ADVERTISEMENT

“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure..."

:D

:D

Hmmm. Interesting. No sword fights. No devil’s threesome. It COULD work. Give your brother husband breaks to do things he wants. Go out. Sleep. Watch tv. Whatever.
 
Hmmm. Interesting. No sword fights. No devil’s threesome. It COULD work. Give your brother husband breaks to do things he wants. Go out. Sleep. Watch tv. Whatever.

I see the wheels turning...

She's already married. There's no commitment if you just want to leave.

You gets yours when she comes calling and then she goes home to her husband.

This is perfect for you!

To bad you found someone.
 
:D


read an interesting piece on, or possibly by, Hugh Hefner once.

pre Playboy HH was engaged to the love of his life, who then slept with someone else.

HH was destroyed, as in a punch to the gut that never goes away, ever, destroyed.

HH realized he'd been set up his whole life by society for this life altering punch to the gut he'd never be free of.

he reasoned that while maybe girls were raised with a warning that their mate could betray them, (men do that, it's their nature), young men growing up weren't warned of this happening.

point being, does the norm of fidelity by society set us up to be utterly devastated, if/when that fidelity breaks down?

have we all been set up by a societal myth for romantic heartbreak.

do the pluses outweigh the negatives in society raising us in this version of reality, or would we be better off if raised that humans, male and female, desire more than one sexual partner, just as we desire interacting in everything else in life with more than just one individual, that that was normal and not being so was the abnormal, and that said interactions with others have nothing to do with whether, or how much, a significant other loves us..
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT