The right to enter into contracts or to buy and sell property does not imply a right to force others to contract with us or transfer property to us, much less make us feel valued and included. Part of the conceptual confusion here arises from the presumption that “rights” reflect democratic values and any entitlements agreed upon by majority vote. Progressives suppose that any claim agreed upon by a majority is tantamount to a right, from which it follows that legal force is required to protect and enforce that right.
In truth, democratic values are not the same thing as rights. The rights to life, liberty, and property are based on self-ownership and vest equally in each human being. Life, liberty, and property are individual rights, not merely “shared values.” These rights are often described as inalienable, meaning that nobody has power or authority to abolish them. Even if a majority were to agree by democratic process to divest others of these basic rights, that agreement would not abolish those rights but would simply constitute tyranny.
In truth, democratic values are not the same thing as rights. The rights to life, liberty, and property are based on self-ownership and vest equally in each human being. Life, liberty, and property are individual rights, not merely “shared values.” These rights are often described as inalienable, meaning that nobody has power or authority to abolish them. Even if a majority were to agree by democratic process to divest others of these basic rights, that agreement would not abolish those rights but would simply constitute tyranny.
Free Markets and the Antidiscrimination Principle | Mises Institute
The right to be able to enter into contracts with others is fundamental to free markets and a free society. That means people should be able to engage in
mises.org