Think he has a short list of coaches that have said they are interested?
Is the contact strictly though agents since the season is still on going?
Any chance he has his coach and just waiting until the end of the season to announce it?
If your list is accurate then Dolson needs to be firedIf I were to guess...
Over the last week, I think Dolson has been in contact with a variety of current/former coaches, asking their input on who he should contact. Thus far, I think Dolson's short list includes:
Brad Stevens
Scott Drew
Dusty May
Grant McCasland
Out of respect to the other programs, Dolson will only be in contact with agents, with no one "in waiting."
hope not. Cast a wide net and talk to all reasonable candidates. Who hires for a position and talks to 1 or 2 candidates? I mean besides IU basketball?I’d guess he’s pretty far down the road. Probably doesn’t have his guy yet, but has a very good idea who it is.
That would depend on how he got to that list. And why those are the names currently on the list.If your list is accurate then Dolson needs to be fired
Get Beard's nuts oucha moufIf your list is accurate then Dolson needs to be fired
Even so, it would be more about the process than the particular names on the list. This isn’t directed at you, but just because all we internet ADs have to go on is shared speculation doesn’t mean IU’s efforts so far match up with that speculation. The only thing we internet ADs know is that we don’t know anything.That would depend on how he got to that list. And why those are the names currently on the list.
If all 4 of those fellas are on the list because they're in dialogues, and are actively considering the IU job. Dolson might deserve a statue outside Cook Hall. But if he hasn't talked to any of them, has no idea if they'd be interested, didn't vet out all the various other viable candidates out there, and weeded them out for whatever reasons...then yes, sure, he'd be negligent in his duties, and need to be fired.
As with most things...the realities likely fall in between. And if those are his current list, and that means one of those guys will be our next coach...I'd be excited as hell to know that right now.
Hmmm, at least he doesn't sound like he has nuts in his mouth!Get Beard's nuts oucha mouf
Rabjohns said yesterday that we're using the same search firm that we used with the Cig hiring.
Nope, that's exactly what I'm afraid of. The best scenario is Dolson actually talks to anyone who is a solid candidate and then picks the guy who blows him away. What you described is how we got Sampson, Archie and Woodson. What I describe is likely how we got Cig and Knight, (because they'd have never been the candidate you settled on early), which do you think is more likely to give us a great hire?The best scenario would be Dolson already knows and is sitting back while watching us squirm. The search firm may be smoke and mirrors. I think Dusty May has too strong of IU ties not to be the one, it just won’t be signed until Michigan is out. If there really is a search firm, it’s just in case Dusty reneges before signing.
Does lighting strike twice in the same place?Rabjohns said yesterday that we're using the same search firm that we used with the Cig hiring.
Someone who knows who they want and are confident they can get them.hope not. Cast a wide net and talk to all reasonable candidates. Who hires for a position and talks to 1 or 2 candidates? I mean besides IU basketball?
Yep, and that's exactly how you end up not getting the best candidate; because you didn't take the time to talk to them and focused too early on 1 person. Reminds me of a cartoon I saw once where a General leading an army of soldiers carrying spears and shields, says "Salesman? I'm too busy to see a salesman!". And the next pane is a salesman with a machine gun waiting outside his door.Someone who knows who they want and are confident they can get them.
Yep, and that's exactly how you end up not getting the best candidate; because you didn't take the time to talk to them and focused too early on 1 person. Reminds me of a cartoon I saw once where a General leading an army of soldiers carrying spears and shields, says "Salesman? I'm too busy to see a salesman!". And the next pane is a salesman with a machine gun waiting outside his door.
Yep, Archie was pretty much universally endorsed by everyone (including RMK if I remember correctly!). It would become more apparent if you had someone to compare them to who just blew you away. Again, no one would've hired a 30 something newbie from Army if they set their sights on the flavor of the month.Its likely this is what happened with Archie. It's hard to believe Glass had a two hour interview with Archie and got blown away by how dynamic he was. More likely that he had questions after talking with his but what reassured by what everyone else was saying and writing.
I think Dusty has been close enough to our program for others to have a good idea how he comes across. I can’t imagine Woodson’s schtick sounding impressive in an interview, nor the moribund Archie Miller of wooden Indian heritage. That said, there are only so many hungary Dan Hurley’s out there. I want someone glib of tongue with an edge in attitude, smart as a whip and not afraid to crack it…a Bob Knight character who checked all the boxes. Woodson checked none.Nope, that's exactly what I'm afraid of. The best scenario is Dolson actually talks to anyone who is a solid candidate and then picks the guy who blows him away. What you described is how we got Sampson, Archie and Woodson. What I describe is likely how we got Cig and Knight, (because they'd have never been the candidate you settled on early), which do you think is more likely to give us a great hire?
And many people at the time said his offense was boring.Yep, Archie was pretty much universally endorsed by everyone (including RMK if I remember correctly!). It would become more apparent if you had someone to compare them to who just blew you away. Again, no one would've hired a 30 something newbie from Army if they set their sights on the flavor of the month.
A boring offense is okay if you win with it. The motion offense of Knight’s was boring, especially early in his career when there was no shot clock. Later, IU fans tired of the motion offense when his winning percentage dipped slightly and wanted to get away from it in favor of a more modern, up-tempo run and gun NBA style offense. How has that one worked out for entertainment value? “Not well” you thought to yourselves.And many people at the time said his offense was boring.
McCollum's offense is far from boring. They just have a lot of possessions that end near the end of the shot clock. Lots of probe dribbling, side a side movement, cutting, etc...And many people at the time said his offense was boring.
I don't care if the guy speaks frontier gibberish as long as he wins.I think Dusty has been close enough to our program for others to have a good idea how he comes across. I can’t imagine Woodson’s schtick sounding impressive in an interview, nor the moribund Archie Miller of wooden Indian heritage. That said, there are only so many hungary Dan Hurley’s out there. I want someone glib of tongue with an edge in attitude, smart as a whip and not afraid to crack it…a Bob Knight character who checked all the boxes. Woodson checked none.
He did.I didn't think Dolson used a search firm for football?
Or is that just a way to see what coaches are interested?
Could be as simple as that’s the type and tempo of offense that works best for the personnel he has.McCollum's offense is far from boring. They just have a lot of possessions that end near the end of the shot clock. Lots of probe dribbling, side a side movement, cutting, etc...
I never really thought the Virginia/Wisky approach was overly boring...I just don't believe in limiting possessions at a place like IU, where you could have access to all the best and most skilled players.