I expect the Committee currently views IU , Clemson, Alabama and even South Carolina as “very close.”Clemson loss is good for IU. They were breathing down our necks and Warde Manuel, the committee chair, said last weekend they viewed IU and Clemson as very close. Not now, assuming we take care of business tonight.
That's what they would say on TV, yes, because when they are on TV their primary concern is selling the Playoff, not providing accurate analysis. They aren't going to say IU has the inside track and they control their own destiny, even though I think that is pretty close to the truth. If they pander to the other three fan bases and keep them engaged they sell more Dr. Pepper ads.I expect the Committee currently views IU , Clemson, Alabama and even South Carolina as “very close.”
No.I expect the Committee currently views IU , Clemson, Alabama and even South Carolina as “very close.”
I didn’t say any of them would automatically jump IU, I said if IU struggled with Purdue then (at least) one of them could.No.
Clemson had a shot to jump us because they had just two losses prior to today and a win over SC would have enhanced their resume. That didn’t happen and now Clemson, Bama and SC are all 3-loss teams. None of those three will jump IU assuming we take care of business tonight.