000 she wasn't on the Quiet Skies List?
Not just a standing invite to Dream Team events,Didn't you bet someone $1000 she wasn't on the Quiet Skies List?
I figured if anyone knew it would be you. I assumed your DVR was full of her saved confirmation hearings.I have no idea one way or the other.
I'm not necessarily supportive of the scrutiny, but I'd need to know the "probable cause" they had for it before making up my mind. The Syria trip seems to be a stretch.
Wait, Is goat, aloha too, after all these post.Didn't you bet someone $1000 she wasn't on the Quiet Skies List?
She's far less attractive swinging on Trump's nuts.I figured if anyone knew it would be you. I assumed your DVR was full of her saved confirmation hearings.
![]()