He's gone after Chris Krebs as well. Simply for not agreeing with the Big Lie.
Trump (or any general government executive) is wrong to sic prosecutors on anybody. Many do it. You need tone down that Putin, Maduro, Xi baloney.
make one serious post and I’d engage you. But I’ve retired from putting up with jerkoffs.
I don’t get it. You MAGAs have your guy back in the White House, with his executive power growing by the day. You’ve also got the relatively rare government trifecta and a regime leader who’s surrounded by loyalists who are more than happy to do his personal bidding. (No more pesky John Kelly, Jim Mattis or Mark Milley types to try to keep him on the straight and narrow). Yet there’s all this simmering anger. Seems like many/most of you are ready to blow at any time. Now Mark’s a jerkoff. Honest question: what’s wrong with you?
Mark has always been a jerkoff. That part hasn’t changed. But I’m not the one ready to blow. Look at the threads about Trump. The never Trumpers have lost it. Now go burn a Tesla or something.
I would, if the shoe didn’t fit. But does it not?
Denial. Projection. Flippancy. False equivalences and other fallacies. Your stock-in-trade.
Because you need a security clearance to get information from the government to sue Republicans.
Imagine that - after being called a traitor and every other name in the book, Trump has the temerity to do the same to one of his critics.
Trump Orders DOJ To Investigate Prominent Critic in Shocking Oval Office Remarks: ‘I Think He’s Guilty of Treason’
Trump went so far as to accuse Taylor of committing treason, a capital offense, for writing about what he saw during Trump’s first term.www.mediaite.com
There is no way to know beforehand who can access on a 'need to know' basis.
Dammit, you're ruining a perfectly good Trump conspiracy theory.This is the body that oversees the admin, security, etc. of federal courts throughout the country (although each courthouse is usually independently managed by its own judiciary and admin):
In Profile: The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts – Annual Report 2023
Statutory Authority 28 U.S.C. §§ 601-613. Congress established the Administrative Officeof the U.S. Courts (AO) in 1939 to provide administrative support to federal courts. The Director of the AO carries out statutory responsibilities and performs other duties under the supervision and...www.uscourts.gov
You'll notice it's created by statute but "the Director of the AO carries out statutory responsibilities and performs other duties under the supervision and direction of the Judicial Conference of the United States, the Judiciary’s principal policy-making body."
So I don't think the President has the power to say who can and cannot go into a federal courthouse--it's a separation of powers issue.
He doesn't either. UncleMark just like to pretend he's a legal expert, based on what he's heard on MSNBC and read in the NYT.
Big difference, DANK. Trump is above the law. He also controls the DOJ, which he is fully politicizing to go after dissenters like Taylor and Krebs.
The first part is the clearance. A person with a clearance can be given access when he is deemed to have a need to know. But lawyers without a clearance can’t be granted access. There is a reason I had Top Secret, and still do, but only saw it when I had a need to know.
No.Trump Broke New York Criminal Law Again. Alvin Bragg Should Indict Again.
There is no time to wait. Bragg should take this case to a grand jury.slate.com
Cant open. Have another link?This is very inseemly at best and looks a whole hell of a lot like extortion.
Trump announces deals with more law firms for a combined $600 million — The Washington Post
Firms seeking to avoid sanctions from President Donald Trump have agreed to provide nearly $1 billion in legal services to causes he supports.apple.news
This is very inseemly at best and looks a whole hell of a lot like extortion.
Trump announces deals with more law firms for a combined $600 million — The Washington Post
Firms seeking to avoid sanctions from President Donald Trump have agreed to provide nearly $1 billion in legal services to causes he supports.
This isn't a deal involving national security clearance. This is a deal with the EEOC over these different law firms' hiring practices.
thehill.com
Hey Sarah. SARAH!!!
This isn't a deal involving national security clearance. This is a deal with the EEOC over these different law firms' hiring practices.
As for the causes he supports, here they are:
“President Trump and the Law Firms both support and agree to work on, including in the following areas: Assisting Veterans and other Public Servants, including, among others, members of the Military, Gold Star families, Law Enforcement, and First Responders; ensuring fairness in our Justice System; and combatting Antisemitism,” Trump wrote in announcing the deals on Truth Social.
Trump announces $600 million in new deals with five law firms
President Trump announced a series of agreements with five major law firms Friday, signing deals for some $600 million in pro bono work as the Trump administration continues its pressure campaign o…
Nope, more law firms have offered 100s of millions of dollars of legal services to the Trump administration to avoid the EO penalties of loss of clearances and no access to government buildings. These law firms did nothing more than provide legal services to clients President Trump doesn’t like. This retribution and revenge crap is among the most outrageous things I’ve ever seen a President do.
The article I linked had no mention of access to govt. buildings. The settlements do not involve the EOs, they are linked to the EEOC. And I think you're wrong about these law firms not doing anything wrong--I'm guessing they didn't want to litigate their hiring practices for a very good reason.
thehill.com
