ADVERTISEMENT

We are close

Wiedersehen

Junior
Jan 6, 2019
1,316
1,966
113
I know it’s results that matter most, but this team is close. We’ve lost close ones to very good teams in Maryland and Purdue. We beat a good (per the NET) team in OSU.

If we’d have closed out the last two, we’d comfortably be in the field.

Badgers aren’t great and they do lose games in their building. Win that one and then take care of business at home against Michigan and UCLA. This team can be a 6-7 seed in the NCAA. And then who knows. The talent is there to make a run b
 
I know it’s results that matter most, but this team is close. We’ve lost close ones to very good teams in Maryland and Purdue. We beat a good (per the NET) team in OSU.

If we’d have closed out the last two, we’d comfortably be in the field.

Badgers aren’t great and they do lose games in their building. Win that one and then take care of business at home against Michigan and UCLA. This team can be a 6-7 seed in the NCAA. And then who knows. The talent is there to make a run b
I appreciate your optimism. You are a glass half full guy. Wrong, but nice view point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GeorgeStrait IU
I know it’s results that matter most, but this team is close. We’ve lost close ones to very good teams in Maryland and Purdue. We beat a good (per the NET) team in OSU.

If we’d have closed out the last two, we’d comfortably be in the field.

Badgers aren’t great and they do lose games in their building. Win that one and then take care of business at home against Michigan and UCLA. This team can be a 6-7 seed in the NCAA. And then who knows. The talent is there to make a run b
close but no cigar for woody.
 
I know it’s results that matter most, but this team is close. We’ve lost close ones to very good teams in Maryland and Purdue. We beat a good (per the NET) team in OSU.

If we’d have closed out the last two, we’d comfortably be in the field.

Badgers aren’t great and they do lose games in their building. Win that one and then take care of business at home against Michigan and UCLA. This team can be a 6-7 seed in the NCAA. And then who knows. The talent is there to make a run b

that would mean we'd become a top 25/30 team in the country which we're clearly not. not even close. what is our big win?
 
I know it’s results that matter most, but this team is close. We’ve lost close ones to very good teams in Maryland and Purdue. We beat a good (per the NET) team in OSU.

If we’d have closed out the last two, we’d comfortably be in the field.

Badgers aren’t great and they do lose games in their building. Win that one and then take care of business at home against Michigan and UCLA. This team can be a 6-7 seed in the NCAA. And then who knows. The talent is there to make a run b
If my Aunt had balls...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tammany Hall
that would mean we'd become a top 25/30 team in the country which we're clearly not. not even close. what is our big win?
Per Woody,TN scrimmage and South Carolina. Woodson absolutely doesn’t understand NET. He doesn’t recognize those Quad 4 wins that make his win/loss record look okay, are WORTHLESS when it comes to getting in the Big Dance.
 
I know it’s results that matter most, but this team is close. We’ve lost close ones to very good teams in Maryland and Purdue. We beat a good (per the NET) team in OSU.

If we’d have closed out the last two, we’d comfortably be in the field.

Badgers aren’t great and they do lose games in their building. Win that one and then take care of business at home against Michigan and UCLA. This team can be a 6-7 seed in the NCAA. And then who knows. The talent is there to make a run b
We are #65 in the NET. And the schedule is getting harder. We are not close. At best we somehow make the tourney, but that’s looking less and less likely.
 
Is this so unrealistic?

L @UW
W MI
L @MSU
W UCLA
W PU
W PSU
W @ WA
L @ OR
W OSU

That would be a 11-9 B10 record. It doesn't require us to play any better than the last two games.
 
Find a new hobby. Close? Close to 20 turnovers. Close to this team completely imploding. Is it the late night gambling, bar runs, bickering in huddles, walking off the floor after games, pushing opponents, benching of your freshman mcdonalds all american, inability to execute down the stretch, 59/66th offensive and defensive kenpom rating, or losing streak that gives you hope? A 4th season of Woodson, with this payroll, is not acceptable to just be close. The only thing that is close is the removal of Woodson. I will enjoy my idiot sister in law who is a Purdue fan running her mouth today more, than reading about someone who thinks we are close.
 
Is this so unrealistic?

L @UW
W MI
L @MSU
W UCLA
W PU
W PSU
W @ WA
L @ OR
W OSU

That would be a 11-9 B10 record. It doesn't require us to play any better than the last two games.
That should be the floor..Have we been playing to our potential. Should be very doable.
 
Of the 5 guys on the floor at the end of the game, 4 had double digit scoring nights and 1 had zero. The guy with zero points rec'd the inbound and didn't look for anyone else. That tells you everything you need to know about the leadership of the team and how not close they really are.

If you need more:
"Indiana head coach Mike Woodson hinted at wanting a timeout but admitted the moment passed too quickly.
'Once [Rice] took off, I couldn’t get to [the official],' Woodson said. 'It was too late. The official had already gone by."'

I mean, really? You couldn't call a timeout in time? The official had already gone by? Isn't the offensive basket on the same side of the court for the team in the second half? Is anyone really buying this bullsh!t?

There is a reason this team panics and collapses late in games. They are not really that close.
 
Close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

20 turnovers and allowed 81 points. 12 turnovers and 70 points would be close.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT