Give Marshall the advantages of IU, I guarantee you UK would never want to play IU ever again.
Give Marshall the advantages of IU, I guarantee you UK would never want to play IU ever again.
Yes, that's a guarantee that is worth, well, nothing. Kentucky will play anyone. What a lame statement.
Uh, they won't play a Crean team in Assembly Hall or their own arena.Yes, that's a guarantee that is worth, well, nothing. Kentucky will play anyone. What a lame statement.
What?
Cal won't play us nowYes, that's a guarantee that is worth, well, nothing. Kentucky will play anyone. What a lame statement.
What? He said he guarantees Kentucky will never want to play Indiana ever again if we get Gregg Marshall. Lame. Dumb, and lame. What does he think is going to happen, Kentucky, Purdue, Wisconsin, Louisville, everyone else is going to forfeit future games against us?
Crapapari was just in a fight for his life with a Marshall- coached team full of 3 stars. Put Marshall on IU's bench, have Romeo Langford put on that jersey, and that smug greaseball's smirk will be erased faster than you can say Tom Crean SucksYes, that's a guarantee that is worth, well, nothing. Kentucky will play anyone. What a lame statement.
Uh, they won't play a Crean team in Assembly Hall or their own arena.
Tell me again why we should hold onto Crean? Shut the f up.Which has nothing to do with your statement. You said Kentucky would never want to play IU again. Kentucky has offered to play us in Indianapolis and elsewhere. I applaud Glass and Crean for telling Kentucky to kiss our asses, but the idea that hiring Gregg Marshall is going to lead to Kentucky or anyone else to never want to play us again, and to guarantee it? Hitting the sauce?
Cal won't play us now
You take everything so literalWhich has nothing to do with your statement. You said Kentucky would never want to play IU again. Kentucky has offered to play us in Indianapolis and elsewhere. I applaud Glass and Crean for telling Kentucky to kiss our asses, but the idea that hiring Gregg Marshall is going to lead to Kentucky or anyone else to never want to play us again, and to guarantee it? Hitting the sauce?
Congrats, you took a big dump on another thread and ruined it.You mean both schools have chosen not to agree to terms on where to play, because IU wanted on campus, UK didn't. Fixed it for you.
Congrats, you took a big dump on another thread and ruined it.
No, you don't use facts. You unnecessarily nitpick stuff to death and are a fool trying to act like the smartest guy in the room. Your schtick has worn out its welcome.Because I used facts? We're in a weird world where facts ruin threads. Then again, we are in a world where alt facts are now part of the deal, so why should I be surprised.
No, you don't use facts. You unnecessarily nitpick stuff to death and are a fool trying to act like the smartest guy in the room. Your schtick has worn out its welcome.
Define irony, smart guy: I don't think it means what you think it means. You do want to nitpick, right?Irony
Cause we can't pay as much at UkI'm a UK fan but no trolling. Just my two cents. I'd be concerned as a fan of a school of IUs caliber that Marshall's strategy at a mid major will not translate to a high major elite setting. Why do you guys insist on going the route of coaching up 3 star guys when you are Indiana and can compete for every 5 star?
You do realize that he took you guys to the wire both times in the tournament both times with a lot less talent. At IU he won't have to settle for high 3 or low 4 star players and he would bring in better in state talent.I'm a UK fan but no trolling. Just my two cents. I'd be concerned as a fan of a school of IUs caliber that Marshall's strategy at a mid major will not translate to a high major elite setting. Why do you guys insist on going the route of coaching up 3 star guys when you are Indiana and can compete for every 5 star?
Cause we can't pay as much at Uk
You do realize that he took you guys to the wire both times in the tournament both times with a lot less talent. At IU he won't have to settle for high 3 or low 4 star players and he would bring in better in state talent.
Trolls have too.You take everything so literal
but Gregg Marshall is one of the top 5-7 coaches in college basketball and Crean is not.So did Tom Crean.
So did Tom Crean.
He's emotionally compromised by orange butthurt and believes he can sooth his sores and make Crean a better coach by making silly arguments.You take everything so literal
He had to beat someone to last his nine pathetic years.Crean actually beat you guys, multiple times. Three or four times Crean has beaten Kentucky in the NCAAs. He has your NCAA number.
Well, maybe...if things fall through with Billy Donovan...but right now it's all good...
He's a better coach than Calipari.
He's a better coach than Calipari.
Marshall is putting forth almost the same product as Calipari at a mid-major: UK's Tourney games against Marshall should NOT be as close as they have been.Ne he's not. Unless you want to say recruiting isn't part of being a college coach.