Who created the “peer review pay-2-play” that has utterly corrupted the academy over the last 60 years and bastardized science: Ghislaine Maxwells father
Corruption of Science; no more coincidences
- Thread starter Hoosier in Mad Town
- Start date
This is spot on and is exactly how OS became filled to the brim with shit.
A lot of it has turned into centralized state funded garbage. It’s another reason why fiat currencies suck and we need separation of State and money. We currently have a system where governments print money to fund institutions that push nonsense to scare the public into giving them more money and control….aka Climate Change.
Thank God Terrence Howard was there.
www.independent.co.uk
Keep believing people like that, they are better than DBM's Twitter sources.
Actor Terrence Howard claims he can ‘kill gravity’ on Joe Rogan’s show
The actor also said he remembers the day he was born
www.independent.co.uk
Keep believing people like that, they are better than DBM's Twitter sources.
You clearly didn’t watch the clip. Weinstein proved your point that Howard is a quack.Thank God Terrence Howard was there.
Actor Terrence Howard claims he can ‘kill gravity’ on Joe Rogan’s show
The actor also said he remembers the day he was born
Keep believing people like that, they are better than DBM's Twitter sources.
That doesn’t take away from the point made in the show but you do have to possess the ability to hold two thoughts together concurrently
The whole point of the episode was for more or less for Weinstein to debunk Howard’s quackery. Marv’s stupid and lazy quip is really stupid and lazy.
There absolutely are a LOT of nonsense journals out there.
It's why you rubes fall for such bullshit since you don't know enough to....
pay attention to studies published in (say) the New England Journal of Medicine
ignore studies published in (say) the International Journal of Current Innovation Research
The first is science-based and is rigorously peer reviewed by MDs in the field
the second will publish anything you pay them to publish and it has a sciencey-sounding name to fool the rubes
www.newyorker.com
It's why you rubes fall for such bullshit since you don't know enough to....
pay attention to studies published in (say) the New England Journal of Medicine
ignore studies published in (say) the International Journal of Current Innovation Research
The first is science-based and is rigorously peer reviewed by MDs in the field
the second will publish anything you pay them to publish and it has a sciencey-sounding name to fool the rubes
“Paging Dr. Fraud”: The Fake Publishers That Are Ruining Science
For years, spurious journals have proliferated online, promising academic credibility in exchange for cash.
Last edited:
