ADVERTISEMENT

Biden Calls Trump Supporters

I actually think she could win the state. And she must agree because she held a huge rally in Raliegh today...

Don't underestimate the negative effect of having a scumbag like Robinson heading the ticket and being the top Republcan in NC. Trump has desperately tried to distance himself from his buddy Robinson, despite enthusiastically endorsing Robinson and characterizing him as MLK on steroids.

Not saying she's going to win NC, but at least it's an actual battleground state. Not like Trump indulging his fantasy of trying to win New Mexico, Minnesota,VA or NH which may be tight in some polls, but the trends in early voting show a drastic difference from the polls. Trump is reportedly going to visit New Mexico and Minnesota.I' m all for it, a fool searching for foll's gold...
NC is as tight as it is becuase of Danc's guy Robinson. What a whack job.
 
College Accuse GIF
Need a tissue?
 
As an independent observer I will telll you that the Trumpers are every bit as soft and easy to offend as the Libs.

Every bit.
You’re assuming the offense taken (in either case) is authentic.

Pretty much all outrage you see in a political context is feigned - the belief being that it will influence people who aren’t full-bore members of either tribe.
 
Also during that time support for Republicans has drastically decreased compared to the 80s. There are obviously other factors for it, as well, but Democrats controlling the MSM is the main driver in my opinion. It's why Elon buying X was such a big deal. I talked to a liberal guy yesterday who was complaining about the comedian's joke and had no clue of Biden's comment. I think eventually it will pierce his bubble, because of X. Prior to X there is zero percent chance of him finding out. Lastly, I think the affects of X will grow in significance each election. A good majority of people in their 70s, 60s, & 50s still trust MSM, get most of their information from it, and form their world view around it. Not the case with the younger generation on average.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC and dbmhoosier
Also during that time support for Republicans has drastically decreased compared to the 80s. There are obviously other factors for it, as well, but Democrats controlling the MSM is the main driver in my opinion. It's why Elon buying X was such a big deal. I talked to a liberal guy yesterday who was complaining about the comedian's joke and had no clue of Biden's comment. I think eventually it will pierce his bubble, because of X. Prior to X there is zero percent chance of him finding out. Lastly, I think the affects of X will grow in significance each election. A good majority of people in their 70s, 60s, & 50s still trust MSM, get most of their information from it, and form their world view around it. Not the case with the younger generation on average.
Anyone who gets their news from MSM knows about Biden's comment. Everyone covered it.
 
You’re assuming the offense taken (in either case) is authentic.

Pretty much all outrage you see in a political context is feigned - the belief being that it will influence people who aren’t full-bore members of either tribe.
Sorry but I have seen what soft sheep both BLM rioters and Jan 6 rioters are.
 
Not to split hairs, but is it possible to vote for a person without being a "supporter" of that person?
Absolutely, I have never and will never vote for Trump, but I mostly despise harris and her stance on almost everything. I blame the Pubs for putting all of us in this untenable position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
Absolutely, I have never and will never vote for Trump, but I mostly despise harris and her stance on almost everything. I blame the Pubs for putting all of us in this untenable position.
So the Republicans have a normal primary where millions vote and they nominate a candidate you don't like. Dems hold no primary well actually they rig it so people like RFK have no shot. Then they stage a coup against the sitting President and anoint a candidate you don't like. But somehow the choices you dislike for the election are all the Republicans fault. Makes sense.
 
NC is as tight as it is becuase of Danc's guy Robinson. What a whack job.
Yes, there's nothing the Democrats hate more than a pro-life Republican black man. So, they'll smear him as much as possible and throw every kind of accusation at him.

But you're the 'independent observer'. lmao
 
If all of that is true, Kristof should not have a job in journalism. That's appalling.
I haven't looked into it very closely. My money's on Community Notes. It does a pretty good job separating the wheat from the chaff.

That said, this sort of thing is common throughout all major media. They're far less interested in informing us than they are in influencing us. And I don't think it's at all uncommon for them to tell half of a story in order to do that.

This is why I'm so thankful for social media -- and so incredibly put off when the John Kerrys of the world muse about "how you curb those entities". Assuming I'm right about Community Notes, then we know the truth about this story *because* of social media, not in spite of it.

Is Kerry and the like talking about "curbing" the New York Times and Nick Kristof?
 
OK. But you're talking about tiny numbers of people there.

We gotta be aware when we're being handed a magnifying glass -- and other things that are designed to shape our views.
Don't use the word "our" here. Your views are shaped by laundry and the entertainment media that promotes that laundry. i hate all of them.
 
Don't use the word "our" here. Your views are shaped by laundry and the entertainment media that promotes that laundry. i hate all of them.
I'm not really sure what you mean by "laundry" -- but OK.

And I'm critical of more or less the entire major media as well. I think they've become vehicles for propaganda. In fact, that's the point I'm making. I'm not necessarily saying people should hate them. But they should sure as hell distrust them.
 
I haven't looked into it very closely. My money's on Community Notes. It does a pretty good job separating the wheat from the chaff.

That said, this sort of thing is common throughout all major media. They're far less interested in informing us than they are in influencing us. And I don't think it's at all uncommon for them to tell half of a story in order to do that.

This is why I'm so thankful for social media -- and so incredibly put off when the John Kerrys of the world muse about "how you curb those entities". Assuming I'm right about Community Notes, then we know the truth about this story *because* of social media, not in spite of it.

Is Kerry and the like talking about "curbing" the New York Times and Nick Kristof?
No, because Kerry recognizes and supports the First Amendment.
 
I’m not a doctor, so I can’t make that call.
Others make the determination based on their own needs at the time. It changes frequently.
Do you believe he's mentally fit to be President right now?

I don't think you can call out others for their inconsistency on this issue without addressing that, because it highlights a huge problem. If you're going to chalk up Biden's statement to senility or decreased mental faculty, it just raises the further question: why is he still the President and why did Harris cover up for him? *

*obligatory-I-don't-like-Trump-either disclaimer
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: stollcpa and DANC
No, because Kerry recognizes and supports the First Amendment.
And he regrets it being there in the context of social media -- because, if it weren't, it would be easier for them to curb those entities as he wishes to do....as governments elsewhere in the world are doing.

So, I agree he recognizes it. I will not agree with you that he supports it -- not in this context, anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stollcpa and DANC
Do you believe he's mentally fit to be President right now?

I don't think you can call out others for their inconsistency on this issue without addressing that, because it highlights a huge problem. If you're going to chalk up Biden's statement to senility or decreased mental faculty, it just raises the further question: why is he still the President and why did Harris cover up for him? *

*obligatory-I-don't-like-Trump-either disclaimer
Once again, my ignorance of his condition remains steadfast. I have never argued either way. Others have. Still others change their arguments based on the circumstances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baller23Boogie
And he regrets it being there in the context of social media -- because, if it weren't, it would be easier for them to curb those entities as he wishes to do....as governments elsewhere in the world are doing.

So, I agree he recognizes it. I will not agree with you that he supports it -- not in this context, anyway.
I was answering your question.
 
Once again, my ignorance of his condition remains steadfast. I have never argued either way. Others have. Still others change their arguments based on the circumstances.
Nice dodge. He’s been unfit for some time. The Dem’s finally decided he was after his debate performance and organized a coup to replace him on the ticket.

As for this last statement regarding Trump Supporters, Kamala has to own it because she still says he’s sharp. His cabinet has to own it too since they haven’t tossed him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Nice dodge. He’s been unfit for some time. The Dem’s finally decided he was after his debate performance and organized a coup to replace him on the ticket.

As for this last statement regarding Trump Supporters, Kamala has to own it because she still says he’s sharp. His cabinet has to own it too since they haven’t tossed him.
What did I dodge? You don’t know shit about his fitness. You have opinions which are not the same thing.
Me, too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baller23Boogie
I suspect Bulk was trying to dunk on me until you headed him off at the pass.

Nice job.

You’ll make the dream team yet.
Brad has seen how the tide is turning to MAGA, so he's been going more conservative.

Just the kind of survivor the Dream Team is looking for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcmurtry66
So the Republicans have a normal primary where millions vote and they nominate a candidate you don't like. Dems hold no primary well actually they rig it so people like RFK have no shot. Then they stage a coup against the sitting President and anoint a candidate you don't like. But somehow the choices you dislike for the election are all the Republicans fault. Makes sense.

DBM, have a hypothetical question for you.

If someone like a Daddy Bush in his prime ran in a primary against DJT who would win and why ?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT