You really think we have more lumber than we can ever use? That comment alone is disqualifying.
Trump Tariffs
- Thread starter dbmhoosier
- Start date
Be was told so by our president, who is never wrong about absolutely anything, so of course its gotta be true.
How long is our wood supply supposed to last? With a dwindling supply, prices for new construction are only going to go up, no?
It won’t be announced until Musk owns Stihl and Caterpillar.
How about some planned harvest in California also? Just spitballing here of course.
Can we agree on a few things here?
1)There were much less disruptive ways to accomplish any goal this administration has/had.
2) Trump owns this economy now. He inherited challenges, but so did his predecessor. Given #1, and the fact that the large rise in M1 happened on his watch with his FRC.
M1
View a measure of the most-liquid assets in the U.S. money supply: cash, checking accounts, traveler's checks, demand deposits, and other checkable deposits.
fred.stlouisfed.org
3) The under on Willie hosting the next meaningful Farm Aid just got juiced to +400.
Canada as the 51st would ensure no R ever won the oval again. It would be a big, beautiful, blue state. Some say the most beautiful blue state.
Shhhhhhhh.
The people around here think that everybody around the globe loves us and our fearless leader. They don't want to hear the drawbacks to these things.
I disagree. Raising taxes to increase revenues would have been much worse for Americans and there aren't many cuts politically feasible right now. Also, if the economy slows down from the tariffs he'll get his rate cuts, which will be further savings. I think there is 7 trillion in debt that needs to be rolled over this year.
Eventually, it becomes his economy either way. If his objective was to reshore, cut government/regulations, and lower rates it needed to happen quickly. There is going to be pain, but growth could be humming around in 12-24 months if they get lucky. This is assuming he's serious about the tariffs.2) Trump owns this economy now. He inherited challenges, but so did his predecessor. Given #1, and the fact that the large rise in M1 happened on his watch with his FRC.
M1
View a measure of the most-liquid assets in the U.S. money supply: cash, checking accounts, traveler's checks, demand deposits, and other checkable deposits.fred.stlouisfed.org
3) The under on Willie hosting the next meaningful Farm Aid just got juiced to +400.
Last edited:
Russia and China (proxy) are fighting a war currently against NATO (Europe). There isn't a chance they're going to tell their trading partners to settle in Euros and strengthen their enemies currency and position.
Edit: Also, Crazy, China has reduced their holdings of U.S. debt for years now. They knew we were going to have to print our money and don't want to be holding it as it continues to devalue. The euro and Europe is much worse of than the dollar and us.
Last edited:
A fact no one is considering that if Canada reacts to the tariffs by encouraging its citizens to stop traveling to the U.S. our highways will become incredibly more safe. The world’s worst drivers are those with Ontario license plates on their vehicles.
It is known.
Eh. The most dangerous place in the world for pedestrians and motorists is Athens, Georgia. Unless UGA has an away football game.
Why not? Maybe not Russia, but why not China? The leader of the West with the reserve currency has slapped the EU with tariffs, is threatening to seize territory from one of them, and is indicating reducing the amount of military cooperation between them all. What does China lose by switching the #2 economy on the planet's reserve currency to the Euro? It is already a currency of one of their competitors. What do you think Trump's reaction would be if China, Brazil, India, and South Africa all switched to the Euro? And then if those countries convinced Saudi Arabia and other OPEC countries to do the same?
Listen, I was and am all about tilting the teeter totter a little bit back this way but what happens if all these countries we are bullying decide it isn't worth it anymore and they are better served to go deal with a different bully? And oh yeah, this bully doesn't care one iota how they act in their own backyards, they just want commerce.
The problem with the last two weeks is that the people in charge aren't thinking too far down the road. I felt in the past that I was a pretty conservative guy. I have never voted for a Democrat to Federal office. Never. If things continue on this path I will be voting to oust Victoria Spartz. There are no Senators up in 2026 but I would be voting against them if I had the chance too. Not because I am a Democrat, dear lord they suck, but there is no other alternative to put the brakes on the absolute bull shit that has occurred the past two weeks.
The Republicans have turned into unthinking assholes lead by two internet trolls who are eating up the lap dog sycophants cheering them on through social media. I am out.
Never trust anyone who is THAT polite about everything, no matter how bad it is!
"EH, you cut off my arm, it's ok really. I have two so no harm no foul".
We’re 45 minutes from Athens when we’re down here. We’ve been there several times. All you have to do is dive under the jacked-up pickup barreling towards you. There’s plenty of ground clearance.
Preston is a moron.
If you're going to be the reserve currency... You have to run trade deficits. That's how it fkn works
I left "goals" in #1 generic for a reason. There have been multiple goals discussed.
I understand the theories behind your post above. I'm not sure onshoring is feasible. What's the justification for broad onshoring, if we have an already type labor market? Especially, how does that square with bringing in H1B's to take jobs at a 50% cut in pay?
It's interesting that Murt's number one economic gripe was inflation, and now you're advocating for it.
I do understand that economic changes are not a zero-sum game, but there are always tradeoffs. The definition of a tax is one thing, but the ultimate cost of some policies lead to results similar to a tax.
I don’t see any way someone could look at our situation and think, what we need are corporate tax cuts and tax cuts for the wealthy. (And that has nothing to do with revenues, or debt.) Added to M1 and other factors, we're adding fuel to the fire. It’s not going to end well. The timing and relationship to how M1 is handled will be key.
Trump would have still beaten Hillary and Harris. But yes, it would be a lot more difficult.
Some people, like Trump, are willing to put their love of the country over political interests.
