Who is for shooting " all for shooting BLMsheep rioters/looters inside a Target"
I'm for arresting them. Isn't that what police are supposed to do?
Biden's speech...
- Thread starter Bloom.
- Start date
I'm for arresting them. Isn't that what police are supposed to do?
What, exactly, are BLM's plans to improve the treatment of blacks by people of authority?
The only plan I've heard is to defund the Police.
As far as the Arbery case, justice is being served. You have no idea if the 3 white men though it "OK legally to do what they did". You are making up more shit in your mind to try to justify your idiotic idea that life sentences aren't justice.
I'm anxiously waiting to hear from you what their plans are after the Police are defunded. . Please be specific
Your post is a perfect example of why anti-Trump Republicans can’t support Democrats - you are eaten up with exaggeration, shading, half-truth, and outright lies. Just like the claims you make against the Trump you sell.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
I don’t think they’re different in any way. I would hypothesize Trump’s tweets reached just as money or more people as a weekday morning (non-Prime Time) speech from Biden.
Trump wasn’t worthy of the office with his behavior. Biden isn’t worthy of reelection based on performance to date and that (and Harris’) speech.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
He was not cleared. Mueller said he couldn’t find a way to charge the president. That’s not clearing him. Unless you and I have different meanings of the word “clear” in non legal terms.
Tweeting was definitely Trump's greatest strength and weakness.
It got him instant attention and following, but he carried it too far. Thoughts that should have stayed in his head came out in Twitter.
I don't think that makes him unworthy of the office, but everyone has their own opinion on it.
Kicking him off Twitter has probably helped any potential future political career more than hurt it.
Well, geez, if you're falsely accused of a crime but it can't be proved, that's called being found innocent in a court of law.
I think you've fallen victim to the media spin on it.
I appreciate the effort, Mas, but insults only work if they make sense. I'm thinking your sentence might have been lifted from one of those extremist websites you frequent. The people who curate those sites aren't particularly bright or particularly literate, so make dictionary.com your friend in 2022. Start by looking up "necrotic," and don't pair it with "envy."
Wishing you a new year of peace, clearer thinking and a shift toward sanity.
I recall arguments/discussions about DOJ policy regarding charging a sitting president.
Nope, it's called being found not guilty.
Some non-innocent are found not guilty.
I'm sure the lawyers here know of some such cases.
I am not coming down on Trump or his associates as I have no idea what happened in regards to Russia
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
Seriously all wrong. He wasn’t charged. That doesn’t mean he was cleared. Mueller couldn’t find a way to charge the president. Read between the lines. And don’t accuse those of us who try to understand issues from all sides of “falling for the media’s spin.” GTFOH.
per mueller:
"Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decided we would not make a determination as to whether the President committed a crime. That was our decision then and it remains our decision today."
I've come to the realization that none of danc's posts can be taken seriously, but many are unintentionally entertaining.
Absolute mendacity at work.
Here are the facts;
BLM/Pantifa over 500 incidents in 7 months.
20 murders by rioters.
Hundreds of small businesses, many minority owned destroyed by arsonists and looters.
150 federal buildings damaged.
Over 2,000 law enforcement injured.
1-2. $Billion damages.
Rioters were bailed out immediately.
Most charges dropped.
The media promoted this violent insurrection.
Mendacity? By whom?
Where in the Cortez88 post you cited, did he deny or even refer to any of the items you just mentioned?
Get a ****ing grip.
OK. I accuse you of humping sheep.
I guess if you can't prove you didn't, you're not innocent of beastiality.
Tomatoe Tomahtoe
Seriously all wrong. He wasn’t charged. That doesn’t mean he was cleared. Mueller couldn’t find a way to charge the president. Read between the lines. And don’t accuse those of us who try to understand issues from all sides of “falling for the media’s spin.” GTFOH.
per mueller:
"Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decided we would not make a determination as to whether the President committed a crime. That was our decision then and it remains our decision today."
Lol. It's a message board, danc. Don't post if you don't want replies and reactions.
You and your lady were being old and slow. I didn’t want to drop you right in front of the TSA agents, which I would have.Well, it was right there with the TSA agents standing around us. One of the TSA agents gave me a nod when I told the punk to F off and move on, but he'd probably have had to step in if I decked the guy. He only had me by a couple inches and a few pounds, but he was clearly a wuss, and I'd have felt bad for decking him. Plus I'd expect that TSA might have delayed me enough after that I would have missed my flight. They might even have kicked me out of the airport. My wife would have been pissed at me for either of those outcomes, but she was happy that I told the punk to F off.
If I had a nickel for every time some boomer told me to F*ck off, I’d be a millionaire. You think that bothers me? You probably don’t even vape.
I can't take you seriously when you reduce Jan 6 to this.
Not an insult, bowel
You posting history exposes your likely fatal TDS, and envy. You are literally dying of envy.
Funny. You create another straw man, that
'Extremist' from whom I supposedly lifted my sentence. This straw man is neither smart nor literate....invented by you.
Won't work.
You're busted!
Lol.
No, you hopeless moron. You, not IUINSB, would have the burden of proof and, if you didn't meet it, then he would be found not guilty (but not necessarily "innocent" as that term is commonly understood). Do you think OJ was innocent?
Then again, I'm talking to someone who believes the Supreme Court makes law. And that China could blow the US Navy out of the water. And that Kamala Harris was vice president on 1/6/21. And that the Gateway Pundit is a credible news source. And, etc., etc., etc.
That's what I said, dumbass. If I accused him of beastiality and couldn't prove it, he wouldn't be innocent, by his thinking, would he?
You really are desperate today.
Watching your posts is like watching someone lose their mind.
I don't blame you, danc, for trying to deflect from your moronic posts, but here's a reminder (below) of the absurdity of one (posted today in your "Wise Latina" thread). I guess you slept through 8th grade Civics, assuming of course that you made it as far as the 8th grade.
"Pretty disturbing, actually. If they're making law based on bad info, we really are screwed.
Hopefully someone corrects her and whoever else is making inaccurate remarks."
Similar threads
