I do see the difference.Any objective person could recognize the extremely significant differences between HRC’s case and Trump’s, yet you can’t or won’t admit to knowing them.
Hillarys case was much worse.
I thought you didn't want to do this?
I do see the difference.Any objective person could recognize the extremely significant differences between HRC’s case and Trump’s, yet you can’t or won’t admit to knowing them.
What did Hegseth do?This is a waste of time. Neither one of them bears any resemblance to what Hegseth did.
Leaking security info, either accidently or purposely, is not new territory.This is new territory.
Woke. There you go boys. Your red meat.It was dumb and careless. They're still 10x times better than Biden and the woke left.
lol...you went fishing and threw it out first. I felt bad you weren't getting any bites 🤷🏻♂️Woke. There you go boys. Your red meat.
I’m hearing rumors that Hegseth was a DEI hire. You guys hearing the same?This is a waste of time. Neither one of them bears any resemblance to what Hegseth did.
Well at least your admitting that Trump and administration are inept.We agree!
What’s to add?Shocked the biggest Trump supporters are missing from this thread.
Leaking security info, either accidently or purposely, is not new territory.
What’s to add?
Apparently nobody knew the reporter was included. It was supposed to be some guy named J. Greer. I don’t know anything about this app. I’ve seen it reported that its use by government people was routine. (DOGE people have noted often how obsolete and f-up government tech is). In any event after the bombs fell, the mistake became moot. I loved Vance’s comment about Europe.
“Also, as someone who has read his fair share of Top Secret/SCI war plans, this ain't it.”
What do you think the Pentagon Papers were?Leaking it in the run up to a military operation is new territory. You know that. And we’re 60 days in. The sky’s the limit with these dumb f*cks.
Agreed. At least Hegseth should be familiar with OpSec.“Also, as someone who has read his fair share of Top Secret/SCI war plans, this ain't it.”
That’s what Hegseth said. Maybe cya. I don’t know why operational details would be given to this chat- group anyway.
Uh, no. DoD uses Microsoft Teams, and it isn’t authorized for classified discussion or documents either. This is a real screw up.What’s to add?
Apparently nobody knew the reporter was included. It was supposed to be some guy named J. Greer. I don’t know anything about this app. I’ve seen it reported that its use by government people was routine. (DOGE people have noted often how obsolete and f-up government tech is). In any event after the bombs fell, the mistake became moot. I loved Vance’s comment about Europe.
If you hear hoofbeats, don't look for the zebra.
And the rolling of some heads would be appropriate.If you hear hoofbeats, don't look for the zebra.
Way too many explainers that don't make sense. This was a bad screw up that could easily be addressed by someone saying "my bad, this will never happen again".
Hasn’t the administration already confirmed the message was authentic?Honestly, some cannot admit a single clear mistake. Everything is "defend at all costs, scorched earth". Hegseth screwed up, easy to say. Anything else is obviously a partisan lie
Good grief…it’s not the reporters fault.I enjoyed Trump's "deer in the headlights" response to questions about this, and how he quickly insulted the magazine. Later, Hegseth went full on scorched earth on the The Atlantic and the reporter who was included in the chat.
Even if you fully agree with that opinion, it's still nothing but a red meat distraction for the MAGAs. He even threw in a "Russia, Russia, Russia" .
I enjoyed Trump's "deer in the headlights" response to questions about this, and how he quickly insulted the magazine. Later, Hegseth went full on scorched earth on the The Atlantic and the reporter who was included in the chat.
Even if you fully agree with that opinion, it's still nothing but a red meat distraction for the MAGAs. He even threw in a "Russia, Russia, Russia" .
I do see the difference.
Hillarys case was much worse.
I thought you didn't want to do this?
What’s to add?
Apparently nobody knew the reporter was included. It was supposed to be some guy named J. Greer. I don’t know anything about this app. I’ve seen it reported that its use by government people was routine. (DOGE people have noted often how obsolete and f-up government tech is). In any event after the bombs fell, the mistake became moot. I loved Vance’s comment about Europe.
