Would have been much easier for me personally to sell to one of the three large firms I could have sold too.
Knock it off with the calling out of other posters. Final warning.
Glenn Greenwald
I'm more upset about the inability to copy and paste a link instead of whatever that was.
The part of the 14th amendment being discussed was to keep insurrectionists/traitors from assuming the presidency or any position of power.
Even far left wing trump TDS hater says the obvious. Sorry bowlmania you are going to lose this one!
Democracy is dead!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There is zero chance of that.
We will see. Professor Schweikart has been batting 1.000 on these issues so far but Baris has been close. Good chance they simply run out the clock and don't even issue a decision until next year.
No one is arguing that. You libs always bring up this ridiculous nonsense. But immune from prosecution for things he believes are in the scope of his duties... absolutely.
www.archives.gov
Trump will lose that one and it will probably be 9-0. It's an absurd argument that a President is forever immune from prosecution.
Right. IF he urged a riot it isn't in the scope of any duty I know of. In fact, tell me what official duty the president has in an election. Here is the constitution, name his constitutional duty in determining who won an election.
The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription
[get-content name="print-page-left" include-tag="false" /] Note: The following text is a transcription of the Constitution as it was inscribed by Jacob Shallus on parchment (the document on display in the Rotunda at the National Archives Museum.) The spelling and punctuation reflect the original.
Prepare for a huge disappointment. He's going to lose the immunity case - SCOTUS may even just let the AC unanimous decision stand, which is the same thing. Again. So much losing.
Insurrection isn't part of his duties. Neither is defamation or stealing classified documents.
