I have never seen anyone suggest he is an elite coach
Ironically, as divided as people are over whether they appear to be "pro" or "anti crean", both sides appear to me to be a lot closer than they realize.
It isn't anyone's opinion of what kind of coach he is, but rather what should be done, and what should be acceptable at IU.
Maybe I am off base here, but it seems that there are largely two sides to the coin:
Tails:
Tom Crean isn't an elite coach. However, we should just let this play out. He isn't going anywhere so we should just support him, the program and the team. There are probably 4-5 coaches just in the Big Ten that are better than him, but who can we get that is any better than him? What we need is stability. I am afraid what would happen if we replaced him, we might stink next year, and I think we can be pretty good next year.
Heads:
Tom Crean isn't an elite coach. IU is a special program that demands elite status, and an elite coach. If we were KY, KU, UNC, etc, he would have already been fired. When I watch IU I root for them to win, however I also see that our program is balancing on the edge of long term lameness. I don;t want to have IU basketball be on par with Minnesota, Illinois, or Purdue. And unless a change is made, that is what we will become.