ADVERTISEMENT

When you're no longer useful...

The critics are precisely right in that 1st amendment protection has NOTHING to do with employer-employee relationships and employment contracts. Arguing that it does is the height of stupidity and it's disappointing that any IU grad would do so.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jet812
The critics are precisely right in that 1st amendment protection has NOTHING to do with employer-employee relationships and employment contracts. Arguing that it does is the height of stupidity and it's disappointing that any IU grad would do so.
That’s wrong.

Colorado was, I believe, the first the recognize a public policy exception to employment at will. Now 43 states recognize it. Not all of those 43 have held that free speech is within the exception but some have and smart lawyers are constantly pushing that envelope.

Colorado also has h statutory exception for legal off the job conduct when the conduct has no connection to the employment relationship.

All of that can be modified by contract, but only for the big shots, not for the rank and file.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jet812
The critics are precisely right in that 1st amendment protection has NOTHING to do with employer-employee relationships and employment contracts. Arguing that it does is the height of stupidity and it's disappointing that any IU grad would do so.

DpQ9YJl.png


"While correct that the First Amendment is about government action and not a private workplace, Steele’s lawsuit refers to Connecticut law, specifically “General Statutes § 31-51q by Disciplining Employee for Constitutionally Protected Speech.”

As per her lawsuit, which you can read in full here, “Connecticut law holds employers liable for
‘disciplining or discharging’ any employee as a result of that employee’s exercise of his or her right
of free speech as protected under the federal and state constitutions.”

In layman’s terms, Connecticut law prohibits private employers from disciplining their employees for engaging in constitutionally protected speech, whether that speech takes place in the workplace or outside of it.

And therein lies her case."
 
The critics are precisely right in that 1st amendment protection has NOTHING to do with employer-employee relationships and employment contracts. Arguing that it does is the height of stupidity and it's disappointing that any IU grad would do so.
Tell me you didn't read the article without telling me you didn't read the article.

Fail.

ETA: Matt did the work for you. Smart IU grads should know what they are talking about before opening their mouth and showing everyone they don't.
 
First Amendment was never about freedom to say anything without repercussions. It was nothing more than you wouldn't be thrown in jail for your speech (unless it is something like yelling fire in a crowded place when there isn't a fire)

Apparently some states have gone further with protections of free speech. Although kind of ironic for the party that is generally against employee unions to be for employee free speech without risk of firing.

If someone is creating bad publicity through their public comments or actions that could blow back on the company, then seems like a valid reason for termination in my opinion.
 
So...LGBTQ people weren't being unfairly fired because of their "public comments or actions", but simply because their employers had personal, non-public knowledge that were gay?

lol, someone coming out of the closet has no effect on the company (unless the company is Bigots R Us)

Nice try at your apples and oranges comparison. one is a discrimination issue, the other is a freedom of speech issue (and extending it past it's original purpose).
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
Sage Steele didn’t have the requisite beliefs that a black woman is supposed to have.

She needed to be silenced.

The black conservative remains the most discriminated against group in America.
 
DpQ9YJl.png


"While correct that the First Amendment is about government action and not a private workplace, Steele’s lawsuit refers to Connecticut law, specifically “General Statutes § 31-51q by Disciplining Employee for Constitutionally Protected Speech.”

As per her lawsuit, which you can read in full here, “Connecticut law holds employers liable for
‘disciplining or discharging’ any employee as a result of that employee’s exercise of his or her right
of free speech as protected under the federal and state constitutions.”

In layman’s terms, Connecticut law prohibits private employers from disciplining their employees for engaging in constitutionally protected speech, whether that speech takes place in the workplace or outside of it.

And therein lies her case."
Give OS a break - he's just spouting the leftist line. Unless it's them being silcenced.
 
First Amendment was never about freedom to say anything without repercussions. It was nothing more than you wouldn't be thrown in jail for your speech (unless it is something like yelling fire in a crowded place when there isn't a fire)

Apparently some states have gone further with protections of free speech. Although kind of ironic for the party that is generally against employee unions to be for employee free speech without risk of firing.

If someone is creating bad publicity through their public comments or actions that could blow back on the company, then seems like a valid reason for termination in my opinion.
Always good to have a Constitutional scholar weigh in..... :rolleyes:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Indianaftw
Sage Steele didn’t have the requisite beliefs that a black woman is supposed to have.

She needed to be silenced.

The black conservative remains the most discriminated against group in America.
Who silenced her?
 
Disney quite literally suspended her and took her off assignments. What is wrong with you?
Uh that’s not silencing her. Was she jailed? She spoke. She had consequences . Freedom of speech isn’t absolute by any means. She quit. She can say whatever stupid thing she wants now. . Are you ok?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
Uh that’s not silencing her. Was she jailed? She spoke. She had consequences . Freedom of speech isn’t absolute by any means. She quit. She can say whatever stupid thing she wants now. . Are you ok?
She had consequences? Good God you are hook line and sunk with these assholes with an agenda. Good for Sage and she is right

While talking about ESPN’s company vaccine mandate, Steele said she respects an individual’s decision to get the Covid-19 vaccine “but to mandate it is sick, and it’s scary to me.”

It was not only scary it was AUTHORITARIAN. Good for her for taking a stand!

Again you lose sight of whats really going on!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Admittedly. I was raised by a single mom and an 6 year older sister. Also had a 9 year older brother.

These ladies formed my world view as much as anyone else.

It’s hard to believe that Zeke is the same species as these competent, confident woman.

She derives value from grievance. They derive value from accomplishment.
 
Disney quite literally suspended her and took her off assignments. What is wrong with you?
They have quite literally suspended a number of their on air personalities.

This is from 2014, and some of the names appear twice:

 
She had consequences? Good God you are hook line and sunk with these assholes with an agenda. Good for Sage and she is right

While talking about ESPN’s company vaccine mandate, Steele said she respects an individual’s decision to get the Covid-19 vaccine “but to mandate it is sick, and it’s scary to me.”

It was not only scary it was AUTHORITARIAN. Good for her for taking a stand!

Again you lose sight of whats really going on!
She didn't like that policy but she did get vaccinated.
 
Sage Steele didn’t have the requisite beliefs that a black woman is supposed to have.

She needed to be silenced.

The black conservative remains the most discriminated against group in America.
..right after the ADL.
 
Look here we've got another coward hiding behind a keyboard. You're a real tough guy. LOL!
Oh god.

Another fraud military man, that fancies themself a tough guy.

You recite the same rote, NeoCon talking points as Aloha. You realize that right?

You have no independent thought.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT