Your thoughts on the final CFP rankings?
- Thread starter Radio Zero
- Start date
Ok I didn’t really check out the rest of games.
I thought the disagreement was between Michigan and Alabama.
The order is debatable, but these are clearly the four most deserving teams.
Is UGA really that much more deserving than OSU? Both lost to one of the final four but OSU had an early season loss to a good Oregon team, which is the major difference. UGA's non-conference opponents were GA Tech, Charleston Southern and UAB - beat by a combined score of 157-14. One could argue the Committee is saying don't play a tough non-con schedule.
It’s ridiculous that GA and Bama aren’t playing a rematch in the semis.
The order they came up with is the most logical. I don't want to see an all SEC final but I expect to. They look like the best two teams. Maybe Michigan can beat Georgia.....more than a puncher's chance.....but Bama will walk away with the championship again. It's sickening, like it was with the Patriots and Brady in the NFL, but that's what's going to happen.
I think UM should have been bumped up to #1, given how they man handled their last two ranked opponents. Bama beat Georgia more easily than I thought, but if Auburn didn’t completely choke away the Iron Bowl, bama wouldn’t even be in the discussion. I too think it came down to how the committee wanted to set up the championship game, not really who deserved what ranking.
It they're the “best two teams”, then why aren't they ranked #1 & 2? You’re ruining your own reply that the rankings are logical. They are deeply flawed. UM should be #1. BAMA & GA 2/3. Cincinnati 4. That would've been the most logical conclusion. Instead we have a made for TV SEC championship game looming,
I can see an argument.
Baylor lost an early game to OK State, which was avenged in the Big12 Champ game, and lost a close game at TCU.
Georgia is built to destroy teams like Michigan Look for a 20 point margin
