ADVERTISEMENT

Chris Beard

Engaging in totally irresponsible speculation here, but my guess is that this wasn't the only time a situation between Beard and his wife got not intercourse physical. Seems to me from reading the reports, it escalated like these two had done this before. It wasn't handbags at 20 paces, it read like Sgt. Slaughter vs the Iron Sheik in 1984....
They weren't married.
 
How do you imagine he choked her?
Like this


200w.gif
 
Sure, but we're splitting hairs here, no? Is one worse then the other?
I think all the details matter and I think it is highly likely the officer's affidavit is slanted and contains inaccuracies (not that you have to believe it all in order to believe Beard did enough that you want to stay away from his as the university's flagship hire). It's internally inconsistent and she later recanted.

I'm also pointing out how people think they know the whole story and do not. It's common for people to fill in details using some narrative they already know or one they want to be true. All people do it--trial lawyers exploit and have to defend against this tendency all the time.

Theoretically, here, sure it could be a different thing. For example, I wrestle with my son all the time. Headlocks are common. Putting my hands around his neck like Knight did to Reid has never occurred. Was Beard trying to restrain her from attacking him when he did that? I don't know. Her story after the arrest and his story suggest that is possible. All in all, no matter what, it's an ugly situation and IU would be justified in not hiring Beard because of it. But I don't buy the one-size-fits-all, 100% oppressor v. 100% victim approach to every domestic dispute or man v. woman physical altercation. I admit that might be true here, but I don't know enough to be able to judge and I don't think anyone else does, either.
 
I don’t understand the opposition against him. He’s the Coach Indiana needs.
He is but I would not even attempt to get a discussion going on this because those that are 100% against him no matter what and going to chime in and its going to be a toxic discussion imo. The bottom line is Dolson will hire who he wants not want some guys on a message board want.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Lucy01
I think all the details matter and I think it is highly likely the officer's affidavit is slanted and contains inaccuracies (not that you have to believe it all in order to believe Beard did enough that you want to stay away from his as the university's flagship hire). It's internally inconsistent and she later recanted.

I'm also pointing out how people think they know the whole story and do not. It's common for people to fill in details using some narrative they already know or one they want to be true. All people do it--trial lawyers exploit and have to defend against this tendency all the time.

Theoretically, here, sure it could be a different thing. For example, I wrestle with my son all the time. Headlocks are common. Putting my hands around his neck like Knight did to Reid has never occurred. Was Beard trying to restrain her from attacking him when he did that? I don't know. Her story after the arrest and his story suggest that is possible. All in all, no matter what, it's an ugly situation and IU would be justified in not hiring Beard because of it. But I don't buy the one-size-fits-all, 100% oppressor v. 100% victim approach to every domestic dispute or man v. woman physical altercation. I admit that might be true here, but I don't know enough to be able to judge and I don't think anyone else does, either.

 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT