From the perspective of doctors it’s a true legal morass.But the carrier can say it is ok and the state say welcome to the state pen.
From the perspective of doctors it’s a true legal morass.But the carrier can say it is ok and the state say welcome to the state pen.
I am seriously not trying to treat you like an ass. Just asking questions.I didn’t want to answer because you’re treating me like an ass. No, they shouldn’t have to carry it full term.
After thinking this over. I would make that trade. It inevitably opens the door to more forms of “free” health care. But the country has a birth rate problem and an abortion problem. So if Democrats are willing to agree to a full abortion ban, I’m willing to agree to free pregnancy care.Why the aversion to, at the point a pregnant woman leans toward abortion, offering free pre natal, delivery, and post partem care? Includng free adoption services for parents who want to raise a child?
Since we're talking about saving lives here. Just scaring a woman with YOU'RE KILLING A BABY YOU ****ING MONSTER sure hasn't worked over the years.
Should make everyone happy.Should make liberals happy.
Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill
The court found that anti-abortion doctors who questioned the FDA’s easing of access to the pill didn’t have legal standing to sue.www.nbcnews.com
Reading it might inform your positions here.Wish I understood the reference.
They got off on a technically: none of the plaintiffs were harmed and therefore didn’t have standing to file suit.This must be fake news. I have been REPEATEDLY, nay CONSTANTLY, reminded that the “GOP majority” on the Court are mere lapdogs for GOP policies and ALWAYS vote politics and ignore statutes and the Constitution to do so.
NO WAY they voted to preserve access to abortions. No way. Not even to save the life of a Republican mother on the first day of pregnancy.
Why would anyone agree to a full abortion ban, no exceptions?After thinking this over. I would make that trade. It inevitably opens the door to more forms of “free” health care. But the country has a birth rate problem and an abortion problem. So if Democrats are willing to agree to a full abortion ban, I’m willing to agree to free pregnancy care.
Correct.They got off on a technically: none of the plaintiffs were harmed and therefore didn’t have standing to file suit.
Need to be careful about how you phrase that. It’s a GOP majority in the sense that the majority of the Justices were appointed by Republican presidents. But Barrett and Roberts are Democrats. Kavanaugh and Gorsuch likely independent.Correct.
The evil GOP majority applied THE LAW.
He literally just did. It's the post you responded to.So post your disagreement with his post.
What does it matter how small the number is if abortion is murder? If it's murder, there should be zero exceptions, even for incestuous rape.That amounts to probably fewer than 1/1000 abortions.
I've never understood why women get pregnant when they aren't wanting to. I've taken a multi vitamin everyday for about 10 years now. I don't think there has been 1 day when I forgot to take it. We even have plan B pills now too as a backup.
He did only after I asked him to instead of laughing emoji.He literally just did. It's the post you responded to.
So your rhetorical question was just to be a dick?He did only after I asked him to instead of laughing emoji.
No. Maybe you should read again. I first asked him why. He answered.So your rhetorical question was just to be a dick?
You are crazy if you think roberts and Barrett are liberal and obviously not paying attention to all of the conservative bent to recent court decisions.Need to be careful about how you phrase that. It’s a GOP majority in the sense that the majority of the Justices were appointed by Republican presidents. But Barrett and Roberts are Democrats. Kavanaugh and Gorsuch likely independent.
Politically speaking, it’s a Democrat leaning court.
Before you and @UncleMark go into gang bang mode you might read the thread.So your rhetorical question was just to be a dick?
Which decisions? Explain how their conservative politics influenced them.You are crazy if you think roberts and Barrett are liberal and obviously not paying attention to all of the conservative bent to recent court decisions.
Just because a justice hasn't sold out to bribes or supported j6 doesn't make them liberal
I understand your reasoning but the issue i have is you don't care when danc, ulrey, yourself and other conservatives dish out laughing emojis on the regular.No. Maybe you should read again. I first asked him why. He answered.
Then later I asked him why he gave a laughing emoji to a posters heart felt religious beliefs. He then gave me an answer to why he gave the laughing emoji.
It seems to me you use it a lot. Your two replies to me today were good. I appreciate the answers. There was no snark and I understood your position.I understand your reasoning but the issue i have is you don't care when danc, ulrey, yourself and other conservatives dish out laughing emojis on the regular.
My use of it is generally meant as I disagree but don't want to waste time in an argument that would go no where
You won’t even acknowledge your error. Mark barked at me so you did without even realizing Hickory and me had a conversation that was fine. He just now cleared up even more why he uses the laughing emoji so much.Whatever you say.