My understanding was that schools didn't have a choice but to accept an NIT bid.. Has that changed in recent years??
IU refused it in creans last season.My understanding was that schools didn't have a choice but to accept an NIT bid.. Has that changed in recent years??
No they didn’t. They played a “home” game at GT.IU refused it in creans last season.
Oh damn. That’s right. He refused the “Home” game.No they didn’t. They played a “home” game at GT.
If our fanbase has enough lack of class for that to be a real concern, we don't deserve a winning team.i believe that was a special deal so Crean wouldn’t get booed at home on ESPN
If our fanbase has enough lack of class for that to be a real concern, we don't deserve a winning team.
The "official" story was IU declined a home game because students were on Spring Break.Oh damn. That’s right. He refused the “Home” game.
No, I think they've always had the option to decline. How could they make them? That'd be like we want you to play in the Great Alaska shootout and they'll be severe consequences if you don'tMy understanding was that schools didn't have a choice but to accept an NIT bid.. Has that changed in recent years??
No—the official story was “construction” at SSAH. (Which would just happen to be completed in time for the women to host BALL in the WNIT.)The "official" story was IU declined a home game because students were on Spring Break.
Yes, that's the way it went down. We went to GA Tech and still lost in an about as an inspired effort as you'd expect. This time they should use it for experience, and I mean like start the likely starters for next year that we have, not TJD, Rob, or Race. See what we got, we aren't winning that either, so might as well use it as exhibition games against real competitionThe "official" story was IU declined a home game because students were on Spring Break.
36 best. Maybe stretch that to 48, but the last 20 are teams we likely would beat.But we can't be one of the 68 best ?