Different standards for different parties. are you shocked?DOGE did not say our government's classified communications systems were the least bit obsolete. They aren't
"after the bombs fell, the mistake became moot". I'm sorry, but if you are going to take a crap on crooked hillary for her stupid emails, then you surely ought to be appalled by this. Both instances of behavior are appalling. Further, the fact that an end occurred doesn't render a clear screw up like this nunc pro tunc. I don't even think you actually believe that.
Don’t play their misdirection game. This is about this incident. Make them address this incident.Scenario 1: A person caught speeding pulls over and stops for the police officer and admits to speeding
Scenario 2: A person caught speeding floors it in an attempt to escape. Finally gets caught and tries to lie that he was speeding in the first place.
Person in scenario 1 has a chance to get a warning. Person in scenario 2 lost that chance and now has a good chance of testing out handcuffs. No one in their right mine would say that their punishment would/should be the same just because the initial issue was the same (speeding). And definitely wouldn't be claiming that scenario 1 is "much worse".
But I'm not sure why this is even being discussed in this thread other than you have no defense for the actual subject of this thread so the new strategy is just to derail or yabbut it.
If you and I -- and Jeff Goldberg -- can get on Signal, it's a public platform. I realize that it's encrypted, etc. etc. But that doesn't mean it's not a public platform.
And the fact that Goldberg was somehow copied on these demonstrates the folly of using such a platform. Who among us hasn't accidentally CC'd somebody on an email that wasn't intended for their eyes? I have. I've also been copied on messages that weren't intended for mine. It's usually just mildly embarrassing. But in at least one instance I can recall, it was genuinely costly.
An assistant PM who works here once accidentally sent our entire bid list to one of our suppliers. It included outstanding bids, including our bids and key quote amounts from...suppliers.
I don't know if the choice of Signal as an interagency messaging platform was made by the Trump admin or prior. But, whoever made that decision, something like this was bound to happen at some point. I'm sure Goldberg's inclusion was an honest mistake. But that really wasn't the mistake that ought to get our attention.
Scenario 1: A person caught speeding pulls over and stops for the police officer and admits to speeding
Scenario 2: A person caught speeding floors it in an attempt to escape. Finally gets caught and tries to lie that he was speeding in the first place.
Person in scenario 1 has a chance to get a warning. Person in scenario 2 lost that chance and now has a good chance of testing out handcuffs. No one in their right mine would say that their punishment would/should be the same just because the initial issue was the same (speeding). And definitely wouldn't be claiming that scenario 1 is "much worse".
But I'm not sure why this is even being discussed in this thread other than you have no defense for the actual subject of this thread so the new strategy is just to derail or yabbut it.
that's why i added the part at the endDon’t play their misdirection game. This is about this incident. Make them address this incident.
I didn't hear about Hilary's being over time once she was caught She turned over her server when she was being investigated and cooperated through being cleared. She didn't fight the investigation, try to get followers to think the FBI did an improper raid on her house nor have a 2nd server that she tried to hide and claim didn't exist. Having a hard time thinking her scandal was closer to Trump's but sure somewhere between Biden and TrumpThat analogy works for Biden. They found six pages at his home and they reported it. Hundreds of documents were at Trump's home, and he kept trying to hide them. The two cases aren't close to the same. A shoplifer with a $100 item and submits to arrest when caught vs a bank robber who fights the police trying to arrest him.
Clinton is closer to Trump. They found 60ish top secret documents. That was over time. She could/should have shut down the server after one, certainly after two. She was willing to let it keep happening. That is very problematic.
I get why they go more leniently on people who discover a document and call it in. That is the behavior they want, they don't want them burying the document in the backyard to stay out of prison. It is why Biden's case is so very different than Trump's. The bigwigs who have been caught and punished were actively covering up. That's the behavior they REALLY want to stop.
Create a group that does not report to the president. They monitor documents. After a meeting, no one, not even the president, leaves the room if 10 documents were handed out and 9 were returned. No documents in the private areas of the White House or US Naval Observatory. Documents cannot leave secure areas of House/Senate. The elected have to leave their offices and go to the documents. I know that will cut down on the time they have to call to gladhand for money, but that's just an extra benefit. The problem doesn't seem to be the people who can get fired for losing documents, it is the people who largely won't get fired.