Don't forget Clinton was the second President in US history to be impeached, for lying under oath. Led to my first, and probably only, vote for a Republican candidate.
My fallout with Nixon came before Watergate. In '68 I (mistakenly) identified the Dems with Daley's thugs beating up kids and the press in Chicago, and I came from a GOP family/neighborhood/township. Of course I was only 13 so I couldn't vote, but if I had a vote I'd have gone with Nixon. And his pledge to bring peace to Vietnam...
Wow that's just crazy to me. Clinton was great. He was super horny. He had to lie about that shit. That horrible hillary sittin home waiting for him. what was he going to do. i'd take big bill lying over that shit every day of the week over some virtue signaling goof like stay at home pete. my conservatives will throw a fit but bill was a great president. we'd be lottery lucky to have a guy like that out there today. hell when bill left office his approval rating was something like 65%
Yeah, but what I saw from the inside (a fed at the time) was an administration that started to believe the ends justified the means. Bill was Bill, a political phenom. My boss at the time told me his in-person charm was off the charts. He was virtually impossible to dislike if you met him in-person.
Guess morals do not matter to some people. And yes Clinton lied and got away with it because of the political machine covering for him. Just like they did Hillary and the several scandals she did.
When you build the nation, you’ve got skin in the game. When the nation is given to you on a silver platter, you take it for granted and your only skin in the game is as a spectator rooting for your team.
Yeah I don't look to the president for morality. Low unemployment, minimal inflation, prosperity, balanced budget mean more to me
Did you vote for Biden in the Democrat primary from which he was tossed for plagiarism?
I never voted for any Democrat in any national race, from 1980 until 2016.
Is that when you were diagnosed with multiple personality disorder?
No, CMS (Medicare). Saw a sweetheart deal for New York hospitals right before Hillary ran for Senate.
Morals certainly don’t matter for Trump supporters. That’s been clear for years.
Did you meet Joe biden and he refuse to sniff your hair? Jealousy is the little green god
when you have a personal injury case and your client is an old timer on medicare cms has a lien on the personal injury settlement for whatever they paid in medical bills. you have to negotiate the medical bills lien with cms. i'd rather be on naked and afraid frozen than go through that process
well what's miserable is that your scenario isn't the norm. more normal is you get in a wreck and the bad actor has $25,000 in coverage. medicare paid $50k toward your medical bills and you missed two months of work and have $5,000 in physical therapy/chiropractic that refused medicare and sent a lien on your case too. and your back still hurts and you want to keep going to your chiropractor who although worthless you believe in. and you call every day about your settlement. because this just ain't right. and while you're not a lawyer you know what's right is right. and it's been six months and medicare/cms still hasn't provided a payoff amount. and you have a friend who got 2 million dollars for their settlement.
Your enemies are immoral and watch only Fox News.
Luckily I never got near that mess. Hospital DRG payments was my forte. Plenty of our own messes, but we only dealt with hospitals and doctors. Never had to collect money from benes.
Lawyers please explain -- don't clients have a responsibility to safeguard their attorney-client documents?
NoLawyers please explain -- don't clients have a responsibility to safeguard their attorney-client documents?
According to Fox, "the FBI seized boxes containing records covered by attorney-client privilege and potentially executive privilege during its raid of former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago home, sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News," and:
"Sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News Saturday that the former president’s team was informed that boxes labeled A-14, A-26, A-43, A-13, A-33, and a set of documents—all seen on the final page of the FBI’s property receipt —contained information covered by attorney-client privilege."
FBI seizes privileged Trump records during raid; DOJ opposes request for independent review: sources
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized records covered by attorney-client privilege during its raid of Mar-a-Lago, sources told Fox News, saying the DOJ denied Trump requests for a special master to review those records.www.foxnews.com
OK, taking FoxNews literally, the FBI took entire boxes labeled on the outside only with an alphanumeric name like "A-14."
Didn't Trump have an obligation to put a label on the outside of the box that said specifically "attorney-client privilege," or something similar?
The lawyer has a higher duty to preserve the privilege. The client must take “reasonable” steps to preserve it. If there is “inadvertent” or “accidental” disclosure of a privileged communication, a judge ultimately decides whether it should operate to “waive” the privilege and allow use of the communication by the opponent.Lawyers please explain -- don't clients have a responsibility to safeguard their attorney-client documents?
According to Fox, "the FBI seized boxes containing records covered by attorney-client privilege and potentially executive privilege during its raid of former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago home, sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News," and:
"Sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News Saturday that the former president’s team was informed that boxes labeled A-14, A-26, A-43, A-13, A-33, and a set of documents—all seen on the final page of the FBI’s property receipt —contained information covered by attorney-client privilege."
FBI seizes privileged Trump records during raid; DOJ opposes request for independent review: sources
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized records covered by attorney-client privilege during its raid of Mar-a-Lago, sources told Fox News, saying the DOJ denied Trump requests for a special master to review those records.
OK, taking FoxNews literally, the FBI took entire boxes labeled on the outside only with an alphanumeric name like "A-14."
Didn't Trump have an obligation to put a label on the outside of the box that said specifically "attorney-client privilege," or something similar?
Hang on.
He's talking about the attorney-client documents, not the classified stuff. There are media reports the FBI confiscated both.
What happened was that Trump apparently mixed his boxes of unlabeled, supposedly private lawyer files in with his boxes of classified documents without labeling the boxes to reflect this. Aren't there different security standards for each group of documents? Paralegals and private attorneys are not automatically cleared to sort through boxes of classified material to find attorney documents. But the FBI was authorized to grab everything.
