on Merrick Garland for the Supreme Count?
And guys like @UncleMark were really pissed about it?
Good times
And guys like @UncleMark were really pissed about it?
Good times
Hey, remember when McConnell wouldn't allow a vote
- Thread starter DANC
- Start date
You are dumber than dirt. You are a total embarrassment to the GOP.
Yeah! Because you have leftist assholes that claim article 1 is unconstitutional. Schumer is a joke. I think the whole Demorat party is a joke.
If you are not embarrassed by now you should be. Basic comprehension skills seem to have left you.
Bring the fire Dan...
"You could have heard a pin drop, when DANC stopped and locked the door".
And most of the world with a functioning brain know that Trump and Trumpers are a joke.
Zeke continuing to bring premium content
care to explain the comparison?
1) Dems vote against impeachment on a partisan witch-hunt that was solely based on revenge for Trump being impeached on much more serious charges. Btw, Republicans in the Senate voted against removing Trump as well.
vs
2) McConnell refusing to fill an open spot on the Supreme Court seat for almost a year when Obama was president due to it being an Election year. An excuse never before used for refusing to fill a seat. 4 years later, he rushed through filling a seat during the 2020 election.
Now explain how 1 and 2 are the same.
I am waiting for the conservatives to respond to your post calling it a drive by
To be fair, DANC sticks around.I am waiting for the conservatives to respond to your post calling it a drive by
You missed the point. It's not that they 'voted'. They didn't vote on impeachment, which is their duty, under the Constitution.
But the larger point is that @UncleMark had a fit when McConnell went against normal Senate procedure and held up the hearing for Garland. But he doesn't utter a peep when Schumer goes against normal Senate procedure and blocks an impeachment hearing - the first time in history for an official who hasn't resigned their position prior to a Senate hearing.
What's nonsensical is your total misunderstanding of those points.
Hick just wanted to used the term 'drive by'. He doesn't really understand what it means.
They're not the same and I never said they were.
They both do go against normal Senate procedure, which is my point. I guess I should have spelled it out better for people like you and Goat, who have more myopic views.
I'm not sure higher frequency of posts is a good thing in this instance. I guess can call it doing donuts
Probably more apropos.I'm not sure higher frequency of posts is a good thing in this instance. I guess can call it doing donuts
UTFO just throws a grenade and watches the aftermath.
That's a very weak argument, and also not one you made in your OP. Trying to back pedal this just makes you look stupid.
Um you haven’t been around here long if you think that is the liberal playbook. May I introduce you to OP to start with?
Like I said...Insults. Ive already had the pleasure.
Delta Tau Chi does not have explosives. By order of the United Nations. Otherwise, we’d have to nuke them . . . .
Burning sacks of dog shit, OTOH . . . .
I think he would be shocked by the results if we actually counted insults lobbed by conservative posters vs liberal posters.
The Democrats voted that Mayorkas was carrying out administration policy, therefore impeachment is a violation of separation of powers.
The Democrat argument is total bullshit and Danc has this one exactly right.
The impeachment charge is not about policy, it’s about Mayorkas refusal to enforce the law. Disagreeing with the policy of the law is not grounds to ignore the law. By saying following the law is “policy” the democrats have just told all of us that the administration has discretion about whether to follow the law. That’s crazy.
Why in the hell should congress pass any law if the executive branch has discretion whether to follow it?
I expected the trial to be about the idea that the administration is unable to follow the law because of Trump or something.
But no, the Democrats stuck yet another knife in the side of good government by saying following the law is it’s sole and unreviewable choice.
Last edited:
Danc has nothing right. He compared a case where McConnell didn't allow a vote to a case where Schumer did.
That you guys don't like the outcome is immaterial. His point was idiotic.
Oh, that’s what makes him look stupid… I thought it was something else.
Didn’t they actually vote on a motion that Schumer made, but NEVER voted on what the house sent over. Two totaly separate things, right?
DTX was our intrmural basketball team name back in the day. Ahhh the memories.
It's still infinitely more things than the Senate voted on re: Garland. OP's point was a bad one. You can't explain it into something other than it was.
Did you all sober up by half-time or did you just gut it out?
Or, if you were all toked up like Kevin Durant before a game you might have had some out-of-your-mind outside shooting from beyond the arc. The rim can look five feet in diameter.
More than once I went from Happy Hour to a game. I was, of course, much younger then.
Odd way to say he and now me, are correct, but I’ll take the win. See you at chipotle councilor.
When you start sweating out that PBR nobody wants to guard you.
That and ripping ass in the lane.
Latest posts
-
-
The Roster is full and loaded! Shooter Alex Hemenway and big man Nikita Konstantanovskyi- Latest: Big Red Crimson Buffalo
-
