ADVERTISEMENT

Co-President Musk

Presidents and their department heads come and go while the bureaucrats hold their positions for years and years.
This is the problem.

Over the years in executing the laws the bureaucrats adapt old laws to new challenges. It can be argued in executing the laws the bureaucrats alter the original intent of Congress which passed the laws in the first place.
Bureaucrats are not risk takers, innovative or entrepreneurial. They have value, but change and innovation is not part of their value.

Finally we cannot ignore Congress which provides the money so the bureaucrats can enforce the laws.
True. But with thousands of page omnibus spending authority, containing lord knows
pending targets, without an honest attempt to establish priorities or set a budget, Congress is a massive failure.

Given all this, presidents historically have complained about being powerless. Trump and Co., however, seem determine to change history.
This is because presidents and their Washington insider staffs become subject to the inefficient government system.

Trump is changing history and I am very pleased with that. He has blown the “Washington Way” to smithereens. Just as Musk revolutionized rocketry and other things, Trump is doing the same with the executive branch. I don’t buy for a second he violates separation of powers. Everything he is doing is within the executive branch constitutional authority. We don’t need endless processes, committees, staffers, and thousands of regulations to make government more efficient and productive.

We’ve heard for years that government computers are antiquated and inefficient. Well, so is government.
 
The Democratic Party Potemkin village is starting to catch ablaze.

Trumps approvals continue to rise, Democratic Party approval near all time lows. have.

The village is propped up by stuff like the DoEd, USAID, corporate press. A projection of power and support that they don’t actually have.

People are overwhelmingly supportive of Trump’s first 20 days. Only the corporate press, and Stalinists like our friends on this board continue to resist.

Democrats are all noise, no signal.
 
Last edited:
Quit repackaging what I said. There is no “codified path” for how a president and staff does its job. A codified path would violate separation of powers. I said he doesn’t need to follow ALL the rules.
As I said, zealot partisan. You never granted Biden an in of leeway in anything. Nor Obama.

Where has Congress approved this:

It MAY be a good idea, but it was created by congressional vote, funded by congressional money.

Sending unvetted people in to receive Social Security numbers, classified data, and health information is something the true conservatives here see as wrong. Kudos to them. I'll stop saying you want a dictator when you show the tiniest amount of spine on the issue.

As I pointed out before, I agreed Biden didn't have the power to forgive student loans. I should have just said he didn't need to follow all the rules.
 
The Democratic Party Potemkin village is starting to catch ablaze.

Trumps approvals continue to rise, Democratic Party approval near all time lows.

The village is propped up by stuff like the DoEd, USAID, corporate press.

People are overwhelmingly supportive of Trump’s first 20 days. Only the corporate press, and stalinists like our friends on this board continue to resist.

Democrats are all noise, no signal.
the funny part is that while the Democrats and leftists here yell and scream about congressional appropriations being sacrosanct, they object and resist all Musk’s efforts to make sure government spending actually matches appropriations and are documented in such a way that the spending can be audited for compliance with law. The Democrats only want to oppose Trump and call musk names.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jet812
the funny part is that while the Democrats and leftists here yell and scream about congressional appropriations being sacrosanct, they object and resist all Musk’s efforts to make sure government spending actually matches appropriations and are documented in such a way that the spending can be audited for compliance with law. The Democrats only want to oppose Trump and call musk names.

Show me a post a person has said they oppose documenting purchases. Go ahead, show me one.
 
This is the problem.


Bureaucrats are not risk takers, innovative or entrepreneurial. They have value, but change and innovation is not part of their value.


True. But with thousands of page omnibus spending authority, containing lord knows
pending targets, without an honest attempt to establish priorities or set a budget, Congress is a massive failure.


This is because presidents and their Washington insider staffs become subject to the inefficient government system.

Trump is changing history and I am very pleased with that. He has blown the “Washington Way” to smithereens. Just as Musk revolutionized rocketry and other things, Trump is doing the same with the executive branch. I don’t buy for a second he violates separation of powers. Everything he is doing is within the executive branch constitutional authority. We don’t need endless processes, committees, staffers, and thousands of regulations to make government more efficient and productive.

We’ve heard for years that government computers are antiquated and inefficient. Well, so is government.

CoH, you have high hopes in terms of Trump and Co. turning government into a smooth running operation along with not over stepping executive branch authority as established by our constitution.

Only time will tell if your high hopes materialize and to what degree.
 
The Democratic Party Potemkin village is starting to catch ablaze.

Trumps approvals continue to rise, Democratic Party approval near all time lows.

The village is propped up by stuff like the DoEd, USAID, corporate press.

People are overwhelmingly supportive of Trump’s first 20 days. Only the corporate press, and stalinists like our friends on this board continue to resist.

Democrats are all noise, no signal.
Loved the cheers he got at the game last night…
 
CoH, you have high hopes in terms of Trump and Co. turning government into a smooth running operation along with not over stepping executive branch authority as established by our constitution.

Only time will tell if your high hopes materialize and to what degree.
You are half right.
 
Does putting an entire agency that had a codified existence on admin leave and announcing it's going to be 'shut down' go way the hell beyond what your just described?

Could another radical President decide to disband the military and dwarf the DOD down to 500 admin staff? And claim they are still fulfilling Congressional authorization?
He can’t shut down or move USAID w/o Congressional approval.

He could severely downsize it, etc. which I’m surprised his admin wasn’t smart enough to figure out. Phase it in over a year or two and achieve the same thing with much less commotion.

Although he might be throwing everything up against the wall to see what sticks. He’s certainly caught the Dems flat footed on a lot of his actions so far.
 
I heard a story on BBC Radio News as I was driving this morning.

Do you know what organization is the #1 employer of musicians in the world?

answer: The US Military

I guess every branch had multiple bands, paying the musicians, conductors, paying for shows, paying song arrangers and songwriters. I like a good band, don't get me wrong. Probably generates good PR. And I don't know what is the total outlay. Less than a fighter jet? probably

The point is... when you look for bloat, you are probably going to find it. But you don't cut down on music expenses by first shutting off all funding to the military. That seems to be Musk's approach with other programs.
 
Absolute power? I am sure we called the king a dictator and after the magna carta he didn't come close to absolute power
. . . and many kings were not, in fact, dictators. King George surely wasn't, despite the propaganda ginned up by our rebellious forefathers.

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more

dic·ta·tor
/ˈdikˌtādər/
noun

  1. 1.
    a ruler with total power over a country, typically one who has obtained control by force.
 
Lucy mentioned audits, audits are great. I had a job where I was part Tech, part Accounting. In that time I went through 2 financial audits. Both were conducted by people trained in and certified in financial auditing and overseen by a CPA. The paperwork, the questions, all were well documented. No one sent in a coder to do the financial audit.

In the computer audits, also two, things were done very similarly. In fact the format of the audit was created by accounting auditors with the person who would head up the IT side. So it makes sense it was pretty identical. The people that came were IT people, again with IT certifications. They didn't bring in people adept at totally different fields.

People have a goal in mind and they want to get there no matter the path. That's my point about dictatorship. It is fine to cut government. Musk may hit upon some great things. But he has to stay on the path we have codified. You aren't always going to like the president. Don't fall victim to the "it's ok when my guy does it" trap because it ain't always going to be your guy. It isn't always going to be a goal you want. The rules have to be the rules for everyone.

Before you had over classified info, or even Social Security numbers and health records, the people need vetted. That' simple. I will guarantee you any reasonable CPA would say that's true. @stollcpa , would you advise a client to turn over SSN and HIPAA data to unvetted people?
No
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT