I disagree. Archie isn’t a new HC. He’s been one for 8 years now. If you remove his one run to the Elite 8 he’s won a grand total of one NCAA Tournament game....one.That's hyperbole.
If you want to take the position that Archie is an unknown as a coach, that seems fairly reasonable.
Crean is no unknown. His deficiencies with coaching, roster construction, etc. have been beat to death on this forum. And, IIRC, even by you.
If you want to suggest that Crean was a (fill in the blank) coach and when it's all said and done, Miller MAY be worse, I'm OK with that. Suggesting though that the whole story has been written and the outcome is that they aren't "even in the same category" is pure hyperbole, and probably just a hope for clicks on the forum.
Your smarter than that. And IMHO this is just another example of one of your posts that is designed to generate a reaction, and has nothing to do with what you actually think.
By the time Crean was Archie’s age he had been to the Final Four and was a very successful coach in the Big East.
Archie is a classic example of a mid major coach who made one lucky run and got a job way over his head. It happens every year. He’s our version of John Groce.